Jump to content
SAU Community

Which Stroker Kit  

177 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Tomei hasnt released that much info on rating but i have reading up on it alot and seem find its rating is about 600ps (441kW) to 800ps ( 588.40KW)

anyone making over 400kw in there GTR will be more than happy to keep it at that level. so theres no point getin the HKS step 2 or 3 for that extra pwoer level

you say you payed $7500 for the HKS kit which is not bad. but i would of gone the Tomei kit for that same price

The 7k TOMEI 2.8 stroker kit is cheaper as it does not have a full 12 counter weight crankshaft it only has a 8 counterweight crank so for circuit use i would prefer the HKS step 2 2.8 or the jun 2.7 as both have the full 12 counterweight crank.

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

u guys are missing the point the guys wants to know which is the best stroker kit out there.

i think the Tomei is still better than the HKS. as the tomei item has a Bore 87.5mm with brings the cc to 2807 $ 7,649 which is cheaper than the HKS step 3

which the HKS stroker kit Step 1 Bore 86.0mm, Step 2 Bore 86.5mm, Step 3 Bore 87.0mm $10,000

the steps of the stroker kits have nothing to do with bore size. you have the option of 86.5 and 87mm with most of them.. some have 87.5 and 88mm which i wouldnt think about doin if your pushing a motor anywhere near its limits while hoping for reliability

they have everything to do with bore size. "Cubic centimeters. It's a measure of displacement. Displacement is "bore x stoke" or the cross-sectional area of the cylinder times the distance the piston travels in the cylinder. The larger the bore and the stroke, the greater the displacement"

end of the day people are pay alot of my for a stroker kit and they want the most out of it. yes reliability is one of them but having more cc with a bigger bore size always win's.

they have everything to do with bore size. "Cubic centimeters. It's a measure of displacement. Displacement is "bore x stoke" or the cross-sectional area of the cylinder times the distance the piston travels in the cylinder. The larger the bore and the stroke, the greater the displacement"

end of the day people are pay alot of my for a stroker kit and they want the most out of it. yes reliability is one of them but having more cc with a bigger bore size always win's.

the step 1 2 and 3's mean more than just bore size. heres the hks kits brief run down

Step 1, pistons rods and crank

Step 2, pistons with coatings rods and crank

Step 3, pistons with coatings and billet rods and crank

the tomei step 1 and step 2 are slightly different with the step 2 having the cooling channel pistons

Are cooling channel pistons REALLY needed?

I have the Tomei stroker with NON cooling channel pistons and have had no problems what so ever.... Thats with a "tight" 2 thou piston to bore clearence.

they have everything to do with bore size. "Cubic centimeters. It's a measure of displacement. Displacement is "bore x stoke" or the cross-sectional area of the cylinder times the distance the piston travels in the cylinder. The larger the bore and the stroke, the greater the displacement"

end of the day people are pay alot of my for a stroker kit and they want the most out of it. yes reliability is one of them but having more cc with a bigger bore size always win's.

if the 3.4L stroker was available i wouldn't mind giving it a go. due to the displacement you wouldn't have to rev the engine to get a lot of torque and power but if you balance the thing well it should have no issues doing 8000rpm there are many RB30 engines doing 8000-8500 rpm how much more do you need?

^they certainly arent cheap by any means.

Out of interest how much does it cost to to fully prepare a stock crank for your average tough drag/track engine?

Martin HKS, whilst your here, can you comment on the power handling of the HKS step1/2? ive read that they seemingly use very similar components in the kits, and that even a step one kit should be good for far more than its 600ps rating. This would be good to know as there is a significant price diference.

Here is the HKS breakdown on kits. We all know you can run them a lot harder than HKS recommend just like stock.

They are all 2771cc displacement using 77.7mm full counter stroke crankshaft and 87.0mm bore. Step 1 and 2 have 21mm pin while the discontinued Step 3 used 22.0mm.

