Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have an IHI twin turbo set off two different WRX engines for an rb25/30 build im doing for my drift car. I was told by the guy who was running it he was making just shy of 300rwkw on an rb25 with fairly good response. He also told me they would in theory be even more responsive on an rb25/30 because of the 3L bottom end and because I’m using a 6 throttle RB26 inlet manifold. The manifolds that came with the head and turbos are way too high and so I asked 6boost to make me some new ones. He then told me -

Do you want to do this to be different?? Or to make power, or think it'll spool earlier?? As my best advise would be to sell it and go single, GT35 will make more power and out spool it, look neater and be less hassle, however if you must have twin manifolds, they would be $1400inc and take 1 week to build for you.

And I said -

hi mate,

I was told these came off a built rb25 and made just shy of 300rwkw. I was also told, because I’m putting them on a RB25/30 they will spool faster then on the RB25. I’m only after a solid 300rwkw. I’ve always liked the idea of twins, (not trying to be different) but it was always too much hassle and money to go that way. I was going to go the GT35 and then I found the head on eBay for real cheap. The turbo's are in immaculate condition (almost new). I’m also putting a 6-throttle RB26 inlet manifold on the NEO head to improve response.

Do you think these ideas and info sound plausible?

And he said -

The twins will definitely spool slower than a single GT35. Even on an RB26, a GT35 with .82 spool FASTER than the STOCK twins, and makes more power than the biggest bolt on style turbo's the HKS 25/40's, which it out spools these by 1500rpm. The old myth that twins spool earlier is from 10 years ago when single turbo technology was in the 70's still, yet smaller style T28 stuff had been vastly improved. If you’re after response, IMO, the worst thing you could do it fit twins.

Same goes for the 6 throttle intake manifold. They lose about 500rpm of spool; Zoom back to back tested it years ago and found they lost massive midrange. I have found the same thing comparing a GReddy style RB25 intake to a stock intake with top half style plenum. The short runners of either a GReddy or RB26 manifold is what kills the bottom end torque and hence spool. The best possible spool combination you could possibly fit to this engine is the stock lower runners, a Plazmaman top half plenum, and a GT35 with .82 rear. With the VCT connected, you should have 20psi by 3400rpm, and make 300rwkw on 16-18psi, if the engine is built with rods and pistons, you'll make 350-380rwkw on 20-22psi pump fuel no stress at all.

So can some one pleas clarify this for me?? And please tell me what is true.

post-64498-1249094052_thumb.jpgpost-64498-1249094061_thumb.jpgpost-64498-1249094084_thumb.jpg[atta

chment=237597:5.jpg]

post-64498-1249094093_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281440-twin-or-single-please-help/
Share on other sites

If it was making '300rwkw' on a RB25 it would have been on around 3500rpm mark give/take (IMO possibly close to the 4000rpm marker)

Now add in two of them, and only another 500cc - you are not going to see it any better than at least 4500-5000rpm IMO.

Its all pretty much guess work of course because of the unknown spec of the turbos (you other thread said they were hi-flowed?)

Basically forget whatever he was telling you, most of what you have posted above is wrong mate.

2540's are NOT the biggest bolt on's, in fact they are a horrid horrid turbo that HKS should never have sold.

Also im not really sure where you say a 6 T/B setup hurts spool and performance... first i've heard of it.

At the end of the day - two simple questions for you.

How much power do you want?

What is the budget for new turbos?

Answer that - the rest is easy for everyone.

If it was making '300rwkw' on a RB25 it would have been on around 3500rpm mark give/take (IMO possibly close to the 4000rpm marker)

Now add in two of them, and only another 500cc - you are not going to see it any better than at least 4500-5000rpm

The way i read what he said the twin system was making the 300, not a single.

Extra capacity will make the thing spool faster no doubt, but since you dont know how they spool now this doesnt tell you much.

If it were me and my money;

- I sort of like the idea of being a bit different but i'd only try this setup IF

1. you can verify that the turbos are a sensible size

2. you use the manifold you have. I dont see that buying this setup is worth it if you just going to throw the manifold away

- the 26 manifold/throttles probably arent worth the extra cost for only 300kw

- single vs twin is largely a wank - as long as you get something that's sized correctly for your power goal you'll be happy.

That guys style of discussion sets off alarms for me.

I dread to think what that er collection would weigh let alone how it would fit in an engine bay - sheesh .

Firstly WRX turbos are designed to work on a 2L four with a badly screwed up firing order in relation to the exhaust headers layout . The boxershi - er pistons motor fires the adjacent cylinders in each bank before going to the other bank and because the headers go two into one just down stream of each head the exhaust pulsing is all wrong . This is why Rexes make that stupid off cadence "Boxer Burble" especially when Roger Racer pinches the stink pipe off thye side of the house and makes a automotive farter out of it ...

People here are getting 300 Kw out of a GT3076R on - wait for it - the factory RB25 exhaust manifold .

