Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wierd....can't find the story on any fairfax sites

It was on my SMH RSS feed, which is why I saw it...

but when I went to the link, the story was "not found".

would be nice if fairfax tried to squash the story ..

Edited by moneypit

Hahaha yes I would love to see this car crushed. Imagine the lawsuit it would kick up...

Can bet if it was an import it would be seeing the crusher - willing to bet they make exceptions for half million dollar exotics.

Hahaha yes I would love to see this car crushed. Imagine the lawsuit it would kick up...

Can bet if it was an import it would be seeing the crusher - willing to bet they make exceptions for half million dollar exotics.

regardless of how rare the car is it should still be crushed. if it was any one else then their car would be in the crusher!

well he doesn't own the car, so crushing is stupid as it only punishes the owner of the car, not the driver, so the people who are saying to crush it should grow a brain.

i'm guessing he will lose his job, not just because of the fact that he will lose his licence (high profile case so he will more than likely be made an example of) but because he has damaged the image of the business he works for, and also because the car was scheduled for reviews by other people during the week, so i'm guessing the company that owns the car will think twice about letting the financial review's motoring writers test any of their cars. they may even be able to take legal action against the driver, or the financial review if any of the other testers had paid money to test it.

Can bet if it was an import it would be seeing the crusher - willing to bet they make exceptions for half million dollar exotics.

I wouldn't be too sure on that one. Apparently half the impound yards are astons, GT3's etc taken off the midlife crisis set. I know they were hunting a GT3 in victoria for quite some time, don't know if they got him or not.

Don't tell us to grow a brain when we're clearly talking in hypotheticals here...I didn't think we'd have to acknowledge that the car isn't owned by the driver in order to make that joke.

I'm actually against car crushing full stop.

Also I think there's a difference between the impound yard and a car being crushed. Sure the impound yards might be full of exotics...but I'm saying once the cars are on death row, I think you'll find a double standard whereby some teenager's $15,000 import isn't blinked at whilst half a million dollars worth of exotic might be given a second chance. Would be interesting to know if there are exceptions for these types of cars or if the law is straight cut on the matter.

I wonder if they would crush it at all? Nothing like a pissed off company who stands to loose half a million dollars to fund a lawsuit challangeing the legality of car crushing...

Or maybe it wouldn't even get that far

In NSW they can only crush the car if it's owned only by the driver who committed the offence, that's why all of my cars are in joint names. Plus finance companies, including banks, have mounted legal arguments that their percuniary interests can't be put aside by the actions of a driver. That's why so few cars have actually been crushed.

Legally I would be very surprised if Ateco doesn't put forward a case to get their car back straight away. They shouldn't be commercially penalised for the actions of someone else.

Cheers

Gary

BTW; the alleged offence occured "in the West Australian wheatbelt"

well he doesn't own the car, so crushing is stupid as it only punishes the owner of the car, not the driver, so the people who are saying to crush it should grow a brain.

i'm guessing he will lose his job, not just because of the fact that he will lose his licence (high profile case so he will more than likely be made an example of) but because he has damaged the image of the business he works for, and also because the car was scheduled for reviews by other people during the week, so i'm guessing the company that owns the car will think twice about letting the financial review's motoring writers test any of their cars. they may even be able to take legal action against the driver, or the financial review if any of the other testers had paid money to test it.

+1. At least some speak sense

This was in WA so please stop trying to push your crapper eastern states hoon laws on us :)

I was surprised it was only seized for 7 days after the revised laws they brought in a couple of weeks ago (where apparently they changed it so they can be seized for 28 days for a first offence) but it seems they are only applying that to unlicensed drivers :)

A police spokesman said: "The incident should serve to remind drivers that regardless of a car’s capabilities, excessive speed is a contributing factor in about 60 people dying on our roads each year."

Lol so I wonder how many of those 60 people killed last year were hit by flying Ferrari's??

Give the Ferrari back to the owner, FFS it aint his fault. Poor guy. I don't understand these laws at all; some one gets done speeding in the car, so to punish them, they take the car away from the owner....

Stupid politics. If some one took my half million dollar Ferrari away i'd be on there door step with 50 lawyers demanding it back that minute.

Edited by PM-R33

Gotta love how they say " excessive speed is a contributing factor "

Note: Excessive speed does not necceserily imply driving over the speed limit

and I would love to now what "contributing factor" actualy means...

Also... a whole 60 ppl? as sad as it is, in reality it is a very small number...

A lot more people die from prety much anything else every year.

A lot more people get murdered every year yet we dont see any massive campaighns to fight that...

Now who would like to guess why that is?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
    • Shock tower brace is in +5Kw....LOL  
×
×
  • Create New...