Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm seriously considering purchasing a 4 door (sedan) 1996 GTS-t Skyline. Now obviously the sedan model isn't going to perform quite as well as the coupe, but is the performance hit anything significant?

I was planning on getting a coupe, but the sedan I'm looking at is a pretty damn good deal.

Thanks for any advice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/223207-2d-vs-4d-skyline-performance-drop/
Share on other sites

i test drove the 4dr 34 and 2dr 34...massive difference.

they were non turbos though.

what matt says about the extra two kegs is right tho..

Really? The extra doors/length must really add a significant amount of weight then, assuming the specs between the coupe/sedan are identical….

Anyone able to give more confirmation of this, or know if this is consistent in the R33 model?

IMO,

I have never driven a 4dr, though I have heard what they have handled like. I think what you might have to consider is the marketing purpose of a 4dr, what they would do to a 4dr. The only thing I can think of is the suspension being tuned differently to match the body's rigidity. Possibly with the 4dr since you have a big chunk of the side cut out for a door, the flexural rigidity would go down.

Thats my thoughts. Don't get me wrong I think 4dr skylines look hawt done right. Im still waiting to hear from someone to convert a 4dr r32 into a 4dr gtr, or buy a AUTECH r32 and put some turbz on that.

Performance difference could easily be attributed to incorrect timing on one car

fuel being used

condition of the motor

etc

for cars that are near enough to the same, you'd be hard pressed to pick it substantially

IMO,

I have never driven a 4dr, though I have heard what they have handled like. I think what you might have to consider is the marketing purpose of a 4dr, what they would do to a 4dr. The only thing I can think of is the suspension being tuned differently to match the body's rigidity. Possibly with the 4dr since you have a big chunk of the side cut out for a door, the flexural rigidity would go down.

Thats my thoughts. Don't get me wrong I think 4dr skylines look hawt done right. Im still waiting to hear from someone to convert a 4dr r32 into a 4dr gtr, or buy a AUTECH r32 and put some turbz on that.

What have you heared that they handle like then?

Havnt driven a 33 4door, but have driven a 33gtst, and on a seperate occasion r34 25GT (rwd non-turbo manuals) 2 and 4 doors back to back to specifically see if there is a differecne (wanted to know how they go as im planning on buying a 4door R34 GTFOUR in the near future).

Both the r34s perform almost identically.

If you percieved a difference it was most likley that the 2door that you drove was an r34 GTV which has the brakes and suspension from the GTT, even then the difference isnt that huge. There should be almost no difference in performance, there is only a 60kg weight difference.

As for the OPs question, there may be a difference, not 100% sure on the R33s, but the fundamental structure of the suspension is the same, but it may have a slightly softer set-up. Nothing a SydneyKid suspension kit would fix. And the engine and drivetrain are exactly the same.

check this out for the specs:

http://www.japanesesportcars.com/skyline/s...r33_gts25tm.php

The sedan is 8cm longer and 2cm taller and same ground clearance. Both sedan and coupe have identical wheelbase and track, and the sedan weighs 70kg more.

So to answer your question f**k all difference, go for a 4 door! thats my plan anyway.

Test driven both 2 dr and 4dr R33 and R34 , In the end i switched from a 2 dr R33 to a 4 dr R34

More space and bigger boot.....

unless u really want a 2 door skyline, not worth paying the extra $$ for it...

Moreover, 2 doors attract lots more attention ...unless thats what u want

I find that extra weight negligible for daily driving.....

anyway tats my 2 cents...

haha are you quoting my bad engarish?

on the handling side of things, what i hear is they have more sway about them and just dont come up to the "coupe" standard.

so since the four doors have more sway your saying the 2 doors handle better, the last time i looked new zealands drift champ was driving a 4 door. :)

post-50030-1213354082_thumb.jpg

dont confuse the comparison with a gtr, the only diff is the fact ones a coupe and ones a four door.

i have found that 9 times out of ten i can full lock drift, with out feeling the rear of the car wanting to overtake the front,

the gtr was very uneasy, as i hate HICAS, but now handles just aswell since ive had it removed

Edited by nizmonut
haha are you quoting my bad engarish?

on the handling side of things, what i hear is they have more sway about them and just dont come up to the "coupe" standard.

I hope the 4 door isnt worse... considering how much strengthening the 2 door needs. Mine felt like a dead fish less than stock, ie less the strut braces (as most cars are sold). With them and some other bracing the car tightened up.. but that isn't stock.

I like how my 4dr handles, but it is awd, and for some reason has had additional under body bracing, which from memory runs from under the front doors to the rear suspension, weirdest thing I've ever seen. I'd suppose it would reduce flex though.

I have owned a r33 gts25t sedan and now a coupe.

the sedan is something like 50 kg's heavier.

You cant notice a difference between the two mod for mod.. and if u can u may just well have ur hand on it :geek:.. I am speaking for r33 gts25t's only..

If its an r33 ur after, dont for one second think the sedan wont perform..... all performance part are interchanable ie suspension, all motor, zorst etc..

so since the four doors have more sway your saying the 2 doors handle better, the last time i looked new zealands drift champ was driving a 4 door. :ermm:

post-50030-1213354082_thumb.jpg

dont confuse the comparison with a gtr, the only diff is the fact ones a coupe and ones a four door.

i have found that 9 times out of ten i can full lock drift, with out feeling the rear of the car wanting to overtake the front,

the gtr was very uneasy, as i hate HICAS, but now handles just aswell since ive had it removed

But isnt being New Zealand champ the same as being the smartest kid with Down syndrome. :)

on the subject of differences, does anyone know for certain that the back lights of a r34 coupe can fit sedan? i mean the whole assembly...

cheers guys

No they won't fit. Completely different.

Edited by n15m0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...