Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So a stock looking and sounding GT-R with 400 + kw's at the treds....

must be a lie only people in nsw could pull this off.... or maybe its on autosalon's dyno ?

Did someone say that top gear should road test this standard gt-r ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652784
Share on other sites

Assuming this is legit, this must be up there with Giants BNR32 results. "N1's" (Undoubtedly modified) with greater then stock response, 400rwkw and 10s quarters?

Makes ppl that fit singles, wanting less then 400kw's look like monkeys haahahah.

...Still in shock with a whiff of denial, I am.

Edited by GeeTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652796
Share on other sites

There are enough subtle things going on in the engine bay to know this is genuine. Go to Vic race tracks to see some of the RPM built GTRs doing there thing and you will be amazed by how quiet the cars are. A result of the in house exhaust development. You see how quick they are and thats a result of the chassis, engine, braking, cooling development that RPM have done on the GTR.

I say hats off to a local workshop wearing the huge expense of development and showing an amazing level of ingenuity. Rather then just slapping a catalogue of Japanese brand names on it and hoping that it works, or assuming that Aus Engineering/Tuning is inferior to Japanese so not worth the bother.

Personally it sux to see the GTRs going so quick becuase i have to admit to myself that deep down i want one :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652829
Share on other sites

  Roy said:
I say hats off to a local workshop wearing the huge expense of development and showing an amazing level of ingenuity. Rather then just slapping a catalogue of Japanese brand names on it and hoping that it works, or assuming that Aus Engineering/Tuning is inferior to Japanese so not worth the bother.

:) 100% :D

I've personally only realised more recently, the insane levels of expense required by shops (So, not just experimenting on various customers "no budget" project car)

The cash equates into nothing more then knowledge to put into another customers car.

People often whinge when shops lock ECU's or don't divulge certain details of setup. "Its my car dammit" they say. Often certain tricks can make or break a setup; differentiate it from the pack. Big shops aren't around to fluff you, they run a business.

What ever they are doing, should be kept tight to their chest.

Respect

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652848
Share on other sites

Just put the figures into the dyno comparison tool http://sau.garagespank.com/login.php it's very impressive to say the least.. My car was running race fuel octane with plenty of timing and it still doesnt have anywhere near the down low power...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653299
Share on other sites

The way the dyno operator loads the car up also makes a huge difference to the look of the curve.

I've came to the conclusion that its near impossible to compare a curve in a true sense.

Mine for example during tuning was seeing 225rwkw at 4000rpm with 1bar; a usual shootout mode power run where you'd nail the throttle at 2000rpm and by 4000rpm we would only see 190rwkw.

But none the less this gtr does have it. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653309
Share on other sites

  RPMGTR said:
Check out this engine for area under the curve.

Goes like no other RB we have ever seen!

Sounds like a dream??? photoshop??

I can assure you it is for real!

Hopefully there is more to come so stay tuned...

MORE PIC'S Dammit!!!!!!!!!

Top results!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653385
Share on other sites

Well done Ben...top stuff. Very similar to our 20psi BP98 run at Autosalon Newcastle. You have better down low (i suspect my GT-RS turbo's might be a little laggier than what you have fitted), mines a bit harder midrange but with the same top-end. Good comparo as yours is not finally tuned, ours was ran-in the day before and still with a very safe tune. If someone would like to re-plot our graph over Bens so its easier to look at feel free.

GO THE LOW-MOUNTS!!

post-23582-1203298122_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653461
Share on other sites

  R31Nismoid said:
Its a 2.9ltr Joel (same as thread title, RB29) :D

That it is buddy. :P

Mark99 used a destroked rb30 crank with rods and custom pistons in an rb26 block to obtain 2.9ltrs. Very similar result.

Curious if this is how they are also doing it.

150rwkw off the bat at 2600rpm is impressive. Its pretty much the same as my stock rb20det turbo'd rb30det was making without loading the car up prior to starting the power run. With the GT30 with 1bar it doesn't make 150rwkw until 3000rpm if you don't load it up prior. hence my comment of how a car is loaded up makes a huge difference to the look of area under the curve. IMO. :whistling:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653494
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...