HKS Step 1 = Forged Crank, Piston, and Forged Conrods

HKS Step 2 = Lightened Forged Crank, Nickel Coated Pistons with Titanium Coated Rings and Forged Conrods

HKS Step 3 = Billet Crank, Nickel Coated Pistons with Titanium Coated Rings and Forged Conrods in 22mm

Cheers

Marty

Edited by Martin HKS

From the sounds of things, I'm starting to look into the JUN 2.7 kit, HKS and Tomei 2.8(its kinda hard for me to get rb30 parts here in America hehe). From What I have seen the guys from CRD like to run that kit. I so want something that "revs like a sewing machine" LoL. The only issue now is my turbo size(I'm starting to realize that its always something else that needs to be figured out after you answer one questions). I want to go top mount twins that are externally gated, but im not sure what size turbo I should get. I've seen a lot of cars (via youtube, streetfire, magazines, etc.) running these big twins on top like in this video,

, but I can never find what size they are.

Its kinda funny with this forum though becuase I wait up all night for a response browsing this forum, but I always seem to forget you guys over there are on a completely different time zone that I am :( LoL!

But in all seriousness, this is the best, most helpful, nonbashing forum I've ever been on. And I really do appreciate all the help you guys have given me thus far and know I can always count on the right answer from you guys. :)

Being a broke ass Skyline owner, i have to question is the extra little bit of response and the extra few kws really worth the expense? I mean, have a holiday at Lake Como and have a 370rwkws rebuild, or sit at home and hope you can feel the difference between "fark me dead" quick and "i cant feel the difference" quick but the clock says i am going quicker?

Being a broke ass Skyline owner, i have to question is the extra little bit of response and the extra few kws really worth the expense? I mean, have a holiday at Lake Como and have a 370rwkws rebuild, or sit at home and hope you can feel the difference between "fark me dead" quick and "i cant feel the difference" quick but the clock says i am going quicker?

This is why I said go RB30, you can blatently tell the difference. One of the ones RIPS in NZ built for a customer makes near 500kw @ wheels on pump gas, and has more power EVERYWHERE than what it did on the stock R34 turbos. If he replicated the exact same turbo/cam/power level on the RB26 then it'd be a different situation altogether.

The cool thing about extra displacement is that it has more torque all by itself, if you add boost it just piles it on - if the RB30 had the same boost curve as an RB26 it'd make more power all the way through the rev range. The thing is, the RB30 spools the turbo(s) harder as well so it will make even more power everywhere in the rev range - so you may as well counter that and get an even bigger turbo which is the same if not a little laggier than the ones on the RB26, make more power/response all the way through the rev range, and make a metric crap load more up top with no compromise.

This is why I said go RB30, you can blatently tell the difference. One of the ones RIPS in NZ built for a customer makes near 500kw @ wheels on pump gas, and has more power EVERYWHERE than what it did on the stock R34 turbos. If he replicated the exact same turbo/cam/power level on the RB26 then it'd be a different situation altogether.

The cool thing about extra displacement is that it has more torque all by itself, if you add boost it just piles it on - if the RB30 had the same boost curve as an RB26 it'd make more power all the way through the rev range. The thing is, the RB30 spools the turbo(s) harder as well so it will make even more power everywhere in the rev range - so you may as well counter that and get an even bigger turbo which is the same if not a little laggier than the ones on the RB26, make more power/response all the way through the rev range, and make a metric crap load more up top with no compromise.

As I have perviously states in one of my pervious statements, It is dam near impossible for me to get my hands on an RB30 bottom end LoL. And I'm sure as hell not paying our my arse hole for the OS Giken Kit no matter how many people say how good it is LoL.

But the RB30 would be my choice if I wanted to do with a BIG signle LoL.

I'm just so undecided on what I would like this build to result in .... I've just got so many thoughts going through my head with all these possibilities LoL :3some:

9's can be done quite easy with a well built engine using mostly stock components...Take our old set-up as an example.

STD 05U block

86mm Aries pistons

STD rods

STD crank

Mildly ported head

STD valves

STD springs

STD retainers

Tomei 1.2mm head gasket

Tomei oil restrictor

Tomei cams 260 9.15mm

Tomei sump baffle

N1 oil pump

N1 water pump

This ran low 10's with full weight 1600kg+ including driver using HKS 2530 low mounts and running Federal street rubber.

Car was ran flat out for 3 years before the rear turbo failed due to oil starvation (blocked oil feed) and when the engine was pulled down it was in perfect order.

The addition of one or more of the following would have seen high 9's

Bigger turbo's

Better rubber

Lighter car

Dog gearbox

NOS kit

Better driver

Edited by DiRTgarage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
×
×
  • Create New...