Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Most i seen was 266kw from my car 25psi dropping e85 and that was with the larger rear housing .86
Stock bottom end sr but
I would reccomend going the atr28ss2 in bb with .64 rear housing more responsive due to the smaller rear and i made 280kw with this
On a built motor with larger cams and custom exhaust manifold i would see it making 300kw

Action Dan: Yes. the factory exhaust manifold is a restriction and SR needs cams to make power. Plus your usual free flow FMIC, induction and exhaust. 

Ask tao im sure he can arrange that
Most results ar from rbs but usually all in by 4000rpm and there only running t3 single scroll
Twinscroll will help alot hence why evos get away with 300kw turbos but are still responsive

This particular SR20det engine is something built by forcedmotor works 4 years ago. It run one of our ATR45SAT turbo compete and won WTAC Open class in 2016 and is still a current world record holder of the fastest SR on Wakefield. Its on a single T3 scroll manifold running external gate, and that pumped 400rwkws on E85 fuel, 28psi by 4250RPM. Far as I know its just a standard rebuild, no VCT with forged pistons with 264  / 256 Tomei Pro cams. For around 350rwkws mark I will be recommending this turbocharger.

s14enginebay.jpg

 

atr45sat399rwkw.jpg

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...

Some results to share, This time is from Justin's drift car running with one of our ATR45SAT ceramic ball bearing turbocharger. 

fronts.JPG

R33 GTST unopened engine.

HyperGear Atr45SAT Ceramic ball bearing turbo

6 boost manifold

Turbosmart 45mm Gate

Ebay 600x300x100 Cooler

ID 1000cc Injectors

460 lph Fuel Pump

3 inches turbo back exhaust

Haltech ECU

E85 fuel

Car made 397rwkws @ 21psi on a conservative tune for stock engine. Should see 420rwkws at full potential. 

carondyno.jpg

atr45397rwkws.jpg

 

I would high flow the factory turbocharger using a ball bearing core with a G2 or a SS15 profiled wheel sets. the SS15 is a better choice for power and response. 

For the best result use an Rb25det turbo. For a Ball bearing, billet wheel Ss15 profiled highflow looking at $1500 to complete including oil line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...