Jump to content
SAU Community

Classic Skyline Register


rsx84

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

YEAR: 1995

MODEL: HR31 GTSX Series 3 front and rear taillights

BODY TYPE: Coupe 2DR

COLOUR: Dark blue over silver with rainbow metallic flecks

Drivtrain: RB20 DET Silvertop/Automatic

Not currently registered working on a manual conversion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Year:1989

Model: R31 gts2 (GTSR31)

Body: 4 door

Color: Red(ofcourse)

Just picked her up tonight, feels good to own a nissan finally :P .

Congrats on your purchase! Im kinda envious of you :(

Brings back alot of memories. I wasnt fortunate enough to have money during uni days to own one of these and this is going back 13 years ago.

Anyway I have recently been gathering funds to purchase one to keep as a collectible. Just wondering if you wouldnt mind posting up some pics? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Year:1988

Model: R31 Skyline Ti

Body: 4 door

Color: Classic White

Mod: KnN Pannal filter, S3 taillight conversion, S3 headlight conversion is to come soon maybe with my spair wing from my wrecked EL Fairmont that had a Tickford wing

new to these Forums but a reg on the R31 Forums

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YEAR: 1988

MODEL: R31 GX executive

BODY TYPE: 4 Door

COLOUR: classic white, dark grey pin strip along the sides

Drivtrain: RB30E with automatic gearbox

mod: lowered pedders suspension and radio removed (stolen? dunno) is how i bought it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Year: 1983

Model: DR30 RS (KDR30JFTIAK)

Body Type: Coupe

Colour: Silver over Bluish Black (stock colours)

Engine: FJ20ET

Mods: Totally Stock other than a GReddy Profec B boost controller and aftermarket pressure relief valve, and late model tail lights. Have a spare motor that will be worked in the future.

3841689660_a4114af98a_o.jpg

3841689024_3c6d90d60f_o.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Year: 1990

Model: Series 3 Executive

Body Type: Sedan

Colour: Maroon

Engine: RB30E

Mods: lowered, 2.25" exhaust with cannon from cat-back...bout it really.....for now :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Have to scratch an MR30, broken up for spares.

It was "Goldie", stock model, plated 1/85, had come from Victoria and used to run on LPG before I got it.

Has been replace with,

YEAR 1984

MODEL MR30 Ti

BODY 4 DOOR SEDAN

COLOUR LIGHT GREEN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...