Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

15w50 isn't thick for an RB motor. the block design is from the late 80's and the unopened ones are all up around 150,000 - 200,000 now

for everyday pulp i'm usuing castrol edge 10w60 these days as i drive only 5 mins to work and the engine never even gets hot, but if the car ever becomes track only i'm just gonna go motul 300v lemans 20w60.

15w50 in a motul 300v or 6100 is a great compromise for engines that see lots of high revs

the oil pumps in RB's are very high pressure and the temps on track can really soar.

Especially if its an RB26.

When i was at Advan we used nothing but 300V 20W60 in GTR's and after pulling several down for freshen ups i can say the oilis awesome. Because of this i will use nothing but the 300V in my own car.

You certainly pay a premium for 300V but if it means the engine lives longer who is going to complain

Edited by ido09s

Without trying to turn this into an oil thread, Ive been under the impression from this forum that a 40w oil was plenty for most RB engines..

Now I believe thicker oils are better for older engines and engines that see a lot of hardwork, I even debated so in another thread to alot of people that swear a 40w was more than adequate for any RB.

Even you have said many times Hamish that you always used motul 4100 or has that bearing failure cause a change of heart.. :P

personally I just use the 8100 xces but I have considered the 6100, but what is the advantage of it and why is it recomended for Ethanol.

For most intents and purposes, the 10w40 will be perfect for your average RB...but everyone's situation is different - to some, the 15w50 is a better fit. You should try different oil brands and viscosities until you settle on something that works for your own application. You aren't going to kill your engine in the 5000km that you spend testing an oil.

Without trying to turn this into an oil thread, Ive been under the impression from this forum that a 40w oil was plenty for most RB engines..

Now I believe thicker oils are better for older engines and engines that see a lot of hardwork, I even debated so in another thread to alot of people that swear a 40w was more than adequate for any RB.

Even you have said many times Hamish that you always used motul 4100 or has that bearing failure cause a change of heart.. :P

personally I just use the 8100 xces but I have considered the 6100, but what is the advantage of it and why is it recomended for Ethanol.

I had always used turbolight, and I was happy with it. As a daily driver, the car absolutely loved it! I still sell it every day to people with jap motors that are just for daily drivers, but you are correct, that bearing failure has made me re-think. I lean on my motors pretty hard and I feel the extra protection of the heavier weight is worth it.

the motul 6100 synergie 15w50 is recommended for gas and diesel motors. It has a slight mineral content that allows it to absorb small ammounts of water, which makes it perfect for e85 applications.

the 8100 series is aimed at newer cars than ones running RB motors and due to it's thinner nature I would recommend going a slightly different route. what weight are you using?

.

the motul 6100 synergie 15w50 is recommended for gas and diesel motors. It has a slight mineral content that allows it to absorb small amounts of water, which makes it perfect for e85 applications.

Ok now i gets it. :thumbsup:

I think Im using 5-40 (may be 10-40), car was always run on Mobil 1 but motul was on sale when i went to buy it.

I was under the impression light viscosity were recomended to lubricate turbos on startup, but I always let my car warm up a so little heavier wouldnt hurt.

Still haven't got my E85 tune :(

I think the pertinent thing is what the running oil temperatures are and obviously in a track situation it will be higher in an engine without improved water and oil cooling systems . I know of people who club raced RBs and used 10W60 oils all the time , they freely admitted that they could have had better road fuel consumption and a bit more power on the street because of lower viscocity oils reduced oil sheer drag .

Personally I think the best of both worlds is to use a thermostactically controlled oil cooler system and slightly lower viscosity oils . The oil thermostat is there to make sure the oil cooler does zip until it reaches a certain point ie 90-100 deg C . The say 10W40 oil lubricates with less drag and the oil cooler keeps it from overheating when worked hard .

Just as a heads up GL Lubricants in Sydney is bringing in some of the various Mobil 1 oils not normally sold in Australia and the ones that interest me are the synthetic 4T Racing bike oils . I've used this in 15W50 and while I've had no issues with it I'll change to the 10W40 viscosity when it becomes available soon .

These 4T Racing synthetics are not dedicated race oils but they are very high in ZDDP or Zinc and Phos which are anti wear additives fast disapearing in many current "Green Era" oils because they poison Cats over time .

From memory the pricing will be around 12-13 a quart and available also in 6 quart cartons .

Food for thought , cheers A .

  • 2 weeks later...

I know of people who club raced RBs and used 10W60 oils all the time , they freely admitted that they could have had better road fuel consumption and a bit more power on the street because of lower viscocity oils reduced oil sheer drag .

so ant, what are your thought's on using say 300v 15w50 or 20w60 with it's advertised zero sheer factor?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...