Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i rang united head office and buleen has it too... 208 buleen rd :ermm:

they dont know when the real roll out will be... just that it wont be every united....

so c'mon fellas.... lets all jump on it!!! the more people that run it the more places it'll be!

55 litres @ 1.40 = $77 - ballpark 391kms to a tank @ 14 litres per 100

55 litres @ 0.99 = $54 - ballpark 305kms to a tank @ 18 litres per 100

with the $23 you save you can buy another

22 litres at the same cost of 98 penis (at $1.40 per llitre)

which will give you a further 125kms

so total

$77 and 391kms

$77 and 425kms

This assumes 98 penis of $1.40 and $0.99 of e85

agreed.... but if it happens to be cheaper than 98 then so be it...

what i'm really waiting for is 98 to cost $3/litre and e85 like $1.50 lol

303 rwkw :ermm:

(the 311 didn't hit the limiter like the 303 one did, was probably 500 revs short)

turbo is still making good power @ redline and would have a little bit more to give if i bothered to fix the boost i'd say

was all hogwash basically Dezz

pros- more torque everywhere, more power, less combustion heat, less carbon buildup

cons- your car will drink fuel like a sailor on shore leave, which more than compensates for the price difference to 98

well done mate. :ermm:

You increased boost so you cant compare figures. how much power did you make on the same boost?

basically the comparison is from the point where both fuel's started to dye off...

both had more in them with more boost, but i'm playin it safe on the tunes :)

was all hogwash basically Dezz

pros- more torque everywhere, more power, less combustion heat, less carbon buildup

cons- your car will drink fuel like a sailor on shore leave, which more than compensates for the price difference to 98

Excellent, might speak to my tuner.

Although latest tune was 253rwkw, boost dropping off by a few psi in the top end, so I wouldn't be expecting too much more from a GT-RS anyway...

i would... i'd be guessing 280rwkw dezz...

the timing advance you can get away with from e85 gives sooo much

what boost control are you running? what psi?

i would... i'd be guessing 280rwkw dezz...

the timing advance you can get away with from e85 gives sooo much

what boost control are you running? what psi?

You sure?

I've never heard of anyone making 280rwkw with a GT-RS on a 25...I thought it was past its capability, but hey, I'd love to be wrong :ermm:

Blitz SBC Spec-R, 18psi but tailing off to about 16 (trying to find the problem)

you ever heard of a 2835 .68 making 311? :ermm:

yeah once...some guy, joey joe joe something or other

actuator maybe?

i'm running a spec s

Yeah that's what we're thinking, although you'd think HKS would make their actuator to hold the amount of boost the turbo is made for...

Spoken to another guy running a GT-RS and he said his is fine, suggested playing with the gain settings on the EBC, so I'll take that to the tuner as well...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Agree with Rob. I recently did mine and replacing with a brand new unit made the most sense compared with rebuilding my existing gearbox.
    • Are you suggesting that the kit did a cheap and nasty job of just jamming the wheel in between other things and caused the misalignment? I mean, we normally do this with an integrated crank trigger wheel, not something bodged on. It's not 1995 any more.
    • I mean, given the number of BMWs you own their tolerance for improper torque is rather low. The number of torque + angle spec bolts and non-reusable bolts in one is nuts.
    • Atmospheric vent requires something that doesn't use a MAF for load. You would need a standalone ECU for that.
    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...