I don't agree with the less torque / "spool" with the GTR inlet system . What they do is let pressure rise very quickly in the cylinders when you bang them open and if there is enough fuel hosed it to keep the AFR's about right then theres a bit more exhaust being produced to help drive the turbo/s into boost . Throttle response and turbine response are not the same thing but they can be better match with a bit of thought put into it .

I find it hard to be objective about the drift world and I wouldn't waste a Skyline or an RB doing it .

Better I think with an AE86 Sprinter or even an old T18 because they are lighter in the bum as well as overall , sort of narrow track to wheelbase ratio and maybe better to steer with the throttle .

I'm sure 6Boost will take your money if you want him to but I reckon it's good money after bad .

Start again , cheers A .

The way i read what he said the twin system was making the 300, not a single.

Extra capacity will make the thing spool faster no doubt, but since you dont know how they spool now this doesnt tell you much.

If it were me and my money;

- I sort of like the idea of being a bit different but i'd only try this setup IF

1. you can verify that the turbos are a sensible size

2. you use the manifold you have. I dont see that buying this setup is worth it if you just going to throw the manifold away

- the 26 manifold/throttles probably arent worth the extra cost for only 300kw

- single vs twin is largely a wank - as long as you get something that's sized correctly for your power goal you'll be happy.

That guys style of discussion sets off alarms for me.

hrm true - if he was though, just looking @ the sheer size of the comp housing and wheels... i can't see how its going to be all that responsive :down:

Everyone gauges 'response' differently. Some are fine with power coming on @ 5000rpm as it makes them feel like they have a fast car :)

Just one thing about the GTR intake/ITB's set up. It's a short runner intake design and is better at high end flow than low end torque. The ITB's produce better throttle response, not better low end power. Their is a world of difference between those two and most people mistakenly consider them one and the same.

I have an IHI twin turbo set off two different WRX engines for an rb25/30 build im doing for my drift car. I was told by the guy who was running it he was making just shy of 300rwkw on an rb25 with fairly good response. He also told me they would in theory be even more responsive on an rb25/30 because of the 3L bottom end and because I’m using a 6 throttle RB26 inlet manifold. The manifolds that came with the head and turbos are way too high and so I asked 6boost to make me some new ones. He then told me -

Do you want to do this to be different?? Or to make power, or think it'll spool earlier?? As my best advise would be to sell it and go single, GT35 will make more power and out spool it, look neater and be less hassle, however if you must have twin manifolds, they would be $1400inc and take 1 week to build for you.

And I said -

hi mate,

I was told these came off a built rb25 and made just shy of 300rwkw. I was also told, because I’m putting them on a RB25/30 they will spool faster then on the RB25. I’m only after a solid 300rwkw. I’ve always liked the idea of twins, (not trying to be different) but it was always too much hassle and money to go that way. I was going to go the GT35 and then I found the head on eBay for real cheap. The turbo's are in immaculate condition (almost new). I’m also putting a 6-throttle RB26 inlet manifold on the NEO head to improve response.

Do you think these ideas and info sound plausible?

And he said -

The twins will definitely spool slower than a single GT35. Even on an RB26, a GT35 with .82 spool FASTER than the STOCK twins, and makes more power than the biggest bolt on style turbo's the HKS 25/40's, which it out spools these by 1500rpm. The old myth that twins spool earlier is from 10 years ago when single turbo technology was in the 70's still, yet smaller style T28 stuff had been vastly improved. If you’re after response, IMO, the worst thing you could do it fit twins.

Same goes for the 6 throttle intake manifold. They lose about 500rpm of spool; Zoom back to back tested it years ago and found they lost massive midrange. I have found the same thing comparing a GReddy style RB25 intake to a stock intake with top half style plenum. The short runners of either a GReddy or RB26 manifold is what kills the bottom end torque and hence spool. The best possible spool combination you could possibly fit to this engine is the stock lower runners, a Plazmaman top half plenum, and a GT35 with .82 rear. With the VCT connected, you should have 20psiby 3400rpm, and make 300rwkw on 16-18psi, if the engine is built with rods and pistons, you'll make 350-380rwkw on 20-22psi pump fuel no stress at all.

So can some one pleas clarify this for me?? And please tell me what is true.

Hmmmm... not likely

lets pluck some numbers

Edited by URAS
The best possible spool combination you could possibly fit to this engine is the stock lower runners, a Plazmaman top half plenum, and a GT35 with .82 rear. With the VCT connected, you should have 20psiby 3400rpm, and make 300rwkw on 16-18psi, if the engine is built with rods and pistons, you'll make 350-380rwkw on 20-22psi pump fuel no stress at all.

Hmmmm... not likely

lets pluck some numbers

errm.. on a 25/30 with VCT i think 20psi by 3400 isn't too far off the mark..... the power figures he is quoting are also pretty consistant with the other results I have seen on 35r's....

I think that someone who designs and builds manifolds every day might know what he is talking about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...