Jump to content
SAU Community

Haltech R35 Gt-r Dyno & Drag Results Thread


Recommended Posts

I was down at Gas Motorsport today for some closed door dyno testing.

Haltech have their R35 GTR running o their Platinum series ECU ( available later in the year)

Its a prototype set-up and they are still ironing some bugs out but so far doing well.

They replaced the centre muffler and cat with straight through pipe but it made no difference to power. Also tried removing the rear muffler. This also made no tangible difference.

But upping boost to 15psi and doping some fine tuning meant power went from 2987kW stock to 356kW at the wheels.

Not bad huh

Will be at Compak Attak tomorrow.

[mod edit: Edited thread title to include drag results]

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I was down at Gas Motorsport today for some closed door dyno testing.

Haltech have their R35 GTR running o their Platinum series ECU ( available later in the year)

Its a prototype set-up and they are still ironing some bugs out but so far doing well.

They replaced the centre muffler and cat with straight through pipe but it made no difference to power. Also tried removing the rear muffler. This also made no tangible difference.

But upping boost to 15psi and doping some fine tuning meant power went from 2987kW stock to 356kW at the wheels.

Not bad huh

Will be at Compak Attak tomorrow.

wow, looks like they de-tuned it pretty good :happy:

Yep 11.1 @ 124mph was the best run w/ launch control on. They dialed in 11.0 for the bracket drag but launch control sequence wasn't dialled in 100% correctly. Still ran an 11.5 @125 and an 11.8 @ 126 without launch control.

Pics, timeslip and story @ www.gtrblog.com

Full photo gallery coming soon

gains were never that big with past GTR's from just an exhaust... this car looks like it will run 10's with just a bit of boost and tune... amazing

yeah i guess big was a poor choice of word...noticible was more what i was thinking!

Terrific result.

Once we start seeing high 10s with basic mods like this, when tuning has been better developed, that will just be ridiculously fast.

How much cash will your old GTR's need to match that?

Terrific result.

Once we start seeing high 10s with basic mods like this, when tuning has been better developed, that will just be ridiculously fast.

How much cash will your old GTR's need to match that?

Not as much as it will cost to buy this car. :banana:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 馃槑 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
    • I do know where there is a fair few 馃槈
  • Create New...