Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If it truly has full boost at 3k I really doubt it'll make over 250kw

garret who have far more engineering experience can't even make a turbo that does that, sorry to be negative but I just can't see it being true.

If it truly has full boost at 3k I really doubt it'll make over 250kw

garret who have far more engineering experience can't even make a turbo that does that, sorry to be negative but I just can't see it being true.

See turbochargers engineered in this project are solely for RB25det engines, Garrett would make a turbo to suit a variety of engines. There are room for improvement when designs becomes specialized.

At moment it feels like some where around the 280rwkws mark with very steady torque. Its drives very differently to any other turbos I've engineered or experienced so far. I'm expecting an out standing result.

If this turbo makes 280kw with full boost at 3k I will buy one in the near future, providing it holds the power to at least 6k on less than or equal to 20psi.

This will be a garret killer if it makes those results!

my current highflow makes full boost at ~3k but only makes 240kw on 18psi, so if I can get 40kw over that with the same response, holy shit!

What are the main engineering differences with this turbo over previous designs ?

Edited by Rolls

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

Dyno sheet please

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

NA + turbo does not count.

Nope - nothing special, no E85.

tuner said not much difference between what he has seen with normal turbo motor and the slightly higher compression NA with my turbo.

post-36975-0-79536600-1311255089_thumb.jpg this was with an electronic boost controller

post-36975-0-72596700-1311255208_thumb.jpg this was with a bleed valve

Decent power for the street, very useable... as soon as I touch the accelerator I get boost..

What turbo?

edit: just saw your post, how on earth do you get a GT3076 on boost by 3k? Most people are seeing 3.5 to 4k ? Was that with some ridiculous ramp rate?

Edited by Rolls

What turbo?

edit: just saw your post, how on earth do you get a GT3076 on boost by 3k? Most people are seeing 3.5 to 4k ? Was that with some ridiculous ramp rate?

The two runs are not equal... There must be some decent load and hold time on the EBC run as it starts at 9psi at about 2500rpm. A normal dyno run should start at around atmospheric pressure.

Second graph looks much more genuine with 18psi at 3500rpm which is pretty much what is expected from a GT3076R with a 0.63 :)

Edited by SimonR32

Its a good result :thumbsup: , high comp engine with adjustable cam gears would make a turbo spool earlier. Plus different dynos with different sittings would read differently. Compare to one of my earlier runs using the same dyno:

RB25DE high comp, adj cam gear, 3076 .63 ext gate, with a bleed valve

post-36975-0-72596700-1311255208_thumb.jpg

Standard RB25DET motor, stock head, ATR43G3 int gate, with Bleed valve. My run ended early due to misfire while still making 294rwkws.

post-27032-0-82969500-1311261862_thumb.jpg

They looks similar in terms of Power VS Response VS KM/H. But I know the SS-1 PU is more responsive. :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Give it 40psi and send it to the moon
    • I suspect 550s are on the large side for happy operation with a stock/Nistune RB20 ECU. The Hitachi ECU doesn't love short pulse width operation, and the RB20 doesn't need much fuel at idle. Big injectors can be unpleasant. This could be contributing.
    • Yeah, I still don't know why the idle speed control can't catch the falling RPMs. In the Consult logs I see the AAC duty cycle rising, but suddenly it goes lean and the engine stalls. Anyways, the relevance here is the DW 550cc injectors are probably the same. So if OP has similar issues I would be tempted to finger those injectors as problematic for whatever reason vs the ECU failing for some reason.
    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
×
×
  • Create New...