Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So a stock looking and sounding GT-R with 400 + kw's at the treds....

must be a lie only people in nsw could pull this off.... or maybe its on autosalon's dyno ?

Did someone say that top gear should road test this standard gt-r ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652784
Share on other sites

Assuming this is legit, this must be up there with Giants BNR32 results. "N1's" (Undoubtedly modified) with greater then stock response, 400rwkw and 10s quarters?

Makes ppl that fit singles, wanting less then 400kw's look like monkeys haahahah.

...Still in shock with a whiff of denial, I am.

Edited by GeeTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652796
Share on other sites

There are enough subtle things going on in the engine bay to know this is genuine. Go to Vic race tracks to see some of the RPM built GTRs doing there thing and you will be amazed by how quiet the cars are. A result of the in house exhaust development. You see how quick they are and thats a result of the chassis, engine, braking, cooling development that RPM have done on the GTR.

I say hats off to a local workshop wearing the huge expense of development and showing an amazing level of ingenuity. Rather then just slapping a catalogue of Japanese brand names on it and hoping that it works, or assuming that Aus Engineering/Tuning is inferior to Japanese so not worth the bother.

Personally it sux to see the GTRs going so quick becuase i have to admit to myself that deep down i want one :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652829
Share on other sites

I say hats off to a local workshop wearing the huge expense of development and showing an amazing level of ingenuity. Rather then just slapping a catalogue of Japanese brand names on it and hoping that it works, or assuming that Aus Engineering/Tuning is inferior to Japanese so not worth the bother.

:) 100% :D

I've personally only realised more recently, the insane levels of expense required by shops (So, not just experimenting on various customers "no budget" project car)

The cash equates into nothing more then knowledge to put into another customers car.

People often whinge when shops lock ECU's or don't divulge certain details of setup. "Its my car dammit" they say. Often certain tricks can make or break a setup; differentiate it from the pack. Big shops aren't around to fluff you, they run a business.

What ever they are doing, should be kept tight to their chest.

Respect

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3652848
Share on other sites

Just put the figures into the dyno comparison tool http://sau.garagespank.com/login.php it's very impressive to say the least.. My car was running race fuel octane with plenty of timing and it still doesnt have anywhere near the down low power...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653299
Share on other sites

The way the dyno operator loads the car up also makes a huge difference to the look of the curve.

I've came to the conclusion that its near impossible to compare a curve in a true sense.

Mine for example during tuning was seeing 225rwkw at 4000rpm with 1bar; a usual shootout mode power run where you'd nail the throttle at 2000rpm and by 4000rpm we would only see 190rwkw.

But none the less this gtr does have it. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653309
Share on other sites

Check out this engine for area under the curve.

Goes like no other RB we have ever seen!

Sounds like a dream??? photoshop??

I can assure you it is for real!

Hopefully there is more to come so stay tuned...

MORE PIC'S Dammit!!!!!!!!!

Top results!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653385
Share on other sites

Well done Ben...top stuff. Very similar to our 20psi BP98 run at Autosalon Newcastle. You have better down low (i suspect my GT-RS turbo's might be a little laggier than what you have fitted), mines a bit harder midrange but with the same top-end. Good comparo as yours is not finally tuned, ours was ran-in the day before and still with a very safe tune. If someone would like to re-plot our graph over Bens so its easier to look at feel free.

GO THE LOW-MOUNTS!!

post-23582-1203298122_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653461
Share on other sites

Its a 2.9ltr Joel (same as thread title, RB29) :D

That it is buddy. :P

Mark99 used a destroked rb30 crank with rods and custom pistons in an rb26 block to obtain 2.9ltrs. Very similar result.

Curious if this is how they are also doing it.

150rwkw off the bat at 2600rpm is impressive. Its pretty much the same as my stock rb20det turbo'd rb30det was making without loading the car up prior to starting the power run. With the GT30 with 1bar it doesn't make 150rwkw until 3000rpm if you don't load it up prior. hence my comment of how a car is loaded up makes a huge difference to the look of area under the curve. IMO. :whistling:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/2/#findComment-3653494
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...