Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i still can't really see any point to using forged pistons in a street car. but each to their own, the extra $600 or so for the build might help you sleep at night anyway, if so it's money well spent i reckon.

we'll see how long my casties last and what power i put down with them reliably anyway, might help some people see the light :)

p.s. had my first run with a fastish car on the weekend - "200rwkw" 180sx down the gold coast. anyway murdered him through 2nd and 3rd - even with the laggiest turbo known to man. i really need a tune too.

hey!

I got casties in my rb30 too. did you change the rod bolts at all? because mine are stock also.

How much power have you made ??

Mine was tuned to 16psi only because i am too scared of breaking the engine. if i was game id run it to 22psi and roll off another hundred hp at the rear wheels at least.. but yeah im scared of the cast comming to pieces or something lol

tell me the details of your engine ?? will be interesting for my next power up :O

You want a 0 deck clearance. At top dead center the piston is flush with the top of the block.

sounds good, you have been there done that so all the info is pretty helpfull

whats a formula to work out comp ratio and what ratio were your pistons ideally, had they been in an rb25

hey!

I got casties in my rb30 too. did you change the rod bolts at all? because mine are stock also.

How much power have you made ??

Mine was tuned to 16psi only because i am too scared of breaking the engine. if i was game id run it to 22psi and roll off another hundred hp at the rear wheels at least.. but yeah im scared of the cast comming to pieces or something lol

tell me the details of your engine ?? will be interesting for my next power up ;)

No i didn't bother changing the rod bolts. Have you ever heard of rod bolts breaking on an RB30? cause i hadn't :P

i have only a vague idea of what power my engine is making as it's still running an RB25 base map for the time being. as i mentioned, it REALLY needs a tune. but i'm not going to bother yet, not until my blower is on the engine and piped up.

basically i have a built RB30DET with custom manifolds and a GT40 turbo with 1.34!!! rear housing at the moment. it was all built to run as a twincharge with an Eaton supercharger, hence why the rear housing on the turbo is so large. it's still remarkably good to drive though, even with RB25DE cams and no tune the top-end power is astounding.

Just spent over an hour reading this thread.. tired as hell. sorry if i missed it but if the RB25/30 conversion is done, can a R33 gtst power FC tune it all up or do you have to go with another type of comp?

yeh mate i run gts-t pfc with my 30det

got mine back yesterday, has a very mean "serious business" exhaust note haha.

No boost as yet until it's run in, but even so definatly has more balls than the n/a i drive daily.

Just itching to get some boost into it though. :devil:

head restrictors

does anyone have a pick of the hole i have to weld up and the the one i have to put the restirctor in

also when do i get one of these restrictors

pete

There are 2 oil feed galeries in the block that mate up to matching galleries in the head. They are between #2 & #3 and #4 & #5. Block the rear one and restrict the front one. A piece of brass rod drilled to the right size hole works well as a restrictor.

:( cheers :D

got mine back yesterday, has a very mean "serious business" exhaust note haha.

No boost as yet until it's run in, but even so definatly has more balls than the n/a i drive daily.

Just itching to get some boost into it though. :(

good to hear gav, about time! Can't wait to see it!

Easier to tap the rear for a grub screw or put a solid piece of brass in to plug the hole - than to weld it up.

head restrictors

does anyone have a pick of the hole i have to weld up and the the one i have to put the restirctor in

also when do i get one of these restrictors

pete

Just a question regarding pistons and compression ratio stuff for this conversion. Cubes I think stated a page or so ago that the compression height for a rb30 normally was 1.26". Now the CP pistons for the conversion I got have a compression height according to the spec sheet of 1.28". So my understanding is that the piston will actually sit .020" (.5mm) outside of the bore when at TDC. Is that correct?

They reckon with a 1.2mm (.048") headgasket you should get about 8.3:1, now this worked out in my calcs if the head cc's up to about 64cc. If your head cc's up about 62cc then i think i worked it out to be about 8.5:1CR. I just want to check the formula here so hopefully im working this out right.

CR = 1pot vol+head cc+deck height cc / head cc+deck height cc

So if the piston sits .020" outta the bore then I should take that away from the headgasket thickness im running or plan on running and work it out from there...eg if i used a 1.5mm gasket, minus that .020" i would use 1mm in the equation to work out the CR, even though Im using a 1.5mm gasket.

Does that sound correct? Or have I confused myself here?

I am not 100% sure what the std rb30 comp height is to achieve a zero deck clearance.

The best way to know what comp ratio you will have is to buy your pistons last. Measure everything up then select what pin height etc you require.

I checked acl website and for a set of forged pistons for rb30et they stated on their spec sheet that the compression height is 1.261"

Im assuming the forged piston is just a copy of the std one and maintains all std specs. So 1.26" is pretty close to std.

Most of the pistons mentioned in this thread have different crown design/machining. Some are dished, some raised, some have small valve relief fly cuts, some have large ones. All of these affect the compression ratio.

Compression height is useless without knowing the dome cc's.

:) cheers :P

Most of the pistons mentioned in this thread have different crown design/machining. Some are dished, some raised, some have small valve relief fly cuts, some have large ones. All of these affect the compression ratio.

Compression height is useless without knowing the dome cc's.

:D cheers :)

how do we take the dome cc's into account when measuring the compression ratio

how would using the rb25 pistons also affect them when the block is decked to suit?

The discussion is piston selection for the rb30det.

First thing we need to do is select a suitable compression height which is 1.260". THEN we worry about the dome or negative done to achieve the comp ratio we are after.

Without a dome and zero deck clearance you will be running some where around a 7:1 comp ratio. :

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...