Jump to content
SAU Community

88mph...you Know What Happens Then!


Recommended Posts

Here's something that would rate at least 10,000 mega-fonzies!!!

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Delorean_W0QQitemZ1...1QQcmdZViewItem

And of course you can now buy brand new ones!!!

http://www.delorean.com/index.asp

If i had the cash to splash, i'd be definatley geeting one. I have actually seen one down on City rd, Sth Melb once... they make a weird noise/idle sound.... i did'nt know what it was, as i was washing my car at the time, then i heard this very raspy gurgling sound, then i saw this silver thing backing up.... and there it was a RHD Delorean! :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/198743-88mphyou-know-what-happens-then/
Share on other sites

what a piece of crap. arent they made in mexico? if not, they look like they are

ha...that should be put in an SAU Christmas book of quotes.

for 60k id want the food processor strapped to the back and a cool neon flux capacitor. did they ever come in any other colour than silver?

ha...that should be put in an SAU Christmas book of quotes.

for 60k id want the food processor strapped to the back and a cool neon flux capacitor. did they ever come in any other colour than silver?

They only came in silver because the body is actually brushed stainless steel, not painted.

Though I think there were 3 of them built that were gold plated.

post-30276-1198377322_thumb.jpg

Beautiful machine man..

To the fool who refers to this unique car as rubbish needs to wash his mouth with a bar of soap and smack some sense in to him self. It was produced in North Ireland, some had a V6 Twin Turbo.

Edited by Barbarian
Beautiful machine man..

To the fool who refers to this unique car as rubbish needs to wash his mouth with a bar of soap and smack some sense in to him self. It was produced in North Ireland, some had a V6 Twin Turbo.

it's still a piece of crap. looks MEXICAN to me. ;)

must agree not the best looking car ive ever seen.. are they a quick car... ive never heard of one lol

Have you been living under a rock? They are so quick they can travel thru time -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_the_future

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...