Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's not an option imo. You do realise how close Sandown is to residents? I can literally hear revving and tyres screeching from my uncle's place down near Corrigan Road.

As much of a great idea it is to promote legal drags, I don't think the near-by residents would appreciate the disturbance late night.

Sandown was there long before those residents moved in.

Its like buying land next to an airport and then complaining about the noise.

  • Replies 307
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Instant membership ban on members who attend Noble Park/Princess. Great idea... NOT

How about just ask these people to remove stickers/club affiliation from their cars.

Why does everyone on SAU think they are angels....

I must admit you guys at SAU are great at deceiving everyone. When I joined this forum you all gave the impression that you were all mature angels that only ever do such activities on legal tracks. I guess 90% of the members do but I was pretty shocked to learn a couple of individuals are actually from a different crowd.

The image was going well but it has just fallen apart in the last few months through reading here and also other sources.

No offense was intended by this post, just stating my observation.

That's not an option imo. You do realise how close Sandown is to residents? I can literally hear revving and tyres screeching from my uncle's place down near Corrigan Road.

As much of a great idea it is to promote legal drags, I don't think the near-by residents would appreciate the disturbance late night.

What came first

The chicken or the egg?

I must admit you guys at SAU are great at deceiving everyone. When I joined this forum you all gave the impression that you were all mature angels that only ever do such activities on legal tracks. I guess 90% of the members do but I was pretty shocked to learn a couple of individuals are actually from a different crowd.

The image was going well but it has just fallen apart in the last few months through reading here and also other sources.

No offense was intended by this post, just stating my observation.

So what if they are from a different crowd?

What people do in thier own time, away from club events has absolutely nothing to do with SAU-Vic as a club. What people do outside of events is a matter for the Victoria Police and other bodies to administer.

If people are going to do whatever they do with club gear on themselves/cars at events etc etc.

They will be instantly ejected from the club.

If however people choose to do/attend illegal things, that is really thier own choice as they are going there on thier own will.

Nothing to so with the SAU-Vic club at all as its a public matter, not a private one.

To associate someones personal actions with the clubs, is wrong.

If people are going to do whatever they do with club gear on themselves/cars at events etc etc.

They will be instantly ejected from the club.

So will these 4 people be ejected from the club? Scott obviously knows who they are....

So what if they are from a different crowd?

What people do in thier own time, away from club events has absolutely nothing to do with SAU-Vic as a club. What people do outside of events is a matter for the Victoria Police and other bodies to administer.

If people are going to do whatever they do with club gear on themselves/cars at events etc etc.

They will be instantly ejected from the club.

If however people choose to do/attend illegal things, that is really thier own choice as they are going there on thier own will.

Nothing to so with the SAU-Vic club at all as its a public matter, not a private one.

To associate someones personal actions with the clubs, is wrong.

I understand that completely and wasn't attaching personal actions to the club at all. I was just talking about what it looks like from the outside, I am in no way trying to offend SAU-Vic.

You can't really ban members for the places they go or the crowd they are with because you dont agree with it.

Just becuase they were in the area doesnt mean they were directly involved with what happend.

Edited by mr_crust
So will these 4 people be ejected from the club? Scott obviously knows who they are....

Who cares if he knows?

The Committee does not care. I do not care.

You might, but thats not the clubs concern as per my post

You can't really ban members for the places they go or the crowd they are with because you dont agree with it.

Just becuase they were in the area doesnt mean they were directly involved with what happend.

I'm pretty sure its PAID members that they are talking about.

If you're not a paid member, keep dragging :unsure:...................NOT (BORAT VOICE)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...