Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Youse guys should not get upset.

he makes a good point.

there are alot of 14 second GTST's out there thinking they are great.

*no flame suit required*

oi! you leave us 14 second gts-t'ers alone! we dont all have a million bucks to spend.

plus you gota start somewhere.

as for cordiaboy, he wears his undies on the outside!

tool... :D

hmmm..

89 r32 GTST = 1290kg

92 r32 GTST = 1320kg

84 AB cordia = 960kg and 110kw.

that is on 7psi and no intercoolah uleh!

this doesn't change the fact that they are a shit heap and the guy really has problems.

I want to choke the guy as much as the next person, but his shit box does make a point.

90kw... but whateva

I think he's great.

He has knobs like you guys and people on other forums in a tizzy because of his cordia.

He's probably laughing at you right now while reading threads like this.

I think he's great, good comic value.

I have met this roger cordia in person and to all the ppl which think he is joking he is not , he really thinks his cordia is an enzo , 911 and a veyron all rolled in to one

I met him at wakefield on a track day where he told us he would be doing 1:05`s , his best time was 1:25 and i think that lap was when his car broke down and the F100 ute tow him back to the pits

AND

His heat shield for his pod was a "for sale" sign stolen from some house

he's my hero.

any douchebag that goes on a prius forum and brags how his car can beat a prius deserves my 5 seconds of attention.

http://priuschat.com/index.php?showtopic=35562

"I had two cordias but recently i sold one of them so that leaves me with one cordia which i have now but i wouldve had two if i havent sold the other one"

hahahahahahaha.... why you so like that one.

That him reasoning to himself. His brain works in a funny way.....grade 1 style. 1+1=2, 2-1=1......

Meh.. Leave him be..

In the vid he showed an avg. of 14.5 sec GTST's..

Yes there are MUCH quicker GTST's..

Yes he COULD have a 13 sec cordia

Yes his sister and his mother are the same person.. But who cares?

I say let him brag on the hybrid car forums. At least he is quicker than cars that run off cow farts..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...