Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive done a few searches around and come up empty handed so ill make it simple...

What flow is better though your intake piping turbulent or laminar (straight, smooth flow)???

in my opinion and this is just assuming so correct me if i'm wrong laminar flow would allow a quicker flow through your intake piping/cooler ect. however turbulent flow would give a better fuel mixture but slow the flow of the air going through your intake...

or does it make no difference... what sort of power figures do people start worrying about these issues?? or dont they??? im guessing it would do sweet "f" all to a shitbox hyundai or sumthing....

cheers Rick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186718-laminar-flow-vs-turbulent-flow/
Share on other sites

from the logic thats twirling around in my head i think that the intake will need to be laminar so the turbo picks it up easier. wont a turbulent intake cause some kind of restriction?

as for the intercooler pipes.. the air is pressurised so luminar or turbulent airflow isnt really an issue because you really just want the quickest easiest flow.

the air is made turbulant to mix with the fuel by the intake port as it is quite . some people out there dont port and polish the intake side because they believe that the air is made turbulent before it enters the combustion chamber by how coarse it is. the exhaust side is usually ported and polished more to help the air escape more efficiently.

but thats just what i have made sense of, and what makes sense to me.

from what i can figure stright smooth flowing would be more benificial... i know it defiantly is on the exhaust side hence why mandrel bent is preffered to make it flow faster. I presume it would do the same on the intake and more flow = more power (from what i know anyways) please correct me if im wrong : )

In an ideal world I think you will find laminar flow will provide the lowest pressure drop for a given volume of fluid moved at a given velocity.

With a car I think you will find space governs how far you can go.

Remember bigger is not always better as with a forced induction engine you have the interia of the air mass you are pushing through the system to overcome. ie really big intercooler, pipe and intake volumes will increase lag time as you have to get all that mass moving.

Sharp changes in direction, edges, gasket ridges,etc all promote turbulent behaviour so minimising those all helps no matter what system. ie match porting and so on.

Hope this helps

Cheers

even on the pressurised side you don't want turbulent flow. turbulant flow can generate heat aswell as pressure drop and resitriction. and heat is one thing that we don't want. on the intake turbulance could in worst case senario create somewhat of a restriction of flow. i'd say for and intake pipe least amount of bends, if bends are needed don't make them sharp, if welding the pipes try to smooth out the welds/slag on the inside.

may or may not be directly related to what you guys are talking about

but, alot of newer cars now that are emissions friendly, have tumble or swirl valves to help air fuel mix and gain better emissions and lower fuel economy.

on the honda lean burn engines, they close one valve altogether to aid swirl and they run 22:1 air fuel ratio under light cruise conditions.

all the above is good, but hard to implement in the aftermarket so your stuck with the base motor you have from factory.

when i was doing my work experience for school and my VET Course (automotive servicing and repair) at a mitsubishi dealership/service centre a few mechanics and i were talking about this (intake manifolds tho) and they all said with a turbocharged engines there needs to be some turbulance in the intake manifold so dont get the intake manifold smoothed and polished etc.

hope that helps even if its not about intake piiping but the manifold lol :)

but witht the pipin i would guess you would want it smooth and then have turbulance in the intake manifold.

turbuant. laminar flow is not benificial for intake. the more turbulant it is the better cylinder filling you get. remember the intake flow is pulsed. so if its wirling around it grabs the most posible thats available. thats also the same principle for larger intke plemums. its got more reserve to grab.

Having super smooth walls on air passages can actually cause a drop in flow because the air 'sticks' to the walls.

You need enough 'roughness' on the walls to allow some turbulance to assist the flow. This isn't to say that a cast finish on the inside of your head is a good thing, but something you can see a reflection of yourself in can be a bad thing.

Turbulent flow can assist in fuel mixing, and the new 2.0 Litre TFSI (Turbo Fuel Stratified Injection) Golf GTI engine features valves in the head which open and close according to the power requirements, closing when low flow is required for better velocity of air, and opening when high power is required for more volume of air.

These valves are infinitely adjustable, and actually between the plenum and the head ports.

i'm with dave.

turbulent flows provides the swirl is to aid in homogenising the mixture so i'd think it's a good thing entering the cylinder.

i would have thought the smoother the intercooler pipe work the higher the flow, roughening the walls slows the flow.

BMW F1 turbo engines had intercooler piping with fine ridges on the inner radius of their bends. this was done to slow the air down slightly here as this maintains a more laminar flow.

I’m no engineer, but i would have thought large scale turbulence anywhere would increase pumping losses regardless, its just the stronger and more complete mixture burn from a thoroughly even mixture of fuel and air negates this loss.

