Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol!

the f430 gearbox is on par with the gtr.

i personally think the F430 Scuderia gearbox is better than the gtr but i havn't driven a f430 or a gtr for that matter...

Actually, the F430 gearbox shifts slightly faster than the GTR's but loses out in terms of smoothness.

still waiting to read a reply from 2 pages ago about the plasma bores and if they will handle more then 600hp and if 100 000km rebuild is true?

If you are making serious power a 'freshen up' style rebuild occurs often. The more power the more frequent the rebuild. Race motors are rated in hours. A freshen up isn't much dosh compared to what you have blown on replacement brakes/tyres by the time it comes around. No big deal.

carbon|ceramic composite rotors- just awesome

98579429lx9.jpg

that'd be a first for a Jap manufacturer then

i am i the only person to notice the carbon ceramic brake rotors on that car?

maybe compare our respective post dates, perhaps?

off the top of my head... could be hideously wrong

GTR = .2 second shift

F430 Scuderia = 60 milliseconds (maybe even down to 20 milli in full race mode)

F430 Scuderia is 60 milliseconds (in race mode) as stated above.......the limiting factor is the synchros.

typical rx7 driver.

how will the carbon brakes work from cold on say, a targa stage, stuart?

btw isnt the gtr gear change time 0 sec when you change to the preselected gear? surely thats the whole point.

If the V-spec goes on sale before Nissan AU start selling standard R35's, that means we can still get them as private imports, yeah?

Ok, after reading the gearbox talk on this thread i have to say DSG, selespeed, F1 transmission or whatever you want to call it isnt always perfect. I have been a mechanic working on Ferrari's pretty much exclusively for the last 3 years so i have a tonne of experience dealing with the F1 box. Now for track days or blasting through the backroads the F1 box is simply awesome on the F430 (havent driven the scud yet but am sure it will be better still) but it can be temperamental and its reliability is starting the become an issue as the cars are now a few years old. (the 360 and 355 F1 boxes are rotten in this respect). Now i know the system on the GTR will be different but im sure similar problems will eventually arise such as dodgy pumps, actuators, release bearings, clutch position sensors etc..... All things that a normal manual box doesnt need. The F1 box in the F430 is an awesome bit of gear when its all working great but an F430 with a manual box is still are beautiful car to drive and i cant see how it would be any different in the GTR. About 40% of ferrari owners still opt for the H pattern so it is still relevant to ask is the GTR will have the option. Saying all that i think its probably best for the V-spec to be DSG only (360 challenge stradale and Scuderia are F1 only) and it would be a good idea for the standard GTR to have the H pattern as an option. Hey it will be better for alot of us in 10 years time when we get our hands on second hand ones not to have to worry about alot of the problems on an old DSG box can cause. Also there is probably 15K worth of gear needed for the DSG which could be knocked off the price on a H pattern car.

Also with my experience with Carbon ceramic brakes, yes very expensive but will last much much longer than a standard set. If you do alot of track days or hard spirited driving then the cost difference will eventualy mate up and the stopping power is unreal. I have done race prepping on an f430 challenge for 2 years now and we still havent had to change the discs on the car just the pads. And yeah, discs are around the 8k each mark.

I really couldnt tell you as i havent seen alot about the way the gtr box actually works. Id take an educated guess and say it would be very similar except for the clutch setup.

Very few similarities apart from the fact that you dont operate the clutch yourself and you change gears with paddles.. the Ferrari F1 box and the Nissan DSG are not easily comparable as there is not much similar to compare.

Yes competely different....

The Ferrari F1 gearbox, is a normal manual box with some clever software and actuators to operate the gear selection and clutch. The Alfa Selespeed gearbox is actually a development of the original Ferrari F1 system. The BMW SMG and Toyota SMT are very similar in this respect.

The GTR transmission has more in common with the VW DSG, Audi S Tronic and BMW M-DCT. With these systems the transmission contains two clutch packs. One looks after odd number gears, the other even number gears. As the car accelerates in first, the transmission has already selected second gear, and so at the change point, all it needs to do is to declutch first, and engage the clutch on second. Once this has been done, the transmission can pre select third gear and so on. This allows a shift to be made in 8 milliseconds. That compares with 150 milliseconds for the F1 transmission in an Enzo.

With the GTR using wet clutches, the life expectency should be higher than the F1 type clutches that get absolutely trashed during parking, and also by people driving them like an auto, holding the car stationary on hills using the transmission rather than the brakes.

Edited by nickcorr

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...