Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All them Jap cars are running full drag slicks and are far from street registered, still impressive for the time period back in the day. Fair bit of difference between say 17" Mickey T Et streets and 15" Hoosier Drag Slicks

All them Jap cars are running full drag slicks and are far from street registered, still impressive for the time period back in the day. Fair bit of difference between say 17" Mickey T Et streets and 15" Hoosier Drag Slicks

No doubt!

I was just mentioning it so people didn't make wild claims and look silly :)

Your car is massively impressive!!!

Awesome effort on breaking the 9 sec barrier!

It looks like you did it a hell of a lot easier than the guys in that old Jap footage... Even with the help of slicks a couple of them were fighting the car the whole way down the track. By comparison your pass almost looks boring - so it shows how much better your suspension and aero setup must be.

Maximum traction on take off, u can actually see the tyre marks u have left like a mini tramp...is that expected with your power level?

Also, why did u decide to stick with the 2.6ltr capacity?

Maximum traction on take off, u can actually see the tyre marks u have left like a mini tramp...is that expected with your power level?

Also, why did u decide to stick with the 2.6ltr capacity?

It's a JUN 2.7 mofo :D

Maximum traction on take off, u can actually see the tyre marks u have left like a mini tramp...is that expected with your power level?

Also, why did u decide to stick with the 2.6ltr capacity?

Hi mate, we have a JUN 2.7L stroker but swapped the oversized pistons for a brand new set of standard bore size CP pistons, its still retains 2.6L, and why 2.6???? because they rev hard and for some reason everyone thinks more Capasity is better. But not for what we want to do. 3+Litres are just slow reving and sound like shit.

Hi mate, we have a JUN 2.7L stroker but swapped the oversized pistons for a brand new set of standard bore size CP pistons, its still retains 2.6L, and why 2.6???? because they rev hard and for some reason everyone thinks more Capasity is better. But not for what we want to do. 3+Litres are just slow reving and sound like shit.

I agree with u 100% that the 3ltr is slower revving and don't sound anywhere near to that of a 2.6 - I can make this statement as I've had both...2.6 all the way :)

Amazing Ben! Will watch videos when i get home for some more ear porn oooh yeah :D

Sucks about the gearbox, tends to happen though when going as hard as you are.

What is the next event you are aiming for?

They probably were...it's been a while :)

Definitely fastest/quickest H-pattern street GTR either way.

Looks like there is plenty left in, too.

Ah the old term "street". :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yes, every CU on the bus is available via the Consult port, but whether the scanner you are using is capable of talking to the TCU, the ABS/TCS modules, etc etc, is what is at question here. Many of them are only for engine codes. So, if you have one of those, you won't know if the ABS is having a bitch.
    • That's now. R chassis Skylines come from a time when the tolerance in the ADRs was a bit more....slack. My car, on 235/35-17, which is damn near the exact same size as the original 205/55-16, is pretty much bang on correct indicated speed across the whole legal range. That's demonstrated with constant speed run over 5km, and GPS speed. It's just the luck of the draw. My particular speedo head has to be the thing that is "calibrated" that way, because everything else (the diff ratio, the gearbox and the speedo drive**) are all same same as most other Skylines. **OK, so the speedo drive is a Navara unit to drive the R32's cable, not the electronic unit than an R33/4 would normally have with teh same gear on it. Otherwise, I applaud your OCD tendencies, and I would do the same if I needed to.
    • Not too sure, I believe the Nissan consult port does everything? Also just filled up the reservoir to full and the light is still on. The float seems to move up and down fine.
    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph on 255/40 17, so again conservative Google says manufacturers need to set the speedo from 4 to 10% slower than actual road speed.....for safety.....and compliance  After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
×
×
  • Create New...