Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

keep it at two :P

i got mine from otomoto in sydney, im very sure that same person/factory make these units.

i will soon have dyno results with this dump pipe and with a custom 3inch unit, just need to get around to it.

-alex

im at 250rwkw with same dump and no drama's so far.

Nice work Davo Thats the best engine bay I've seen so far. Want to try a .63 rear with above Dump for $250? You probably see another 35KWs with .63 rear.

Thanks for the offer Stao but I'm going to try and find an OP6 or get an AVO rear(.63?) as I have a really nice 1 peice 3.5" custom split dump and I want to keep it on the car if i can.

Do you know if I wiil have to send the AVO rear to you for machining to match the G2 profile?

Thanks for the offer Stao but I'm going to try and find an OP6 or get an AVO rear(.63?) as I have a really nice 1 peice 3.5" custom split dump and I want to keep it on the car if i can.

Do you know if I wiil have to send the AVO rear to you for machining to match the G2 profile?

Yes we can machine it to suit the Turbine if you can send in a housing. it will cost $150 to profile.

Hey Stao.

Could you give me a price for a highflow service that i can reach up to or near 270rwkw? looks like it could be the .63 housing with a G3 profile?

car is r33 GTST

Thanks mate

Hey Stao.

Could you give me a price for a highflow service that i can reach up to or near 270rwkw? looks like it could be the .63 housing with a G3 profile?

car is r33 GTST

Thanks mate

For the R33 its recommended to go for our ATR28G3 in T3 .63 rear internally gated. We can get you a cheap dump pipe to bolt on stock front pipe for $100. The cost for this turbo with oil feeding line and 14psi internal wastegate setup is $1080.

im at 250rwkw with same dump and no drama's so far.

yeah i got 255rwkw with a kkr480 on 15psi, but you can clearly see on the dyno run that it drops boost and the torque curve just plummets down. thats with a external wastegate too.

i should have my new dyno print out soon to compare.

-alex

But any way, Most of people who are likely to use those dump pipes are with stock front pipes. which is not really going to affect much. But any way if you run it into a 3inch front pipe it should be ok.

The boost drop thing can be due to some thing else. Do you have a print of your current boost curve?

Ok This would be the very first dyno sheet from ATR43 in .63 rear internally gated. Its a R33 RB25det with :

Power FC

550cc Nismo injectors

Z32 AFM

FMIC

3inch exhaust with Cat

Pod filter

Metal intake pipe.

Car made 226rwkws on 9psi, Tuner left it at 11.30PM last night. Its coming back to finish off the tune in few days, hopefully seeing 280rwkws with a bit more live on the curve.

Customer came in and took me for a drive this afternoon. It felt great. There is no lagness like the TR43is, super smooth acceleration with plenty of power and torque. This is probably one of the best turbos to suit a RB25det.

For now:

atr28g3rb25232rwkw.JPG

yeah i got 255rwkw with a kkr480 on 15psi, but you can clearly see on the dyno run that it drops boost and the torque curve just plummets down. thats with a external wastegate too.

i should have my new dyno print out soon to compare.

-alex

drops boost? you must have something setup wrong.. mine holds 1.4 bar strong to redline. if i wind it up to 1.5bar it has held that fine aswell 2.

so something must have been wrong in your setup.

Hey Stao can I ask a quick question?

A good friend of mine is building an RB30 at the moment (To put into a 242 Volvo of all things :P ) which is out of a 1988 VL Commodore turbo. He has told me that I can have the turbo from it as he is planning on using a GT35.

I am thinking of sending the exhaust housing down to you for machining to match up with my ATR28 G2 profile.

This is the .63 housing same as OP6 isnt it?

Can I expect much lag with this setup?

What figures should I expect to reach?

Hi Dave, The VG30's turbine housing is .63 so its a bigger housing then a OP6. Which is excellent to use. I think with the .63 rear you can get over 260rwkws. It will be noticeable laggier but definitely worth it.

Geraus. :P That R33 Tuned at Nicks (He's famous on flash tuning V8 and XR6 turbos) was lot more torquer compare to yours. hard to say, and only running 9psi. Tune's not yet finished. I'm pretty sure that car can hit about 270rwkws. If you want I can upgrade your turbine housing with a discount price to see what it does at 18psi.

hi stao just wondering if you provide an installation sheet with the turbos.... for example not sure but is there any washers/ fittings that will need to be purchased or replaced with the trubos for optimum operation

With high flows its just matter of bolt every thing back the way you unbolt every thing off (Stock washers should be ok, But prefer new washers). We don't have fittings instructions prepared at this stage. Most performance workshops would know how to slap every thing together in the right way.

Thanks Stao,

How much lag are we talking? Just a couple of hundred rpm or 1000+

260 kw will be great but not if boost doesn't come on till 4000-5000 rpm

In your opinion with my mods what do you think?

probably around 500~800RPMs of more lag. But heaps more torque, and since turbine housing is bigger its be able to hold high boost. Its only $150 to profile this housing, and if you don't like it you can always put your stock housing back in.

Thanks Stao,

I can put this housing onto the turbo myself? I don't need to rebalance or anything like that?

:thumbsup: you don't need to balance a turbine housing. There are 6 bolts on the buttom and a circlip which you need to remove, then the turbine housing will come off. Put the CHRA in to the new housing, tighten all the bolts, and connect the actuator rod. Or If you like send the turbo in with the new housing, and we can change it here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...