Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think that lots of money was spent on skylines (RBs) in jap and lots of money in USA on supras (JZs). But your 6.4@220mph is in a pro rwd car as you have said its light and runs on better tracks. How many Pro RWD RBs are there anyway that have run in the last 2 years.

There has been flow data posted on SAU before, proengines even has a sheet up on his website.

But unless you compare two heads done on the same machine with the same operator you're not going to get an even comparision.

I've heard Titan get 298cfm peak @ .5" on their race heads, not validated locally as there's only 2 in Sydney that I know of (Camrydore) - and I doubt they would hand over the data. I personally know of 3 RB26 heads that are at 310+ cfm @ .5" in Sydney, but again getting more data is rather fruitless as these are not cheap and people don't want to discuss things that come at such a high price. Especially when it's for a competition application.

How many high tech tube chassis'd RBs are going around? Not counting Duke in Japan, that's medieval compared to the carboned bodied, electronic controlled suspension technical marvels that are the Titan/Scranton Bros cars. But you would know that, right? Rob (ohmy8s) will be getting his car on the road soon but it's a fair cry short of the US efforts (no offense, it's a pretty damn good package but as a privateer he doesn't have the funds, crew or workshop facilities to be on level pegging with the Pro teams in the US)

How about Willobank, if you can beat a 10.1 @144mph on street tyres and a stock engine than we talking :]. Anything else doesn't inpress me. When you beat a 10.1 (with a stock motor), than he'll come and do some HAPPY LAPS for you ;).
Rattle the monkey's cage.......and steal his bananas :):woot::rofl:

:D cheers :D

PS, I am actually finding it very entertaining, but I have to go, I have a 2600 bhp engine to tune.

go bananaman go

go bananaman go

go bananaman go

:banana::banana::banana:

Edited by rb26s13

Sydneykid: 89-2004 for jz engines. Stopped making because of emissions.

Drag racing isn’t the only sport where the biggest wallet wins. I think that would be the same in every sport. Money + knowledge.

See my comment made to nismoid re chassis tech in drag racing.

Mate, the more I read the more I realise how much of a fool you are.

Go race at wakefield. What does it prove? That you have a better package for circuit racing. Does it prove that you are making more power than a jz? No. If both of your cars weigh similar and you can’t beat the 144mph trap speed then he makes more power. Pretty bloody simple.

26b: woo, ran an 8.XX in the bmw. That is a little way off 6.4.

Dennis: I agree mate. Absolutely ridiculous comparing engines by circuit times.

R31nismoid: No shit Sherlock. There are obviously other things involved with making a car run quick times but if you are going to tell me that there is a better way to compare outright power then let it be heard? I am sure the whole motorsport community would love to know.

We are not talking about power to weight. Assume same weight so you can get your head around that.

Are you kidding re this dude baiting? f**k me, some of you guys are wankers.

Post up the stock numbers and this thread can be closed.

C-dawg: might want to do a bit of research mate

So does anyone want to put up the numbers for rb25 and 26 heads?

All this thread has proved is that there are many childish people on this forum that have nothing to add but ridiculous biased comments.

R31nismoid: No shit Sherlock. There are obviously other things involved with making a car run quick times but if you are going to tell me that there is a better way to compare outright power then let it be heard? I am sure the whole motorsport community would love to know.

Well a certain device called an Engine Dyno comes to mind... Or even a Chassis Dyno Day... everyone on the same day

But hey, what would i know right? Im just one of those biased individuals (hope you dont mind me using your words)

I'd rather be one of those biased individuals that a totally mis-informed one :)

Only just found this thread its gold!!!

Full of rubbish that in no way relates to the original topic!!!

As for flow numbers here they are:

Rb26 (std) Inlet: 148cfm Ex: 105cfm

Rb25 (std) Inlet: 136cfm Ex: 98cfm

2JZ (std) Inlet: 139cfm Ex:121cfm

1JZ (std) Inlet: 134cfm Ex: 115cfm

Thats on our own machine with our own testing measures but they are all tested in the exact same way so the data directly corilates to each other.

Let the BS stop right here!!!

  • Thanks 1

Thanks a lot Fitzpatrick Speed works.

Those numbers are what most people on the toyota site expected except I would have thought the rb26 head would have outflowed the 2jz in both aspects.

Also, backs up the 1jz vs 2jz head. A lot of people thought the 1j head outflowed the 2jz head but now that is 2 tests that have proven otherwise.

Thanks mate.

Only just found this thread its gold!!!

