Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh yeah my bad, was reading the garrett catalogue wrong.

Anyway just noticed there really isn't much difference between -7 and -9 turbo specs. Although -9s are rated at higher horsepower.

Has anyone had experience with both turbos and could feel a difference on street or performance.

Hi there look honestly stop procrastinating so much I have the -9s look these are what you want not the -7s as they run out of puff in mid to top end. The tiny little bit of slight lag you get with a -9 you more than catch up a second later when your pulling hard in mid and top leaving the guy with the -7 looking at your beautiful round stop light lenses. -9 future proof you if and especially you will want more power and the responce is still crisp, I have hosed guys with the larger -5 waiting for those to come on strong and I've already pulled way to far ahead to catch. Int opinion the -9 are the ultimate street and strip twin turbo setup for most of us non pro guys. I managed 363rwkw with these on 18psi and all by 3600rpm why would you bother with the -7s only guys who own WRXs worry about a little lag oh my god a little lag.

Cheers,

David.

Well here's my dyno graph to show my 362rwkw with my -7 which was achieved at 22psi. Of course there are a lot of variable factors (including the extra torque I'm making from my 2.8 stroker).

I think these turbos have been great. I'll be taking mine out shortly and replacing them with a set of HKS GT-RS's because the quest for greater power has got hold of me :)

362.jpg

Admittedly that is pushing them to their very limits and I have a lot of supporting modifications but I just wanted to post my figures to show it's not a totally black and white arguement and how it's dependant on a lot of factors.

Haha how much power do you need Kat?!

Same workshop as Kat I think:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4445699

That and her graph would have to be max 'mass flow' of those turbochargers rated at 300hp each!!

My -5s on a stock R32 engine looks just about exactly like this graph at 17psi:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4563172

It's making 160awkw @ 3500rpm (which is plenty I reckon), 200awkw at ~4300rpm, 95% of full power at 5000rpm and maxing at ~7000rpm. So, just on 300awkw from 5-7k RPM, making 293 at all 4 on 17psi and 306 at all 4 on 18.5psi.

I like the -5s as they don't compromise much for when I get an engine built. I had 2530s on the car before anyway so am used to lower response times... Hell, I had a 700hp T66 - 1.32 rear on a car 6 years ago, LOL.

Indeed...

360rwkw out of -7's? They are barely bigger than factory... Must be on E85?

I think the -7 is a typo because earlier the same person says he has -9's. I've got a mate making 464rwkw with -5's on 50% e85/50% BP Ultimate so 360 on -9's would be acheivable.

I think the -7 is a typo because earlier the same person says he has -9's. I've got a mate making 464rwkw with -5's on 50% e85/50% BP Ultimate so 360 on -9's would be acheivable.

Go back and read again. At no point does SHE say she has -9's. I made 360rwkw on -7's and have progressive dyno sheets to prove it.

go the -9's they are simply better in everyway

only reason i went for the -7's is because i couldn't wait and needed my car, the guy at the shop said there was like a month wait for the -9's til they come

whilst the -7, i could get overnight

Go back and read again. At no point does SHE say she has -9's. I made 360rwkw on -7's and have progressive dyno sheets to prove it.

Question is do you have a MPH to actually back it up?

Another run @ Dyno Day's with similar setup cars?

When someone mysteriously achieves 40rwkw+ than anyone else has before, it's going to be questioned. Fair enough as well.

I could get you a dyno sheet showing 600rwkw from -7's. Doesn't mean it correct now does it?

The point being a dyno sheet at times, proves nothing. There are no shootout mode markings or any other input settings, so goodness knows how that dyno was setup.

If it was -9s, ye i could believe as well. But not -7's.

I would love to have someone to compare this with! Another GTR at dyno days would be nice let alone another GTR with a 2.8L stroker, bigger cams, other similar mods and -7 turbos!

I've never seen anyone with this setup, -7's would not have been my choice after the stroker. Now I have more money free and am chasing bigger power I'm upgrading to something more suitable.

TBH I don't care if you believe it or not. I have had the car since stock, it's always been tested on the same dyno and at each stage of it's mods it's had roughly what I would have expected.

I only put this up to share my results, not for an arguement from someone who's never even laid eyes on my car!

My car has been on the same dyno as Kat's and so have lots of other peoples that I know. We have almost all been on other dynos as well, so I think we'd know if there was something dodgey about Ed's figures.

At least three of us actually think his dyno reads a little low if anything......

I'll be taking mine out shortly and replacing them with a set of HKS GT-RS's because the quest for greater power has got hold of me :)

hi katrina,

that is a nice setup u have there ;) what cams u running & any head work/porting?

reason i ask, im making 405awkw on my -10's (hks gtrs equivalent) @ 23psi on my rb26/30, seeing that you are from the ACT u might know of 'autotech' & 'pro engines'

where do u take your car for mechanical mods & tuning?

regards

marko

Thanks John! :)

I'm running HKS 246 in and 272 out step 2 cams from memory and the head is ported.

Autotech do all my tuning and servicing and Greg from Pro Engines did the engine build and head work.

I'm looking forward to seeing the results of the GT-RS's and I'd be expecting a minimum of 400awkw. I've spoken to Jim from Croydon and owners of some other big name Skylines who have given me a good idea of what to expect.

Go back and read again. At no point does SHE say she has -9's. I made 360rwkw on -7's and have progressive dyno sheets to prove it.

:) Sorry I assumed gender ;)

No offense but either the dyno is way out of whack or the ambient air temp sensor has been put somewhere hot in the engine bay to make the figure look higher.

hi katrina,

that is a nice setup u have there :) what cams u running & any head work/porting?

reason i ask, im making 405awkw on my -10's (hks gtrs equivalent) @ 23psi on my rb26/30, seeing that you are from the ACT u might know of 'autotech' & 'pro engines'

where do u take your car for mechanical mods & tuning?

regards

marko

What fuel are U running? My mate is making 464rwkw on -5's and 50% E85 / 50% BP98 at that same boost level. That's with Tomei 260 cams and a Jun 2.7L kit.

Haha never assume. Just curious that you may have ever met a dude called Kat :)

Just BP ultimate. It was also runing a 3.5" exhaust with a straight through (no cat but due to emissions/not wanting to get defected there's one on there now), 800cc injectors. I have the Tomei 2.8L kit, Tomei oil pump, Bosch 044...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...