Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think that old (the larger throttle body does nothing for you is bull) my opinion .

Yeah i agree with ya. Did you see the Autosalon article from ages ago where all they did was a Hypertune throttle upgrade? They left the same sized pipework, just used a silicone reducer and gained 10-15kw through out the rev range and that was on a stock turbo at it's limits. That's decent gains in my books.

  • Replies 539
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In some ways it's like upsizing the turbine. Less restriction to the whole air in / air out process should equal easier power.

Can you post up a decent picture of the throttle cable mount?

ok ill do that for you

Thanks for those - the detail is great. I'm in the same boat as zebra.

Do the angles work ok?

yep you have to bend the bracket a bit also have the bracket a bit sideways make it first then shape it on a belt sander to make it look like its a straight fit,i hope you know what i mean.its has to be at a angle so the cable wont hit the plenum and is straight in front of the throttle body ,also the holes to the bracket make slits so you can move it in the position you need. (belt sander last thing you do)

Edited by WARLORD

Yep, the end result sort of tells the story - I did notice that slight kink.

Searching through my ally and steel supplies I may use either some 50 x 50 x 6 angle ally, or 50 x 6 flat steel as a starting point. Either way should work fairly well, but probably yours as a template is the easiest.

Main point is to get that cable pulling from the right spot, in a fairly straight plane and avoid that bloody kink that I've seen a few people end up with as the cable runs into the plenum.

thanks

With some help from my mate, we knocked up this item. As shown, 90% complete - it needed a slit cut for the cable to slip through, and a coat of paint.

post-19642-1245410121_thumb.jpg

One area we paid attention to was getting a dead straight pull on the throttle linkage. Hopefully our placement of the hole gives a nice sweep for the cable leading up to the bracket.

Bugger all materials used in making the thing, but I don't think it would be easy to get the positions right with manifold and throttle body all bolted up to the engine. Very similar in execution to yours Warlord, and definitely handy to have some fabricating skills.

With some help from my mate, we knocked up this item. As shown, 90% complete - it needed a slit cut for the cable to slip through, and a coat of paint.

post-19642-1245410121_thumb.jpg

One area we paid attention to was getting a dead straight pull on the throttle linkage. Hopefully our placement of the hole gives a nice sweep for the cable leading up to the bracket.

Bugger all materials used in making the thing, but I don't think it would be easy to get the positions right with manifold and throttle body all bolted up to the engine. Very similar in execution to yours Warlord, and definitely handy to have some fabricating skills.

one small but big thing is the cable must sit behind and fit under the plenum look at mine again as the firt one i made would not let the cable fit in with out jamming it in which i do not recomend ill measure the lenght you need it looks close ill let you know tomorrow

Edited by WARLORD
i think that old (the larger throttle body does nothing for you is bull) my opinion .

Did you measure the boost at WOT before the throttle body and found it was higher than the boost after the throttle body, hence proving that the throtte body was a restriction?

I have, at 315 rwkw and guess what? The boost was the same, hence proving that a larger throtte body would have achieved nothing, except waste time and money.

Cheers

Gary

Surely just a boost difference before and after the throttle isn't an indication of whether a throttle body will give gains throughout the rev range :P

It may not be a restriction at those power levels, however it doesn't mean that no more performance can be gained.

If you upgrade the size of the throttle and pipework to suit it can allow more airflow at the same boost pressure does it not?

Airflow (Q) = Velocity (V) x Cross sectional Area (A)

An increase in the cross sectional area at the same velocity means an increase in airflow (CFM). So why would it not make more power, regardless whether it's a "restriction" or not?

I'm an Engineering student so if i am wrong please explain why as i am curious about this whole throttle upgrade.

Here's the Autosalon article i was talking about earlier.

post-35676-1245417489_thumb.jpg

Edited by PM-R33
Did you measure the boost at WOT before the throttle body and found it was higher than the boost after the throttle body, hence proving that the throtte body was a restriction?

I have, at 315 rwkw and guess what? The boost was the same, hence proving that a larger throtte body would have achieved nothing, except waste time and money.

Cheers

Gary

i really think you need to re test.

its not a waste if it is done properly like every mod should be done not just chucking it on and hoping for the best you should know that.

the dyno has increase boost and the car was not even re tuned.

if you are going to turn this into somthing please don't post here as this is my topic with the results i have achieved and i don't want it to turn stupid again.

love always. lol

Nick

Edited by WARLORD
yer that will not work

I got it to work this morning :rofl2: (i have the standard throttle body with adapter though)

its not 100% perfect but pretty damn close.

I had to make a spacer for the accelerator pedal and cable but that was easy enough

Surely just a boost difference before and after the throttle isn't an indication of whether a throttle body will give gains throughout the rev range :rofl2:

It may not be a restriction at those power levels, however it doesn't mean that no more performance can be gained.

That doesnt make sense to me - if it doesnt restrict airflow it is not going to affect power.

If you upgrade the size of the throttle and pipework to suit it can allow more airflow at the same boost pressure does it not?

Airflow (Q) = Velocity (V) x Cross sectional Area (A)

An increase in the cross sectional area at the same velocity means an increase in airflow (CFM). So why would it not make more power, regardless whether it's a "restriction" or not?

You've assumed velocity is constant, which is not true.

I'm an Engineering student so if i am wrong please explain why as i am curious about this whole throttle upgrade.

Each section of the intake path introduces pressure loss (except the compressor of course!) and in some cases the loss introduced by a particular section is negligible, which is what Gary is saying. Checking the boost either side will tell you if there has been pressure loss. Lower pressure = less air mass = less power. If the piping into and out of the throttle are the same ID as the throttle, there's unlikely to be a change of much gain. If you're changing plenum to a larger ID, its likely to help.

Are you studying fluid dynamics at the moment? IIRC that's where this stuff is covered.

Now back on topic: Warlord you're a nut, but in a good way. The car is very nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...