Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Are you sure, i thought S1's didnt have an airbag option and S1.5's came with drivers side standard and passenger as an option and S2 had both standard?

i was only going by this website

http://meggala.com/r33main1.html not the best website example cuz only one picture works. refering more to the info

and fairly sure mines only a series 1 with an airbag steering wheel added as i have to click off the indicators, light coloured seats, front bar, silver S badge on front (maybe photo's might help identify what im talking about)

Edited by BstewyR33
  • 1 month later...

Hey guys i contacted Negun and i was speaking to tom and he told me this even tho its on this topic already

"The difference between the RB25DET series 1 and series 2 are the igniters. The series 1 have separate igniters, where the series 2 are built in. You should be able to tell by looking at the

existing coil packs. Alternatively you could look up the engine number

with Nissan. "

Hey guys i contacted Negun and i was speaking to tom and he told me this even tho its on this topic already

"The difference between the RB25DET series 1 and series 2 are the igniters. The series 1 have separate igniters, where the series 2 are built in. You should be able to tell by looking at the

existing coil packs. Alternatively you could look up the engine number

with Nissan. "

To be more accurate the S1 has an igniter module (not separate igniters) and you can tell the difference by looking at the end of the coil pack cover as that is where the module is mounted, but as you mentioned its already been detailed in this thread.

Edited by W0rp3D
  • 2 months later...

Not sure if this has been covered, only a little difference but in the centre console of Series 1's before 1995 (No Drivers Airbag) the compartment in the centre console is bigger as there was no need to accomidate the air bag module which is there in later models with airbags.

Q; What is the difference between a series 1 and series 2 R33 Gtst?

A; There are several differences...

  • The front end of the series 2 is sharper, slimmer headlights, different front bar (indicators and fog lights are round and located at the bottom of the bar). The bonnet has much sharper ridges.
  • The "skyline" panel at the rear of the car is body coloured on the series 2.
  • The interior of the series 2 has been updated including different trim, a passenger airbag and the dash facia has been updated.
  • Mechanical differences include an updated ECU and a ceramic turbo.
  • The series 1 was in production from late '93 through to late '95. The series 2 ran from early '96 through to early/mid '98.

so if i wanted to put the front bar of a series 2 R33 on a series 1 R33 what else would i need to change?

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Differences also include the 40th annv stitching in the seats lol if you've got one..

nismo front bar, rear sway bar in boot, gtr rear wing, sunroof, hicas..

i'm sure these cross into SI and SII - depends on what the original owner got factory..

also what about HICAS - do SI have hicas?

series 2 dont come with sway bars! or gtr wings standard, my r33 series 1 93 doesnt have hicas, my series 2 does, maybe the 2 door skylines have hicas? my bro's 93 2 door had hicas

Bullshit, you don't need to do guards. I've done it :D

maybe in the 2 door theyre not different buddy lmfao!

i own a series one and two both 4 doors, the series 2 HAS PUMPED GUARDS on the 4 door the whole front is BETTER than the series 1 looks way stauncher (tougher looking in nz language) haha but you need some TEIN adjustables to really apprecitae a series 2, rear tail lights are interchangeable aswell as the coloured middle piece, bonnet is also different.

Castor rods are different, well, --the bushes are twic the size way tougher.

front shocks are different

interior in a series 2 is like a 2002 berlina in comparison to the 86 lookin series 1!!

HICAS SYSTEMS (rear) are different series 2 has SUPER HICAS electric, and speed sensitive electronically controlled?

i was under the understanding that the series 2 turbo had ball bearings or sumin, and was a lil bigger.

series 2 also has Variable Valve Timing hence the non interchangeability of INtake? cam? not sure on which cam exactly, and is slightly at factory more kilowatts about ten or fifteen more??? and way better on petrol!!!!!

Series 2 4 Doors look better than all! dont mean to be a hater, Have to be sacked on sum quality adjustables like teins or sumin tho!!!!! and deep blue colour with sum DTM drifts 10 inch wide on the rear and 9 inch wide on the front

Edited by justabitbigga

not quite true as other people have said. s1.5 are s2 engine and wing, s1 interior (with 1 or 2 small changes) and body. not sure about 4 doors though

there is no m-spec front bumper for the r33. m-spec is a r34 gtr model. however there is a type-m r33 though. this is pretty much every r33 gts-t, except some of the turbo 4 doors.

as people have said, the afm, ignitor/coils, turbo compressor wheel (s1 has steel, s2 has nylon), TPS

ecu's are interchangable. i have done it

They are NOT interchangeable they may plug up but the ignition and the Variable Valve timing wont be good for your series 1 bra!!!!! itd be like my mate running his de on a sohc ecu!!!!!!!!!! u must have some good problems????!!!!!! i have a series one and a series 2! both 4 doors however

S2 FTW, interior is such a better design from S1.

The exterior is way better too! series ones look stingray like all round and shyt, series 2 especially 4 door are so much more devious and aggressively styled with deeper more dominant style lines,(in saying that all skylines look like arse if theyre not on adjustables and have dark tints and fat popping out rims! grandmothers have them in my town! lmao! and a cat back exhaust at the least! nothing worse than a noiseless skidda! can i get a amen! hahahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...