Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Theres most likely a topic on this already, but i can't find it. What figures (Lts/100) do you achieve from your v35s...

I havent seen many 3000cc and 2500cc v's but a comparison between the three engines including the 3500cc would be good.

Also what trans do you have? Manual, 5speed or 8 speed Auto.

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174721-v35-sedan-fuel-economy/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have a v35 coupe 350GT

according to the onboard computer, i was getting about 10 km/L

this equates to around 700 kms per tank

considering my R32 was getting about 250kms per tank, i am pretty happy :thumbsup:

edit: that's with the 5-speed auto btw...

Edited by WazR32GTSt
i have a v35 coupe 350GT

according to the onboard computer, i was getting about 10 km/L

this equates to around 700 kms per tank

considering my R32 was getting about 250kms per tank, i am pretty happy :)

edit: that's with the 5-speed auto btw...

From what people have told me litre's per 100 klm's for the 2.5 and 3 litre is 8 to 9, 3.5 in 5 and 8 speed 9 to 11 and mine being 6 speed manual and a lot of fun with the VDC off I am getting 10 to 12.

Are you talking combined as in city/hwy driving or just city??

huge difference from what i have read

5 speed is a regular auto transmission

8 speed is a CVT transmission which is totally different - it doesn't have gears and works on pulley's or something like that . you will have to research that yourself... this only comes on sedans

yeah i was pleasently surprised with the economy too.. when i was cruising on the highway i actually reset the fuel calculator average and it shot up to like 14km/L and said i would get 850-900kms out of the tank. but that was literally cruising in 5th on the highway and not a real life situation

i think its reasonable to think that (According to the onboard fuel computer) to get > 10mk/L highway and around 5-8km/L city depending on how urban your environment is..

this is for 350GT anyway, would be interesting to contrast to the CVT model and to the sedans with the 3L and 2.5L engines...

cheers,

Warren

those units are in km/L

as in how many kilometres every litre of fuel will take you

so the higher the number the more fuel efficient...

the only reason i quoted those figures is because that's what the onboard computer shows when you are watching fuel economy

pretty impressive figures boys(bit different to the rb's eh), what are they like when your going pretty hard do they still give you good consumption, obviously they are going to use more but is it outrageous like rb's

ps the more i look at v35's the more i like em...might try and source a black or white coupe and fit a nice body kit and then theres the turbo kit :domokun::blush: hope my wife dose'nt read this

turn good figures, obviously they going to use more but is consumption still good, nothing radical like rb's

I think the consumption is ok as my RB25DET Neo runs at less then 10l/100km when doing full hwy and around town like 12-13l/100km. I do currently bit of city and hwy 5 days a week and it runs at 10l/100km. But yes V35's are starting to grow on me as well - the sedans are a bit selective in taste but the coupes for sure.

  • 2 months later...

300 GT 5 Speed Auto.

9.2 9.5 Litres Per 100Km's

City driving we see 640 per tank within +/- 15 Kms

Highway 740 Kms Blew my mind, done this three times now...

Perth - Albany and almost 3/4 back!!!

Interesting thread guys.

Sorry if I missed it, but does anyone have a 350 GT-8 Sedan that can provide some feedback on how thirsty it is on fuel?

Im due to pickup my V35 in a week, hopefully its a touch more efficient than my R32 GTS-T is :)

Nick

You got one, congrats Nick! You'll love it.

Mine does between 14.5-15.5L /100KM, about 550+KM per 80L tank consistantly with city driving and lots of go.

Logged it into a spreadsheet for a while to check and it never really changed much. Best I got was 13.8 when I really babied it to see if it made a difference.

Haven't done much highway though.

I filled the 350GT Auto Coupe up yesterday - made it drink 70.16L ($99.19!). Previous to that I got about 560km with a few squirts here and there and now the display is thinking I will get about 600km to a tank. Im happy with that! My old Cefiro was about 400km for $82 or so. I claim mileage too, so potential earnings are now

400km @ $82 = $264 Return

600km @ $99 = $396 Return

JK

You got one, congrats Nick! You'll love it.

Mine does between 14.5-15.5L /100KM, about 550+KM per 80L tank consistantly with city driving and lots of go.

Logged it into a spreadsheet for a while to check and it never really changed much. Best I got was 13.8 when I really babied it to see if it made a difference.

Haven't done much highway though.

Hey dude, cheers :D

If yours is the same colour as the one in your avatar, we will be twins

550km's per tank city driving is a hell of a lot more respectable than what im used too with my GTR or GTS-T

actually you'll probably find it a bit thirstier than the GTST, but much less thirstier than the GTR. 15L/100 is not that hot. not terrible, but not fantastic either. a decent 32 GTST will be around the 13L/100 mark.

what size is the tank? if your 4 door 35 really is 80L and i'm pretty sure a 32 GTST is only around 50 or 60l max then it's not much of a comparison.

saying I get XXX 'per tank' is a dumb way of measuring stuff. 1 tank is not a defined amount. it could be 30 litres, it could be 100 litres so it has no meaning. litres per hundred km is the ONLY way to judge fuel economy. and like I said a 32 GTST should be around 12-13 L/100.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...