Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Stao, what's the main difference between the G1 - 4? If I have the G2 0.82 and am making 285rwkw on 15psi, I would expect similar on 17psi as above. Not that it's a bad thing at all :laugh: just curious as to my results compared to the above.

I guess G1-G4 's all got different wheel profiles and rated differently in HP, Lower HP rated turbo will produce better response. How ever most of our turbos are engineered specifically to what a customer's asking for, so its not really following the guided specs.

The twicked ATR43G3 is running a 58T 76mm which was custom made, it seems to flow lot more air down low in a .70 comp housing. It is interesting because larger comp housings has shown greater lagness in my previous testings but it seems to make the turbo more responsive with RB25s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The twicked ATR43G3 is running a 58T 76mm which was custom made, it seems to flow lot more air down low in a .70 comp housing. It is interesting because larger comp housings has shown greater lagness in my previous testings but it seems to make the turbo more responsive with RB25s.

I believe mine had a 58T 76mm from memory, but with only a 0.5 front cover... May be interesting if I end up going a RB25NEO to see results with either my 0.63 or upgrade to a 0.84

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need a .82 rear for the RB25det Neo engines. You will find the .63 is restrictive up on the top.

Little more updates. This is the result from Harey. from PU high flow with a R34 GTST. Its got abit of exhust and intake restrictions. Final run of 280rwkws @ 17psi 98 fuel.

Sheet:

puhighflow279rwkw.jpg

puhighflow279rwkwboost.jpg

As some of yous already seen from the public thread, This is our updated 21U R33 GTST factory turbo high flow profile.

I did read many posts in regarding to high flowing with the factory 21U RB25det R33 turbine housings. I did some testing in it with a modified exhaust wheel, I like to share this information publicly and I believe this is the absolute max this thing can flow.

I also managed to hold 20psi flat with that small housing using a wastegate controller and a high pressure actuator on 98 fuel.

The max power it managed was a stunning 297rwkws when its cold, with final run of 273rwkws consistent. The little sucker was burning red hot.

273rwkwhf.jpg

357658boost.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need a .82 rear for the RB25det Neo engines. You will find the .63 is restrictive up on the top.

Little more updates. This is the result from Harey. from PU high flow with a R34 GTST. Its got abit of exhust and intake restrictions. Final run of 280rwkws @ 17psi 98 fuel.

Sheet:

post-a306975-279rwkw-dyno1.JPG

post-a306976-279rwkw-dyno2.JPG

As some of yous already seen from the public thread, This is our updated 21U R33 GTST factory turbo high flow profile.

I did read many posts in regarding to high flowing with the factory 21U RB25det R33 turbine housings. I did some testing in it with a modified exhaust wheel, I like to share this information publicly and I believe this is the absolute max this thing can flow.

I also managed to hold 20psi flat with that small housing using a wastegate controller and a high pressure actuator on 98 fuel.

The max power it managed was a stunning 297rwkws when its cold, with final run of 273rwkws consistent. The little sucker was burning red hot.

357658.jpg

357658boost.jpg

Video footage for all 3x runs are recorded:

video.JPG

I'm little bit concert with high back pressure. So this profile will not yet be commercially available after further testing and examination for component wear.

Why is the boost dropping off in the PU hiflow its 0.82 isnt it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be from intake and exhaust restrictions and injector seal leakage. Also Trent didn't had too much time adjusting wastegate controller that night. Its getting back on the dyno tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is the boost dropping off in the PU hiflow its 0.82 isnt it?

Yeah I am still sorting some things out. As Tao said lots more to try. We also just discovered the front injector is causing a boost leak so that will need to get fixed before any more testing. I will have more results next thursday.

We have a few more wastegate settings to try as well as dropping the exhaust as its suspected to be a bit restrictive.

That 279rwkw is actually at only 15.8psi so plenty left in it.

Its a bit different to Tao's demo car cause all these things are sorted and you get a direct comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I am still sorting some things out. As Tao said lots more to try. We also just discovered the front injector is causing a boost leak so that will need to get fixed before any more testing. I will have more results next thursday.

We have a few more wastegate settings to try as well as dropping the exhaust as its suspected to be a bit restrictive.

That 279rwkw is actually at only 15.8psi so plenty left in it.

Its a bit different to Tao's demo car cause all these things are sorted and you get a direct comparison.

