Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking into getting a bigger turbo on my R34, i was looking at a GT2835 and they seem to be the way to go, im chasing around 350-400rwhp, nengun have them for around $2500, does anyone know where i could get one at a better price or any other options for turbo's?

Cheers

Brad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137749-turbo-upgrade-on-r34/
Share on other sites

I've got a GT30 in my stagea s2 (same engine/turbo as r34) and with a 3" exhaust it goes really well. Not sure of its upper power capabilities but I know its slightly higher rated than the GCG hiflows.

I'm in SA and went to Adelaide Turbo Services. Great work and great advice.

Its got very little lag and quite good pull throughout the rev range, but then I'd only have between 120-140 awkw at the moment so not really the sort of power you're looking for...but I know this turbo can deliver some good numbers.

Others have had great results with the gcg hiflow as well.

Definitely do the research and talk to a turbo expert. Its not necessarily what is the better turbo but what one might be better suited to your setup (or planned setup).

Hope this helps :ninja:

Thanks guys, there are 4 different versions of the 2835 on nengun,

HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.68 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 100mm Diameter

HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.87 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 100mm Diameter

HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.68 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 80mm Diameter

HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.87 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 80mm Diameter

Which would be the most suitable for me?

Cheers

Brad

Matter of taste but I'd get the .87AR turbine housing version for an RB25 and definitely the Neo version since the better VCT should help pull the bottom end up a bit . I'm not 100% certain but it looks like HKS intended the .68AR housing for RB20's and the .87AR one for RB25's .

Cheers A .

Hey, was looking at 3037's on horsepowerinabox.com, 2k for one seemed pretty appetising but i heard these dont bolt up but they say they can get an exhaust housing to fit straight up? can anyone shed some light on this?

Actually don't do that because the kit only comes with the 0.68 rear housing and the 0.87 is much better.

Hi fellas,

Not too sure about the 0.87 rear housing being much better than the 0.68 - I had a chat with Grepin a few months ago when he went from the smaller 0.68 to the 0.87. Power went from 312rwkw to 320 with a bit of loss midrange. Looks like the 2835pros maxes out @ 300ish kw - no matter what you do it runs out of puff.

If you want 300rwkw it'll do it but don't expect much more.

Not too sure about what difference the 80-100 actuator will make - if it helps I got the .67 kit with 100 mm actuator. Also of interest both Grepin and I have problems keeping the wastegate shut - mine peaks @ 22psi then blows the wastegate open and boost falls to 17psi. Grepin got a higher tension wastegate spring and that helped a bit.

Something else I found a bit annoying with the kit was the wategate actually hits the dump so can only open a fraction.

Apart from that it fits up great with minimal headaches - the only thing we had to make sort of was the afm to hks intake pipe - we just cut down the factory rubber intake and it looks fine - a nice and factory look.

Cheers

Edited by gtst25

I'd go the HKS 2835/3037S Pro S because its internally gated which means less mess.

Also the 100mm front housings are meant to be better on the 3037.

I think with gtst25's statement, its really the compressor thats holding back the turbo from making much more power. Time to step up to the 3037.

2835 pro s gets my vote :ninja:

i make a lazy 251rwkw (337rwhp) with 11 flat afr...

but get the KIT, its so much easier with the kit its directbolt, also you DONT need a gasket for the turbo to dump pipe. i spent a few weeks tring to get incontact with hks etc to get the gasket and in the end hks reply with "the HKS GT2835 PRO S DOES NOT need a gasket at all"

ohh im not sure how the 3037 does with lag, but i dont really notice it that much with the 2835 i get full boost between 3000 and 3500rpm

what ..!

the biggest down fall of the 2835pro s is the fact that its internally gated...it doesnt stay shut above 18psi...these turbo's are meant to be efficent to 1.5bar .

the most i could get was 1.3-1.4

im running 16psi without a problem and i was told turbo was most efficent @ 1.2bar or something like that

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...