Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A local circuit guy here in a R32 Gts-t (350rwkw, hollenger seqentual....etc), he got ABS of a VS Commo installed on it, and he recons in 2 race meets it payed for it self in saved tyres (and he's a Dunlop R dealer). Dosn't help that Baskervill is like driving on a off road corse.

Duncan: I've worked on a std R33, R33 V-spec, and R33 V-spec N1, and they are all 3 channel.

ABS has def saved me from flat spotting R comps (R33 GTR) however the GTR systems are not the best even up to the R34 version. Basically once it has activated you have to get right off of the brake pedal to get it to stop rather than just modulate the pedal. I believe more modern ABS systems allow you to modulate the brake pedal to turn it off.

Ben we were looking at 33 but I was sure it was 4 channel, maybe vspec is different? The R32 thing is horribly slow but that is good in a lot of ways, it will never be too obtrusive lol

Michael if the only thing you are missing is the ABS unit they are pretty common, in fact we have 1 or 2 around. But you probably need more like the brake lines as well. You are probably better to just go without unless you are ready for the stuffing around to get it all back in.

Best brakes for street and light track use are standard (maybe new lines and discs, definately with good quality fluid). If you want more than that you would be mad to go past the G4/D2 8 piston calipers and discs.

they are all 3 channel. 32, 33, even 34. same goes for vspecs etc. the only other difference is N1s etc with no abs.

The three channel/four channel thing doesn't make a huge difference.

A three channel ABS system still detects a locked rear in the same way as a 4 channel.

The difference between the two is that a three channel will release (reduce, really) line pressure on BOTH rear brakes. A four channel only does the locked side.

Basically you are trading rear end stability (3 channel) for slightly more retardation (4 channel).

The 34 N1(<-Pic) Marlin and I took in targa last year has I believe a Mitsubishi magna 4 channel ABS system.

I don't know anymore than that though.

Yeah, it had somethin real funky going on..... Everyone tells me that it's impossible to get ABS working in conjunction with twin master cylinders and brake bias, yes that car had it.... DJR... shed any light on that mate?

I believe the bias didn't adjust front/rear as you would expect, but actually diagonally..... why would ya??? lol... rest assured, after we tested it and found it "out of adjustment", with a little moment, we got it right and left it well alone.

I think the theory behind the Magna/Evo ABS pump was it's meant to be quicker reacting.

Yeah, it had somethin real funky going on..... Everyone tells me that it's impossible to get ABS working in conjunction with twin master cylinders and brake bias, yes that car had it.... DJR... shed any light on that mate?

I believe the bias didn't adjust front/rear as you would expect, but actually diagonally..... why would ya??? lol... rest assured, after we tested it and found it "out of adjustment", with a little moment, we got it right and left it well alone.

I think the theory behind the Magna/Evo ABS pump was it's meant to be quicker reacting.

To be honest I can't think of a reason why you couldn't get ABS to function on a dual master cylinder set up - one with bias adjustment at that. Ofcourse it tends to depend on how you go about the bias adjustment.

If you think about it a reservoir is just a reservoir so that doesn't affect anything.

The twin cylinders are just a different way of proportioning the fluid (ie instead of having springs in the bore of the conventional system)

The bias adjustment just alters the amount of travel each cylinder has relative to your pedal.

The only thing I can think would be a problem is running a pressure limiter for the rears. But if you have a look at the stock set up & the knee points etc even that doesn't appear to be a problem.

So in short it should work. Just don't quote me on that....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...