Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

See you make a version of the g25-550 and. 660 aswell. Do you have any test of the smaller turbos on the rb25det for us that not hunt big power but whant a good responsive setup for a unopende engine? Looking for a good upgrade for my rb25 powered Datsun 260z. Whant something around the 350-400whp mark. And dont whant a high flow.

Best regards Stian 

5 hours ago, Genifx said:

See you make a version of the g25-550 and. 660 aswell. Do you have any test of the smaller turbos on the rb25det for us that not hunt big power but whant a good responsive setup for a unopende engine? Looking for a good upgrade for my rb25 powered Datsun 260z. Whant something around the 350-400whp mark. And dont whant a high flow.

Best regards Stian 

Hi I found G25 turbine is too small for a Rb25det motor. I recommend our ATR43SS-2 in T3 .71 turbine, its very similar to a G30-660 with better response. Its supplied as a brand new turbo internally wastgated.  

  • Thanks 1
5 hours ago, hypergear said:

Hi I found G25 turbine is too small for a Rb25det motor. I recommend our ATR43SS-2 in T3 .71 turbine, its very similar to a G30-660 with better response. Its supplied as a brand new turbo internally wastgated.  

How many kws can you see out of it?

Assume the application is for internal gate. 

Far as internal gate concern SS-2 makes around 300rwkws on P98 fuel in either .63 or .71 turbine housing. Response are about the same between the two. 

  • Like 1
22 minutes ago, hypergear said:

Assume the application is for internal gate. 

Far as internal gate concern SS-2 makes around 300rwkws on P98 fuel in either .63 or .71 turbine housing. Response are about the same between the two. 

 

Can you link me to the correct one on your site?

.71 P98 definitely hit 300kws without being to laggy?

Yes correct. Link is at:

https://hypergearturbos.com/product/atr43ssiwg/

SS2 Profile, T3 .71 Turbine housing, Ball bearing upgrade, and oil line kit. Thats pretty much it.

 

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 1
8 hours ago, hypergear said:

Yes correct. Link is at:

https://hypergearturbos.com/product/atr43ssiwg/

SS2 Profile, T3 .71 Turbine housing, Ball bearing upgrade, and oil line kit. Thats pretty much it.

 

Thank you. Was going for a Pulsar g25or30/660 but then i will look at this. 👍

Quick spool up and respons is the main thing in this can aswell as the sweet sound of the g-series turboes.

Hard time to find ppl using in the size cus every one that post dynos is almost only big power.

Dont know if i can manage to fit a new exhaust manifold this year or if i have to use the stock the first year.

  • 4 weeks later...
On 26/06/2024 at 11:36 PM, hypergear said:

Yes correct. Link is at:

https://hypergearturbos.com/product/atr43ssiwg/

SS2 Profile, T3 .71 Turbine housing, Ball bearing upgrade, and oil line kit. Thats pretty much it.

 

How much more power and lag does the ss3 make?

SS3 has very similar to a SS2. It needs to be externally gated for boost control. Performance wise about 60kws more in comparison.

Edited by hypergear
  • Thanks 1
10 hours ago, hypergear said:

SS3 has very similar to a SS2. It needs to be externally gated for boost control. Performance wise about 60kws more in comparison.

Thank you, damn want to stay internal. Just have to replace with forged pistons and rods now. So was going for a few more kws

  • 3 weeks later...
On 26/06/2024 at 11:36 PM, hypergear said:

Yes correct. Link is at:

https://hypergearturbos.com/product/atr43ssiwg/

SS2 Profile, T3 .71 Turbine housing, Ball bearing upgrade, and oil line kit. Thats pretty much it.

 

How much difference going internal to externally gated?

  • 3 weeks later...

ATR43SS-1 is better suited for a RB20det engine. SS-2 is suited for a Rb25det engine. Externally gated kit is highly recommended as it makes more power on less boost pressure with higher power ceiling. I've attached an example of our high flowed OP6 turbocharger running both internal and external gate.  Turbo is boosted to a point that no more power could be made. Car's an R33 with built Rb25det engine. 

op6powerall.jpg

op6boostall.jpg

The SS-2 made 317rwkws V 21U G3 high flowed made 282rwkws at a point that no more power could be made on a built RB25det Neo motor on P98 / Ron 93 fuel. 21U high flow is about 400RPM more responsive making 20psi by 3600RPM, while SS2 made 20psi by 3800RPM.  High flowed Rb25det turbo drives very similar to stock turbo.

My recommendation is still ATR43SS-2 in T3 .71 rear housing with ball bearing core, as it has stronger power delivery with higher power capacity. 

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...

We've been working on all sort of different types of turbos with majority of work load shifting towards Euros in the last few years. The Skylines are more of a hobbie then a daily, at least its like that in Australia. I will update photos from some of our latest RB jobs. Whats recent is G30 turbine housing externally gated plumb back kit using T3 .83 geninue housing. It can be made to suit G35, G40 and G42 units. External gate optional. 

 

IMG20241114115712.jpg

IMG20241114115603.jpg

IMG20241114115614.jpg

IMG20241114115635.jpg

IMG20241114115653.jpg

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 4
40 minutes ago, hypergear said:

majority of work load shifting towards Euros in the last few years

That's great news

Skyline scene is a bit odd (yes I've been following that particular Facebook page), and most of the owners are young boys with no money.

On 8/24/2024 at 12:23 PM, hypergear said:

The SS-2 made 317rwkws V 21U G3 high flowed made 282rwkws at a point that no more power could be made on a built RB25det Neo motor on P98 / Ron 93 fuel. 21U high flow is about 400RPM more responsive making 20psi by 3600RPM, while SS2 made 20psi by 3800RPM.  High flowed Rb25det turbo drives very similar to stock turbo.

My recommendation is still ATR43SS-2 in T3 .71 rear housing with ball bearing core, as it has stronger power delivery with higher power capacity. 

I thought that the high flowed rb25det turbos were a lot more responsive than the stock one? Would that mean better low end torque?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
    • Waaay ahead of ya....(evil laugh!!) Will show the fitment and spec details later when it isnt as rainy !
×
×
  • Create New...