Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I will go with cubes on the no bov very good on gear changers my car cherps 3rd and 4th now and with the horrible jerky driveability issue when changing gears at part throttle and low rev's and the odd stall none of that happend it stoped the stalling and the on the freeway before the bov was allways open a litle bit and also the sound (fluter) is much better. ps my boost is at 12psi

Edited by RB SANDY
  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Interesting you have the same pain in the arse part throttle gear change issue.

I can't work it out as a mates VLT has no bov and that drives fine.

But the instantly on boost feel when grabbing that next gear feels so so sooooo much better. :laugh:

That bleed hole may be 4mm dia at the gasket, but the orifice is only 0.5mm max inside.

The bleed or leak is very very slight and probably designed to smooth the transition of the BOV open/shut.

I was able to blow quite a bit through mine. Definitely felt more than 0.5mm as 0.5mm is literally bugger all, based on when I've played around making my own bleeders in the past.

Top stuff. I will look in to it. :laugh:

you'll need some sort of a reducer for the thing that the plumback pipe clamps onto. i did a dodgy and put a layer of the old pipe underneath the new one.

In theory it should handle any boost level I would have thought. The valve has the same pressure on both sides of it at all times when your on boost.

Only when shifting can it be a problem, and event then the down side is that the bov doesn't flow enough to allow it to stop a pressure spike back through the intake plumbing and reducing turbine speed.

Except that the fins are setup, so that if force is applied on one side, it'll spin and move air, if applied the other way, the air will flow through, but not turn the turbine...

Now think about it, air is being forced in, so it can easily blow back out, and put NO force on the turbo to slow it...

Some people are smart eh?

I blocked off the BOV on my 32 GTS-t just by making myself a new gasket similar to the mount one but without a hole in the middle, essentialy closing off the 'tee' into the inlet pipe.

Tried it just to see what it would do, definitely picks up quicker, but i don't have the same jerkiness issues as you, Cubes. Either that or I haven't noticed haha.

Until I find conclusive evidence that running no BOV causes turbo damage ( no I don't wish to start a war or we might as well call this forum ns.com) I will continue running it this way.

I ran my R30 with no BOV day in day out at around 17psi boost for ages, it did over 200,000km and the turbo lasted longer than the piston rings, so meh

my 2 cents anyway

Dwayne

Knew I took a pic of my BOV block off gasket (for want of a better term)

Apologies for inage size and quality...

Oh yeah don't bother clicking on it to see it larger, AAAAAAHHHH PIXELS!!!

Dodgy camera phones

Edited by PHOTON-XL

Photon-XL does not having a bov create compressor surge? With the bov blocked off does it make

the flutter noise? I am just interested as its something i would like to try. To do it do you just block

off the return pipe, make a new gasket to seal the hole on the intake & how do you block off the

vacuum line? Other than this idea does anyone reccomend a specific bov? because the standard

one sounds pretty annoying after a while. thanks

Interesting you have the same pain in the arse part throttle gear change issue.

I can't work it out as a mates VLT has no bov and that drives fine.

But the instantly on boost feel when grabbing that next gear feels so so sooooo much better. :blink:

I recently got my bov (silly hks loud one) removed from my HR31 and I have experience no issues except it being much nicer on gear changes as it does not have to build up boost again, it also doesn't backfire as often when changing gears.

Can someone answer me this, I dont really understand how a plumback works, Im assuming it plumbs the air from near the TB back into the compressor. What I dont understand is wouldn't the pressure be the same and the air would take the lowest pressure path, out the air filter? I know this clearly isn't what happens, but could someone explain why it is so.

Probably because the compressor is creating a vacuum like situation on the intake side (it's still spinning), hence the air doesn't necessarily go out the air filter. That's just my thinking anyway.

Theoretically not having a BOV should be bad if the airflow is going back through the compressor because it will slow it down, bad for getting back on boost (driveability) and bad for the turbo because of extra stress on the shafts/bearings or whatever. In practice though it seems that maybe the vacuum created in the plenum once you've closed the throttle may make the air suspend or at least force its way towards the plenum, which is what you guys have experienced. Mind you this is taking into consideration quick/high rev changes. The part-throttle/low rev changing may change the way some of the airflow behaves given compressor speed etc.

Theoretically not having a BOV should be bad if the airflow is going back through the compressor because it will slow it down, bad for getting back on boost (driveability) and bad for the turbo because of extra stress on the shafts/bearings or whatever. In practice though it seems that maybe the vacuum created in the plenum once you've closed the throttle may make the air suspend or at least force its way towards the plenum, which is what you guys have experienced. Mind you this is taking into consideration quick/high rev changes. The part-throttle/low rev changing may change the way some of the airflow behaves given compressor speed etc.

That sounds good in theory but I think the turbo having to spin up and fill the ic piping and fmic negates any benefits of the compressor being slowed slightly, so its one theory against the other and in practice the no bov and not having to fill the ic piping and fmic theory wins.

Give it a shot the no bov really will spin you out how much quicker it spools and is on boost again after a gear change.

Probably because the compressor is creating a vacuum like situation on the intake side (it's still spinning), hence the air doesn't necessarily go out the air filter. That's just my thinking anyway.

Hmm after thinking about it for a while I think this is what happens, however as the compressor loses speed the vacuum would lessen and then I guess the pressure would eventually equalise by going out the air filter.

I had BOV leakage issues in my old R32 when I decided to run up to 1.1bar...Blocking up the recirc hole didn't really do much IMO, I've read heaps articles/forum topics about this very BOV on this very topic, because I was so interested at the time...and still am now!

I discovered the function of the recirc hole (in very non-technical terms) is to allow the BOV to open as fast as possible, even at very low boost (and near-boost vacuum levels)...hence the loss of down-low driveability, slight surging & flutter exhibited when blocking it up....with not much benefit - the BOV is opening slowly now and as such allowing some air to reverse back through the turbo & AFM...causing incorrect readings which are then fed back to the ECU.

That being said, I took the idea further and made up a plate to go underneath the BOV that had a hole around 1cm diameter in the middle, essentially making the BOV even less able to flow air...This had an enormous effect, and is where I picked up the extra 1 psi of boost and the much increased response after gear changes...From this experiment I can only surmise that the BOV was leaking quite severely through its seating (the car must've done around 170-180,000k's, many of which at higher then standard boost)...Side effects were that the car was way more inclined to surge on throttle lifts, had the occasional near-stall when returning to idle and air reversion (flutter) on every single gear change when on boost, but power was up and it felt much more lively...Conclusion - a better BOV was what I really needed ...If I wanted to keep stock-like driveability as well as keep the increase in response.

(newer stock or GTR BOV retrofit was what I was thinking at the time)

Edited by RaseR
I will go with cubes on the no bov very good on gear changers my car cherps 3rd and 4th

Thats because you cant change gears correctly, or you have poor tyre/suspension setup.

"chirping" on gear change has absolutely nothing to do with/without having a BOV.

Give it a shot the no bov really will spin you out how much quicker it spools and is on boost again after a gear change.

i found the opposite while using the stock ECU, NO BOV caused no end of issues (RB25) with stalling and throttle response.

GTR BOV went on, problem went away :laugh:

But stalling etc is largely due to driving style as your already aware im sure :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1680, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...