Some are assuming the only cause and assister of turbulence in the chamber is the inertia of it entering past the intake valves. The act of the chamber floor (piston top) going through BDC and then squashing the charge against the head chamber itself, creates the more substantial eddy currents (swirling from centre to outside) I believe. Due to laminar skin friction, the pressure front caused by the piston is centred in the middle, it hits the spark plug and flows outwards (like a outwardly flowing vortex in a smoke ring) I saw a video when I was a kid of glass cylindered combustion motor that BMW made. Watching the combustion of this vortex of fuel and air was quiet beautiful.

With the above in mind, turbo motors with 1.7bar boost levels and fuel at over almost 70psi rail pressure don’t need excess turbulence, the nature of high RPM air speeds, boost and the turbulent effect of in chamber mixture compression does this for us.

Added turbulence through swirl inducers and phased intake valve opening is clearly to aid tumble and roll at low air speeds. Manufactures do it for emissions mostly, hence why id suggest in the in high performance world, inducing turbulence isn’t really needed (when in comparison to the negative effect it could have at higher engine speeds)

Sticking to the high performance at high engine speeds theme, full blow turbulence isn’t required in an intercooler as the natural resultant increase of surface areas when the intake charge goes down each intercooler runner is enough. Iv personally seen a fair few different variances of “in runner” turbulators. I think it was the TX5 turbo which had quiet evasive and restricting looking little devices. I would think there would be a pretty clear weighting in of “Turbulence at low air speeds for increased heat transfer VS Increased drag at high airspeeds”

On a final thought, remember surface irregularities can be used to reduce friction and increase flow over a surface. The dimples in golf balls, and knives use this.

Eddy producing dimples can also increase heat transfer measurements without the large expectant increase in drag as per >> http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMCFD03_...PV2003_3964.pdf

All my morning cents gone :D

Edited by GeeTR

My 2c , laminer flow because the shortest distance between two points is the direct path . Turbulent air or fliud has to go further because the direction its moving in is not necessarily the shortest distance if you know what I mean .

Barrier flow . Fluid/gas tends to form a slow or non moving layer against a rough surface and it sort of lubricates the main flow mass from the barriers surface . Heat exchangers such as intercoolers/coolant radiators/oil coolers have "turbulators" inside their tubes to add a lot of surface area for extra exposure to the gas/liquid beeing cooled . Its the reason why a core with lots of narrow tubes works better than a core with fewer large tubes - note intercoolers made from truck cores with large tubes , great for flow but often not the best for heat transfer .

The effects of swirl and fuel/air mixing is largely up to how the ports and valves are designed - most production inlet manifolds seem to have the injectors close to the head so much of the inlet manifold is said to be "dry" air only . Wet systems ie single point EFI or Carburettor/s have a few more issues with keeping the fuel in suspension with the charge air .

There are some big advantages with GDI or gasoline direct injection because the system become more like a Diesel in that the whole inlet tract is dry . You don't have to time the injection to have any bearing on fuel being carried into the cylinders - its already there . There is also the sizable advantage of being able to control inlet air throttling purely with the inlet valves though thats pretty complex in itself . More potential VE .

Cheers A .

Cool, we all agreence then hahaha. Laminar flow everywhere is wanted in a performance environment, as designing for turbulence at low speeds at the sacrifice of high rpm power is for gurls.

Disco - do you really think though that simple intake valve alterations are the biggest determintor manufactures use to promote swirl? I still would have though it to be chamber / piston design; keeping in mind too much swirl at high speeds cause the charge to reach super sonic speeds and increases chance of uncontrolled ignition.

Gday just skipped a few reply's so hope no ones allready talked about it. That is a swirl air thing. My dad was gunna buy a swirl air for his camry intake as he does alot of long distance driving to try for better fuel economy. He didnt buy one but instead copied the design and made one out of a baby food can and a drink can( not recomended for forced induction). Not sure exactly how he made it but it just sits in the intake pipe and the fins inside (almost like turbo wheel blades) make the air twirl before entering the intake. He now gets better fuel economy on his trips down south. So yeah I think turbulant is better for combustion.

Gday just skipped a few reply's so hope no ones allready talked about it. That is a swirl air thing. My dad was gunna buy a swirl air for his camry intake as he does alot of long distance driving to try for better fuel economy. He didnt buy one but instead copied the design and made one out of a baby food can and a drink can( not recomended for forced induction). Not sure exactly how he made it but it just sits in the intake pipe and the fins inside (almost like turbo wheel blades) make the air twirl before entering the intake. He now gets better fuel economy on his trips down south. So yeah I think turbulant is better for combustion.

Gday,

Ups to your dad, nice work! Though theres no doubt bit of extra turbulence helps at low rpm with economy. Its if it's warranted on forced induction motors at the expense of power / det at high revs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...