Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

fwaah, chek out the 32GTR in the bground...now that looks sweet!

:) you can't argue with motor sport pedigree! :rolleyes:

Whens the last time you say a 33gtst racing in Group A! Oh hang on, never saw a 32gtst run there either....

damn, that pintara is looking attractive now. CA20e's aren't they?

But the RB20 won the SATCC in 1990, and won several JTCC. That engine ended up in the R32, save the manifold and turbo. Neither the RB25 or R33 had done anyting except cruise Oxford Street with Pin Pearl paint, 20" chrmoies and yellow leather interior :blink:

Stop finding flaws in my nonsense rambling, it isnt meant to make sense :P

Dont S2 R33s have that tacky clith interior? They do look nicer then the S1 though. And the interior, just like the exterior is very much a matter of taste as the R33 is too Camry for me. Then again teh R32 is very VN Commodore :bunny:

I happen to have driven these 3... 1st car was 91 VN, 2nd 02 Camry & finally a 93 R33 ... what are the chances...

& to the OP, if you are coming from a Excel, then even a push bike is probably an upgrade from that... LOL :laugh: .

GL with your skyline.

to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? :)

IMG_1078.jpg

oh...its so ugly...

thats the best looking fridge i have ever seen! Who left it in the car park :laugh: nice looking washing machine in the back ground too.

Team white goods?

Wait! i have a better one: Just cos your car is too big to fit in a parking slot, doesn't mean you can take 3 :bunny:

have i mentioned this thread has out lived it's usefulness?

Edited by BHDave
to the thread starter.

noticing a trend here yet buddy? The vast majority of R32 owners base their entire argument on the look of the R32, which to them is superior...If 99% of their argument is based on something that comes down to personal taste, what does that say for the rest of the car they're defending ? ;)

speaking for myself and alot like my friends, we always prefered the shape of the R32 before we owned one.

tuff street style. but hey, that's us. we're all different.

everyone on here knows the RB25 is better stock to stock. newer technology, better response with bigger turbos, and can acheive a higher power rating.

everyone has their personal preference. i know if i wanted to go out and get higher in the power figures i would use an RB25.. even over an RB26. but i've got what i've got, and it surely does what i want it to do with ease.

we own RB engines, so we should be arguing with SR or CA owners, not ourselves.

my point was that the main argument from R32 owners is that 'R33's look shit' which is a stupid thing to say because its personal taste. if the worst thing they can say about an R33 is that it looks shit, then it must be a pretty good car. end of story.

"lets be frank: our 33V-Spec looks like a boat against the other three. It's the least aggressive in its styling and more closely cut from the generic Skyline cloth..."

- Motor Magazine, May 2008

article: r32 v r33 v r34 v r35 (gtrs)

lol...

MOTOR, the Holden specialists :thumbsup:

Thats a nice lookin gtst.. and it looks like a gtst but the color suits it perfectly.. :P

In my opinion, and i said it wayyy back in this thread.. i dont like R33's. i prefer the r32 LOOKS wise..

R33 is faster than the R32, is newer and blah blah blah.. R32 with rb25/26 is the best option i reckon because i love the look of the R32. but thats my personal opinion

As for my "blown" motor.. it never blew champ :) 1 of the turbos exploded

A couple pieces of the wheel managed to somehow go back into the engine and score the bores. no biggie :(

GTR front bar without the lip?? looks different lol but good

or other front bar.. whatever it is it looks nice, but we had a nice clean White R33 GTR @ work the other day... only had a set of wheels and it looked Gold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
    • But again, the engineers said your cast aluminium would be fine based on the load that would be stretching that section. Same load stretching the bolts in a flex (not the twist), with a much smaller cross sectional area than the original part you've broken. It's why you'd need to be using higher strength bolts, but that's just making up for the strength you lose with less area...
    • I am truly amazed someone on this planet was able to cycle the pump using a scan tool. I've always ghetto cycled them on Nissan 90s shit boxes by slamming the brakes and pulling the handbrake to agitate the rear wheels enough to cause a speed difference
×
×
  • Create New...