Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But its a GTR, it will still do big ends.

But seriously on the matter of gearboxes, does anyone know the system in the Lambos/R8s etc? They are awd so woudl be itneresting to hear how they have put up with 2 years of use with the extra load on them from the AWD

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It really is a shame that as soon as tyre manufacturers start making semi slicks big enough for the R35 that ppl are going to have to remove the engine and install custom sumps with baffles, as new R35s spinning big end bearings isnt good for them . Great to see they are keeping the spinning bottom end history of the GTR alive

Hahahaha you are a funny unit Troy :blink:

Not sure on the wear on them but from reputable articles I've read on the Lambo E-gear suggests that you don't tick the option box if you intend on tracking it as it isn't the best bit of gear. I have read that they are improving it though....

A reasonable period of time?

The engineering world has been using it for almost as long as there has been GT-R's.

It is nothing new.

Since I am not an engineer or experienced with plasma coating, I am relegated to using evidence-based practice. So I did a search in using plasma coatings with an automotive application. The above excerpt from a research article was the closest I could come to how Nissan was using the technology.

This was the historical use of plasma coating in automotive.

The technology of plasma sprayed coating has been introduced in series production for very different types of engines:

- LUPO gasoline FSI 1.4 l of VW in 2000

- V 10 TDI diesel of VW in 2001

- Go-Kart racing engine four strokes in 2000

- Formula1 and Formula3 for racing in 1999

- Motorcycle engine in 2000

- Large volume I5, I6 diesel for VW in 2002

Additionally several prototypes of modern gasoline and diesel engines are now involved in long term testing. The test results have been confirmed in Europe and Japan by several engine manufacturers.

It's interesting that it took so long to be applied to the automotive industry as it appears to be a fairly inexpensive process.

  • 2 weeks later...

So does v-spec still stand for "Victory Spec" in celebration of a JGTC championship win, as when the 32, 33 & 34gtrs won the championship, they bought out v-spec versions, just like when they bought out a nur spec...

the 35 hasn't won a championship as yet so, no v-spec 35 until it does...?

Porsche developed the DSG system for their race program in the 70's. Its old technology which was hounded by weight and size. VW/Audi honed that technology in the late 90's and made it production viable not long after the turn of the century. Nissan seem to be the first off the block to have a full running production version in a vehicle running decent torque through it. Interesting to see what transpires with its reliability once more power gets pushed through. Porsche have a dsg option on the 997 replacement.

LOL @ manual gearbox being boring to drive. Thats as naive as it gets, id suggest more time learning to drive on the limit before comments are made on a true driving experience. Electronic talent is the way of the future, but pure driver involvement is much more satisfying.

  • 4 weeks later...

The V-Spec is due in December.

Nissan execs have also confirmed that the GT-R is an unprofitable model but the introduction of vehicles based on the same platform will help change that. In addition to the Spec V, the platform is expected to yield a model for Infiniti due for release in less than a year.

More information that a PM platform sedan or SUV is in the making. I hope they do, since a raft of cheaper cars with parts interchangable with the GT-R (which is sure to enjoy a healthy aftermarket) can only be a good thing for Nissan enthusiasts.

I just hope no-one slaps a GT-R badge onto their sedan as a result.

by unprofitable model are they referring to the TOTAL cost of the car, ie... the countless hours and $$ in R+D. As opposed to the profitability relative to one GTR unit?

Is there a difference? R&D is a cost of producing the car. Even if you make a margin on pure manufacturing costs, the company's bottom line still suffers if you can't make the volumes in car's lifecycle.

So does v-spec still stand for "Victory Spec" in celebration of a JGTC championship win, as when the 32, 33 & 34gtrs won the championship, they bought out v-spec versions, just like when they bought out a nur spec...

the 35 hasn't won a championship as yet so, no v-spec 35 until it does...?

Its just marketing.....

Creating a reason why you should spend an extra $20K....

Its also creating its own after market products before the rest do.

  • 1 month later...

V-Spec details

Nissan’s new Nordeschliefe hopeful will be packing close to 390kWs, up around 35kWs, while torque jumps almost 15Nms peaking just shy of 600Nms. The fun doesn’t stop there either as the V-Spec will shed some 90kgs from its portly frame bringing kerb weight down under 1700kgs. The drop in weight is thanks largely to the use of lightweight body components, they’ve even gone as far as ditching the back seat and adding a roll cage. If earlier reports are accurate, we should expect to see new wheels and tyres with revised braking and suspension to round out the package.

Sweet.

The details many of these websites are publishing as fact are just month old rumours.

They're close to the real info stats wise but there's more to it that they are missing.

And it is most definitely not V-Spec. It is Spec-V I guess it's time to start getting used to it... :(

The details many of these websites are publishing as fact are just month old rumours.

They're close to the real info stats wise but there's more to it that they are missing.

And it is most definitely not V-Spec. It is Spec-V I guess it's time to start getting used to it... :)

Spec V ya say......hmmmmmm (strokes beard) Wonder what rocket scientist came up with that piece of originality. :(

Nissan said the car would be cheaper than a 911. That's probably what's holding the price the car is worth, to meet that "requirement".

Considering all the dealers are marking them up like a bitch already, and people are paying it, clearly the car could be sold for more.

I hope that they do build a PM platform sedan, to help recoup the costs....and build something to smash the Panamera.

Porsche developed the DSG system for their race program in the 70's. Its old technology which was hounded by weight and size.

The electronics were not fast enough back then to bring the DSG gearbox into a production ready product, there isn't anything super exotic about materials or production techniques to have made a DSG box in the 70's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...