Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

That is the CHRA that we normally use for GTR turbocharger high flowing. We will need your factory housings to carry it out. Or we can supply you 2x complete Garrett turbos. I will PM you a quote tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so we can run the turbos with no blow of vavle?? by blocking up our stock one?

When i got my car it had been defected for an atmo bov so the previous owner had just blocked off the hole where the bov was, still seemed fine to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is the commercial version of ATR43. This is now available. The turbo comes in 4x different profiles:

atr43front.jpg

atr43rear.jpg

ATR43G1: 450HP in . 58 / .63 rear

ATR43G2: 480HP in . 58 / .63 rear

ATR43G3: 520HP in .63 Rear

ATR43G4: 600HP in .84 rear

It is designed to bolton to your stock manifold, dump, water, and oil drain. Braided oil feeding line is required and priced at $80 with turbo. All turbos can be built with a Garrett GT Ball bearing CHRA depends on consumer's budget. To fit them to factory intake and intercooler pipes you will also need 2x silicon pipes one in 90 degrees 2inch and the other in 3inch straight.

ATR43's .58 and .63 Turbine housing is interchangeable with All ATR28Gx High flows that we've sold. Will gain instant power increasement specially to the ATR28G2 based R32 / R33 xIU high flows, Should have No issues archive upto 270rwkws with supporting moods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sleeve bearing turbo require greater amount of oil flow. The bearings needs oil pressure to float. BB does not. BB turbos has roughly 10% better in response. Sleeve bearing turbos are cheaper to build and service.

ATR43Gx are made to be interchangeable with Garrett GT3071, GT3076, and GT3582 GT CHRAs.

So really comes down on the consumer's budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATR43G1: 450HP in . 58 / .63 rear

ATR43G2: 480HP in . 58 / .63 rear

ATR43G3: 520HP in .63 Rear

ATR43G4: 600HP in .84 rear

Are these figures rear wheel or fly wheel?

What is the price for the G3 and G4 in both sleeve and bb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those are fly figures, which i think is the standard way manu's spec their turbo's

I assumed that, just wanna be 100% sure.

Edited by W0rp3D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the price to rebuild a set of GTR turbos in both bearing forms?

To high flow GTR turbo using GT2860RS BB CHRA is $1350 each. And we can supply the Garrett unit brand new for $1400 so might not really be worth doing. To high flow with Sleeve bearing CHRA in identical spec is $800 each turbo.

chra.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is the commercial version of ATR43. This is now available. The turbo comes in 4x different profiles:

atr43front.jpg

atr43rear.jpg

ATR43G1: 450HP in . 58 / .63 rear

ATR43G2: 480HP in . 58 / .63 rear

ATR43G3: 520HP in .63 Rear

ATR43G4: 600HP in .84 rear

It is designed to bolton to your stock manifold, dump, water, and oil drain. Braided oil feeding line is required and priced at $80 with turbo. All turbos can be built with a Garrett GT Ball bearing CHRA depends on consumer's budget. To fit them to factory intake and intercooler pipes you will also need 2x silicon pipes one in 90 degrees 2inch and the other in 3inch straight.

ATR43's .58 and .63 Turbine housing is interchangeable with All ATR28Gx High flows that we've sold. Will gain instant power increasement specially to the ATR28G2 based R32 / R33 xIU high flows, Should have No issues archive upto 270rwkws with supporting moods.

How much are the ATR43G3: 520HP in .63 Rear and the ATR43G4: 600HP in .84 rear for the rb25det, when should you be able to see full boost? and what is required for a direct bolt on to the rb25det?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

um be careful quoting prices here, this isn't trader / for sale?

He is a business trader and this thread was set up by him to tell everyone about his products, i dont see a dilemma with putting up prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats all cool. If I'm bending any rules I will fix it up. From experience BB turbos are more likely to get cooked. Most sleeve bearing turbos receives greater amount of oil flow and this is built built water cooled. So they are pretty fine.

The current Ball bearing turbos runs oil feeding pins on the top with 20thou wholes on both side, Not sure why Garrett designed it that way. But in lot of cases they gets filled from dirt in engine oil which allow bearings to cook. Then they becomes very expansive to overhaul. about 80% of Ball bearing overhaul jobs we currently getting has failed in that manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...