Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A local circuit guy here in a R32 Gts-t (350rwkw, hollenger seqentual....etc), he got ABS of a VS Commo installed on it, and he recons in 2 race meets it payed for it self in saved tyres (and he's a Dunlop R dealer). Dosn't help that Baskervill is like driving on a off road corse.

Duncan: I've worked on a std R33, R33 V-spec, and R33 V-spec N1, and they are all 3 channel.

ABS has def saved me from flat spotting R comps (R33 GTR) however the GTR systems are not the best even up to the R34 version. Basically once it has activated you have to get right off of the brake pedal to get it to stop rather than just modulate the pedal. I believe more modern ABS systems allow you to modulate the brake pedal to turn it off.

Ben we were looking at 33 but I was sure it was 4 channel, maybe vspec is different? The R32 thing is horribly slow but that is good in a lot of ways, it will never be too obtrusive lol

Michael if the only thing you are missing is the ABS unit they are pretty common, in fact we have 1 or 2 around. But you probably need more like the brake lines as well. You are probably better to just go without unless you are ready for the stuffing around to get it all back in.

Best brakes for street and light track use are standard (maybe new lines and discs, definately with good quality fluid). If you want more than that you would be mad to go past the G4/D2 8 piston calipers and discs.

they are all 3 channel. 32, 33, even 34. same goes for vspecs etc. the only other difference is N1s etc with no abs.

The three channel/four channel thing doesn't make a huge difference.

A three channel ABS system still detects a locked rear in the same way as a 4 channel.

The difference between the two is that a three channel will release (reduce, really) line pressure on BOTH rear brakes. A four channel only does the locked side.

Basically you are trading rear end stability (3 channel) for slightly more retardation (4 channel).

The 34 N1(<-Pic) Marlin and I took in targa last year has I believe a Mitsubishi magna 4 channel ABS system.

I don't know anymore than that though.

Yeah, it had somethin real funky going on..... Everyone tells me that it's impossible to get ABS working in conjunction with twin master cylinders and brake bias, yes that car had it.... DJR... shed any light on that mate?

I believe the bias didn't adjust front/rear as you would expect, but actually diagonally..... why would ya??? lol... rest assured, after we tested it and found it "out of adjustment", with a little moment, we got it right and left it well alone.

I think the theory behind the Magna/Evo ABS pump was it's meant to be quicker reacting.

Yeah, it had somethin real funky going on..... Everyone tells me that it's impossible to get ABS working in conjunction with twin master cylinders and brake bias, yes that car had it.... DJR... shed any light on that mate?

I believe the bias didn't adjust front/rear as you would expect, but actually diagonally..... why would ya??? lol... rest assured, after we tested it and found it "out of adjustment", with a little moment, we got it right and left it well alone.

I think the theory behind the Magna/Evo ABS pump was it's meant to be quicker reacting.

To be honest I can't think of a reason why you couldn't get ABS to function on a dual master cylinder set up - one with bias adjustment at that. Ofcourse it tends to depend on how you go about the bias adjustment.

If you think about it a reservoir is just a reservoir so that doesn't affect anything.

The twin cylinders are just a different way of proportioning the fluid (ie instead of having springs in the bore of the conventional system)

The bias adjustment just alters the amount of travel each cylinder has relative to your pedal.

The only thing I can think would be a problem is running a pressure limiter for the rears. But if you have a look at the stock set up & the knee points etc even that doesn't appear to be a problem.

So in short it should work. Just don't quote me on that....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...