Fair enough look forward to the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further updates:

This is the very first prototype of our Duel Ceramic Ball bearing turbo CHRA. Its running two air craft caged ceramic ball bearing cartridges in a fully CNC machined billet aluminum bearing casing. Its been then inserted into a GT28 bearing housing for water cooling ability. This turbo is oil and water cooled.

PICT0012.JPG

PICT0011.JPG

PICT0014.JPG

Short Video, span by a small compressor.

Above CHRA is made to suit a OP6 Rear housing for 500HP high flowing applications. Since OP6 housings are running short I will be testing it in a .63 ATR43 rear housing with a .70 Comp housing. Hopefully it works according to plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they test to work 100% you'll be looking to spending about $1900 to build in any of the brand new ATR43 units or around $1600 with Kai high flows.

Also The high flow page has been updated. 2x New high flow profiles has been added.

Standard high flow options using standard housings:

21U R33 turbo: 240rwkws

OP6 R34 Turbo: 260rwkws

Kai High flow using standard housings:

21U R33 turbo: 270rwkws

OP6 R34 turbo: 290rwkws

PU high flow using .82 rear housing:

21U / OP6 turbo: 300rwkws

Detailed information is at our website:

http://www.digi-hardware.com/rb25t3hiflow.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe these are becoming a little bit more expensive because they are bolt on items ( i think ) ? but u are correct u can buy garrett items for far less but these are not bolt on i guess :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks good stao,but wow the prices r gettin really high 4 a custom built turbo? :)

GCG charge about the same for a bb highflow, I wouldnt say it is high for what you are getting.

Can pay less for a genuine Garrett turbo

I really doubt this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any recommendations on a decent replacement manifold that doesnt break the bank or require additional mods for the stock turbo setup? I figure if I'm going to pull the manifold off anyway to fix the studs might as well replace it. 
    • So I checked the turbo out today. Very minimum play at all just enough for the oil to take up when it's running. I did find an exhaust leak at the manifold. 1 stud all the way in the front is missing and the one all the way in the back is broken off. Front has visible signs of an exhaust leak. I'll fix that soon but that's not my problem still.  I also found that the nipple coming off the turbo had the hose capped off and a hose ran from the j-pipe by the bov going to the wastegate. I removed that hose and capped that nipple and put the turbo nipple hose back on the wastegate.  There was a ton of oil residue all through the charge side of the intercooler piping going to the throttle bodg. I'm thinking that's from the pcv. Doesn't seem to be coming from the turbo that was all clean on the pipes side.  Haven't had a chance to check fuel pressure yet, haven't had time been having to pull a lot of doubles at work. I did pick up some carb cleaner to clean the iacv but wanted to make sure I had a fresh gasket in case the old one rips when I pull it off.  I'm waiting on a MAF that was supposed to be here today but delayed to Monday. Have a double Monday and Friday and work all of next weekend so going to try to find some time in the middle of the week to try that out. Did about a 10m trip around the block today and towards the end the issues were coming back. Fingers crossed on this MAF but if not just going to throw a fuel pressure gauge in and see where I'm at.  Did notice today that I can definitely hear the injectors pulsing. Very audible clicking coming from them. Assuming that's normal? Should also mean CAS is functioning somewhat properly. After it warmed up when I started it the intermittent misfires came in again. Did start doing that before it was fully warmed up. 
    • This morning I carefully reinstalled the manifold and started looking at a couple of things I need to do.  Heat wrap arrived sometime today so I popped into the shed with the missus dishwashing gloves and started wrapping the first half of the dump and the screamer/plumb back.  Once I do the second half I'll be able to final fit the turbo and exhaust up.  Also pulled the harness out today and started terminating it at the ECU end. A connector is done, just need to run the remaining wires that arent in the harness - 12v, gnd and couple I/O
    • A31 is pretty much the same thing without HiAIDS I mean CAS, no improvement lol. Not to late to send it.
    • Thanks for all the replies! I also wanted to ask if wheels that were fitted on Ford Falcons would fit the 350GTs as well? In the area I'm at there aren't that many options for secondhand wheels and new ones here are way out of my budget. From what I've seen, most of the wheels that are available that were fitted on Ford Falcons have an offset of +33 to +36, with a centre bore of 70.5mm whereas the stock 350GT's ones are 66mm, can't seem to find any hubcentric rings that fit that difference though. 
×
×
  • Create New...