Full of rubbish that in no way relates to the original topic!!!

As for flow numbers here they are:

Rb26 (std) Inlet: 148cfm Ex: 105cfm

Rb25 (std) Inlet: 136cfm Ex: 98cfm

2JZ (std) Inlet: 139cfm Ex:121cfm

1JZ (std) Inlet: 134cfm Ex: 115cfm

Thats on our own machine with our own testing measures but they are all tested in the exact same way so the data directly corilates to each other.

Let the BS stop right here!!!

Manifolds on or off?

Same lift?

Bare port or trimmed?

Exhaust flow in our out?

With the RB25 was it Neo or not?

:) cheers ;)

Edited by Sydneykid
Also, backs up the 1jz vs 2jz head. A lot of people thought the 1j head outflowed the 2jz head

Have I got this right, you came to a Skylines forum to find out how much a Toyota head flows?

:) cheers ;)

sorry gary heres your info

All heads checked with no manifolds either side, and trimmed ram tubes to suit each head. All checked with standard lift as per standard cams. Bare ports, with exhaust flowing out! Rb25 wasnt a neo and the variable valve timing wasnt activated for the test so that is a significant factor for the rb25 head right there. In no way was I trying to swing any arguements they are just the raw figures. In personal choice the rb26 head is the go as the inlet design is so far superior to the 2jz but the exhaust seriously lacks in standard form, as with anything these can all be modded but I am not giving away the figures we were able to pull out of the rb26 head. would shock a few people here with just how huge of a potential these can flow, but then you will get the ney sayers that will argue head porting a turbo is a waste of time or you lose down low torque etc etc.

A few more side notes for those interested.

The rb26 is one of the highest flowing heads we have tested in terms of cfm for the inlet, now most production cars run at around 70-80% effeciency on the exhaust side but the rb26 is down there, lot of this has to do with the big lump on the inside of the port, so it can be fixed.

I would expect up to 10cfm increase on the rb25 with vvt activated.

The 2jz head is a real strong perfromer however the inlet manifold is garbage so in real world terms i dont think it would be as strong as indicated here.

How is saying the 1jz head outperfroms the 2jz is an idiot the cam timing and lift is lower for starters!

The best factory head we have run at factory specs is definately the early evo mitsu heads with the inlet and exhaust flowing within 5% of each other, and flowing from memory around 130cfm.

Like gary has eluded to testing on a bench fro max number is like a dyno comp. it doesnt matter if you make 30 peak hp more if you dont start making power till 6g when the guy who came second starts making good power at 3.5g, his car is always going to feel and be quicker. When looking at these numbers bear the whole system in mind ie. inlet manifold design, and exhaust manifold design, room for improvements, and how they work in conjunction with a sum of other parts!

Cheers.

Daniel

this thread would have to be the stupidest f**king thread on any car forum i have ever seen.

it truely shows some peoples maturity level.

sydney kid, you never cease to amaze me with the shit that comes out of your brain and onto this forum.

MPH is a direct result of power, there are other measures but MPH is a bloody good measurable realisitc measure, circuit times and ets aren't.

there was a thread 6 months ago on rb 25's versus 1j's, there was plenty of shit in that thread maybe you girls can continue your arguements in there.

fact remains, its a known fact toyota engines JZ series will take far more power for far longer periods of time than RB engines. that is fact.

one of the main reason i built my car was to go race GTST's and flog there arse cause i always percieved that nissan owners thought they were above the rest and a bunch of arrogant c**ts. my little internally stock 194000k engine has put many big dollar full house nissan engines to shame on both the dyno, drag strip and engine longevity table.

but guess what, along the way i have met a whole heap of great guys such as BU5TER, 2RISMO, TWOOGLE, etc that have changed my views on skyline owners, but its people like you SK that make all other skyline haters hate skyline owners. many toyota guys get on this forum as there are far more drag racing guys here than on our equivilent toyota forum.

fitz, great info, appreciate you putting it up.

i apologise ahead of time if my comments have offended anyone.

Shane.

Sure have on my brothers datto with the supercharger

SR20 s14b vvt low port head: (std) Inlet: 125cfm Exhaust: 111cfm (vvt not activated)

Sr20 s13 non vvt High port: (std) Inlet: 129cfm Exhaust : 114cfm

With standard valves we got aarons up to 165cfm on the inlet, and 148 on the exhaust thats around a 35% increase, lots and lots of hours though, and absolutely huge cams!!

Fj's flow really well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...