Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lets just say you barely drove the car if you didnt get over 50...! i got a s1 auto, microtech, catback, split dump and pod filter 171rwkw, and it well and truely toasts 265s in 2nd gear, and thats only playing with it, each to there own, i love my auto.. and i have a 400hp manual vl in the shed, love that too, its 2 different driving styles between manual or auto

then you need better tyres.

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

auto or manual at 171kw you shouldn't be frying 265s. you might spin them or chirp them but not fry them. and just cause they are new doesn't mean they are good. and cheap falkens are crap.

or you suspension setup might not be that good for traction.

oh you mean when it clicks up into second while doing a skid? yeah thats nothing special.

another reason why manuals acelerate quicker is that that have shorter ratios. shorter ratios accelerate quicker, but you just have to change gears a bit sooner. that is probably how you guys with the autos can be as quick of quicker than the manuals, since they have to change into 4th, but if you got to a point where yours had to change then you would be slower. that is a reason why the manual commodores are quicker to 100kmh that the falcons but slower over the 1/4. the commodores can do just over 100kmh in second but the falcons have to use 3rd, but over the 1/4 they are both in 4th gear.

and another thing about the auto gear changes. the ferrari auto boxes only change as fast as a manual. the old ones were slower. some guys driving them in the GT Production series were trying to get manual ones cause the auto change was slower than the manual.

oh you mean when it clicks up into second while doing a skid? yeah thats nothing special.

another reason why manuals acelerate quicker is that that have shorter ratios. shorter ratios accelerate quicker, but you just have to change gears a bit sooner. that is probably how you guys with the autos can be as quick of quicker than the manuals

nothing special huh.

so can you do a burnout in third with your manual with less then 200kws?

i think you should read the crap that your dribbling before you hit "add reply".

worded very poorly.

nothing special huh.

no, nothing special. my old vx commodore could spin a pair of 245's in second and it was a stock v6. and my mates stock 5.0L vn wagon will fry the tyres in 3rd at 130kmh.

so can you do a burnout in third

why 3rd? second in an auto isn't equal to third in a manual. but with 200rwkw i could do a skid on the spot starting in 2nd, and then click it up to 3rd. or i could go along at about 40kmh in second, heel/toe the brake and the accelerator and kick the clutch and get the tyres frying then grab 3rd. hell even the missus has had her pulsar bagging up 3rd gear (it's amazing what women can do when you piss them off enough)

I'm on boost in the manual by around 15-20km/h (not full boost, but making boost)

The auto you can have boosting easily on the spot if you know how

you can also get a manual to be on boost on the spot if you know how too. you load it up on the handbrake.

The default speed-limit applying to a driver for a length of road in a built-up area is 60 kilometres per hour.

probably cost about 2k. trying to find a cheap manual box is hard. most wreckers want about $1300 for one. then you have to get a pedal box, tailshaft, clutch, flywheel (all dependent on how much you get with the box)

Couldnt imagine driving an auto again....learn to drive in one, first car was auto and id never go back....

i'm in the same boat.. at the start i was just too lazy to get a manual license.. now i regret waiting so long ..

Gotta love the try hards in their low powered GTSt's claiming they are gods gift to racing and knowing all about performance and driving.

So my credentials: 22 years motor racing in rally, formula ford, sports sedans, more rally, sprints yadayadayada. I teach people to drive, both defensive and offensive and Tanks and Heavy double articulated and Wreckers. I'm a mechanic and an Engineer (weapons specialisation but also for a couple of V8SC teams). I own a GTS25t race car running a 26/30 engine, a 500hp GTR and I just sold a GTS25t Auto. I am pretty certain I can drive OK and know what it takes to make a car go hard. I am not some unknown from Gympie that the other liner owners have never noticed :rofl: (Hell yeah mad082, PSI has never seen you at one of their skidpan events, he claims to not ever see you)

So my second favourite car in the stable, even though it was hard to appreciate it in 5 cars with varying applications was the auto. My wife drove it easily, it chirped second and if I wasn't a dedicated trackie it would have been a great performer to tackle the strip. The box can handle 300rwkw as Dangerman has demonstrated and you only ever get from a car what you put into it.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with owning an auto. The only reason I sold mine was to get an auto XR8 ute to tow my half cabin 18ft boat and the wife made that decision. She decided to keep the V8 Soarer until her 350GT is purchased. BTW it will also be an auto. CVT8 if you can work that out.

So for the diehard manual guys........post some laptimes at race tracks. I'd suggest a decent steerer would waste you in an auto with less power. If you aren't tackling a race track regularly and claim you are a great driver you are just playing with yourselves and being the usual street racer wankers.

And mad082, I'm calling you out in particular. We have a racetrack down here. Feel free to turn up. Basically sunshine...put up or shut up... or stay in whoretown and continue pretending. I'm taking the 26/30 out for shakedown next Thurs and I'm sure Paul has spots free so put your hand up.

(Hell yeah mad082, PSI has never seen you at one of their skidpan events, he claims to not ever see you)

that's cause i have never been to one of his events (never entered one atleast). i go to the cooloola car club motorkanas, which i never see him at, infact i never even see him out on the road. the reason i don't go to his events is that they are on a saturday and i work saturdays. i have been out and watched some of them after work though. plus i haven't owned my skyline since january this year.

And mad082, I'm calling you out in particular. We have a racetrack down here. Feel free to turn up. Basically sunshine...put up or shut up... or stay in whoretown and continue pretending. I'm taking the 26/30 out for shakedown next Thurs and I'm sure Paul has spots free so put your hand up.

i've been down to willowbank and put my current car down. but it isn't a racetrack monster. it is a fwd magna, so there is no point putting it round a track. plus i don't have a spare $100 to pay for fuel and entry.

and when did i say i was some crash hot racer? i just said i could do a skid. it isn't rocket science. look at all the bogans in commodores that do it. if even they can do it it can't be that hard.

Stick to your Magna then mate. I don't think you are in much of any sort of position to tell people whether an auto Skyline rates or not. As for tracking a car, it doesn't matter what you have, you can still get it out there. I done sprints in little Lasers and Corollas just for the hell of it. Plenty of guys track their "crappo" auto Skylines too and do just fine too so a Magna would be nothing out of the ordinary. I've even seen V8 Soarers at Phillip Island doing times some of the Skylines were.

Auto Skylines are seriously underrated........ but usually by the people with no track time to speak of. If you think you are using your Manual car to its potential on the roads you either have little idea of performance or you need to be locked up. The track is the only place to know.

Lighting the bags is either as a result of decent power, or in most cases a combination of crap tyres and even worse suspension setup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...