Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went to the 'Dyno B' and got my car

dyno'd. Except i only got about 163rwkw 'Dyno B', unlike 193rwkw which i got at 'Dyno A'.

The guys at 'Dyno B' said that peak power dropped off at about 5000rpm, when it actually

should still be increasing. The only thing i have changed since the first dyno was, i installed a S/S

inlet pipe between AFM & turbo.

The power curve was fine at 'Dyno A'. Have you ever come across this before?

Both dyno runs showed good AFR's.

What would be the more appropriate power output figure for my current mods.

Mods:-

1993 R32 Skyline

RB20DET

Stock internals

5-speed manual

R33 S1 turbo

Trust front mount intercooler

Full exhaust (Split 3' dump/front pipe)

GTR fuel pump

Boost controller running at 14psi

Re-mapped ECU

Air pod

S/S inlet pipe

Edited by lows_13
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166491-power-figure-issue/
Share on other sites

163rwkw sounds realistic

lots of things can affect the readouts, post both dyno sheets

one could have air temp correction, the other might not

one could be in a different gear or different ramp rate etc

Dynos can be calibrated differently therefore showing that some cars have less powerful then they do on a different dyno. The stainless steel intake pipe shouldn't have made any difference as the only problem i've heard of is with the stock plastic one contracting under suction and limiting air flow so if anything the s/s one should be better. my suggestion would be to go back to dyno A and get a re-run on that

most Rb20's with the 25 turbos make any where from 160 to 180 ish rwkw, even more if they are pushed to 14 psi. but for the sake of it we'll assume 12 or so psi.

dont be too fussed about different dyno reads out tho, does the car feel any different on road compared to both dynos?

maybe the stainless inlet pipe has made your car slower/less powerful? I mean if that's the only thing you've changed and your power has gone down... how does it feel to you?

maybe the stainless inlet pipe has made your car slower/less powerful? I mean if that's the only thing you've changed and your power has gone down... how does it feel to you?

Power feels about the same after the S/S inlet mod.

Theres a lot more turbo sucking sound, thats about it.

The ambient temps clearly show the 2 runs weren't done on the same day, probably not even the same month! Is it any wonder then that you encountered differences. Although I would expect the colder day to produce better power.

Are both dynos the same model? Same manufacturer?

They say that each 3 degree increase in intake air temp makes a 1% reduction in power.

So for a 20 degree (at least) increase in temp thats probably 8% power just there, compounded by the hotter air going through the intercooler...

So more like 10-15% power drop from increased temp and your getting to be in the same ballpark kW reading.

Rhett

  • 3 months later...

im going with the 160 mark because near on 200kw? on 14psi with a tiny 2lt engine?? hahah no chance... not with a standard r33 turbo.. ive driven one of those b4 and damn they are torqueless and slow :rofl: sorry dude but theres no chance urs makin near on 200rwkw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It is a kunfine Android screen . Does anyone know the wirering diagram of the fuga ??
    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
×
×
  • Create New...