Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So we have a coupe of M35's that have been highflowed and tuned with Haltech Interceptor or eManage Ultimate and a few highflowed but running a stock ECU - like mine.

With a 3" turbo back exhaust, it would seem that 200awkw at 19psi (?) was the limit. So we started looking at what could be restricting it.

I looked into the possibility of purchasing the TEPS suction pipe, as their design seemed totally logical and was a direct route from the airbox to the turbo as opposed to the excessive OE design which has 3 bends and 3 different pipe sizes as well as a resonator. I, and a few others held the opinion that the intake was a restrictive factor and part of the reason that 200awkw could not be surpassed.

During this time, "Scotty nm35" decided that making a suction pipe was the only way forward for his car.

(You can find his first attempt HERE)

After a bit of discussion, we decided to make one up for my car as well.

Anyway, the first attempt with the "mk2" design started with the twisty bend from the turbo and, being aluminium, obviously required heat wrapping.

It also required gentle bends for easier airflow and the internal wall needed to be as smooth as possible, so a fair bit of sanding was done to ensure this was the case.

(so you think that C34 turbo's are in a tight spot? Also note that the a/c pipe needed to be bent out of the way - worrying while bending, but all good)

IMG_1550.jpg

Next up, we decided to experiment a little. I wanted as little disruption to the aluminium with smaller silicone joiners than the Scotty's original design.

We also decided to try to implement the OE A/F sensor pipe so the air would be a straight as possible over the sensor. Thought being that this would aid idle and possible stall concerns.

With the angles worked out, this was basically what the result was (3 small silicone joiners, the OE A/F sensor pipe and a "lobster" bend where the breather pipe (and later the BOV return pipe - see issue #2) connect in.

IMG_1555.jpg

Again, the internal wall needed to be as smooth as possible with the silicone joins as small as possible

IMG_1556.jpg

Connected to bottom section and heat wrapped.

IMG_1560.jpg

... and with the breather tube attached and the BOV return barb not yet hooked up.

IMG_1563.jpg

Lastly was the bend from the airbox to the pipe... again, this required heat wrapping as it felt like a radiator top tank while it was bare aluminium but also needed to be removable to get the airbox out for panel filter cleaning. (note. Heat wrapping was re-done after this pic)

IMG_1566.jpg

You can see the extension on the BOV return pipe in the above pic which allowed the lower half of the pipe to be maneuvered to connect with the barb on the intake pipe.

Not 100% necessary, but I much prefer it to flutter... and the wear that would have to cause on the turbo.

End result in a very, very dirty engine bay :cool:

IMG_1576.jpg

Issues!

#1 the first issue with the design was that the suction pipe, being aluminium, the size it is (76mm) and so close to the exhaust manifold, would get too hot to touch. Couldn't be good having the turbo sucking in scorchingly-hot air.... Hence all the heat wrapping.

#2 found that the OE BOV cannot be left venting to atmosphere. this leads to MASSIVE fuel consumption (4.3km/L over 2 days with mostly freeway driving) and also stalling problems when pulling up to an intersection. So I blocked it off which ended both problems but gave the car some very loud "flutter" and a pug that kept being ejected from the BOV pipe and stiting next to the turbo... which meant instant stall, and required fishing out.... which meant some very burned fingers :P

Benefits!

#1 Noticeable ease in which the car accelerates and builds revs (even with the OE dump pipe still on).

#2 More power. Definitely more power.

#2 Whilst the car does use more fuel when accelerating at a decent rate, economy has increased considerably. Particularly whilst cruising!

A/F ratio changes when the stock ECU finished it's "re-lean" period and is now 14.5, which is what most tuners aim for I am told.

So all up I am very, VERY happy.

My car makes power much more easily, I have MUCH better fuel economy thus far (will continue to test as the batch of fuel may have had something to do with it), not noisy (which is a plus for me), and my car no longer makes that annoying "wwWO!" sound that it did before, which I was told happened when the turbo doesn't get enough air and was the same sound as when GTR's such their intake pipe shut.

MASSIVE thanks to "Scotty nm35" who put in a TON of time and 99.999999% of the work ;)

Maybe you should price it up for others mate..... :)

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296472-fisher-mk2-suction-pipe/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Kit would be a bit trickier.

Problem being that mine and Scott's turbo's are indexed differently to both the OE and each others!....so going off ours will probably not fit other M35's...

Damn, you posted this while I was excitedly typing!

If Scotty nm35 was interested, maybe it could be supplied with the turbo flange not welded on, clocked in, marked and finished welded by the fabricator of the purchasers choice? A single weld like that, would only be a small expense.

Just a thought.

Damn, you posted this while I was excitedly typing!

If Scotty nm35 was interested, maybe it could be supplied with the turbo flange not welded on, clocked in, marked and finished welded by the fabricator of the purchasers choice? A single weld like that, would only be a small expense.

Just a thought.

True. The difficulty is with the angles and the (very) limited space.

Even with my car there, it was difficult getting the correct angles... even when we did have the correct angles, the middle section moved slightly when the bottom clamp was done up!

Pain. In. The. Arse.

Having said that, if there is enough interest....

(not dobbing you in for anything Scotty :P )

I dont even remember you taking so many pics Cam. :P

I can definitely make more, although I am just a lowly backyard fabricator. There is a full 2 days work involved for each, which blows the cost out a bit.

No dyno run yet but there is definitely more poke, so it looks like the 200awkw limit may have gone. I will post up a graph of before and after fitting this week hopefully.

:P I forgot you were going to upgrade to the "mk2" design... or will you be improving the design it be a mk3?

Also wanted to post a pic with the stock intake lying on the ground next to the "fisher" intake... just to give people on here an idea of the difference between the two.

Think you could do it while you have yours out?

Got a few other pics, but I felt they were not required :D

Edited by iamhe77

Stockie and Mk 1 intake. I had an idle airflow meter issue with this one as it didn't use the standard airflow tube, and the meter was mounted on the bend.

Cam's intake had no such issues once the blow off valve was plumbed back in.

post-63525-1258363270_thumb.jpg

post-63525-1258363316_thumb.jpg

post-63525-1258363358_thumb.jpg

Thanks mate.

Quick update on economy.

Just filled up today with a week of around town driving (including daily hills for those curious Sydney owners and quite a number of "test" launches ;) ).

62.84L

558kms on the odo

= 8.9km/L OR 11.3L/100kms

Will see what the highway economy is like when I get a couple of hours to go for a cruise.

Edited by iamhe77

So all this is without any aftermarket ecu? you say the factory computer did this all by itself? I am shocked. I always thought that once you put an exhaust/turbo on etc that the factory computer would never be able to deliver good results...(due to the factory tune being so specifically customised to the standard setup) - I am glad to be proven wrong :wave:

So just by opening up the intake a little more you've achieved both more power and more fuel economy...I love it :(

Yes, yes, no.

Yes I am only running the standard ECU.

Yes, it did this all by itself

No, we did not open the intake a little. The hard pipe to the turbo is massively restrictive and going from a rectangular inlet of roughly 40x20mm (let alone the bottom bend) to a 76mm diameter pipe is a fair increase and one that we thought might play havoc with the A/F mixtures.

And yes, Steve. I love it too!

(and was probably more surprised than anyone :wave: )

Edited by iamhe77

The 80mm Mk 3 intake works fantastic, no stalling or mixture issues. Now to find some funds for a dyno run. :P

Cost me around $300 in materials and 2 full days. Each one is uniquely fitted so if anyone wants one they will have to drop the car to me, I cant fit off my car as it means mine is off the road for 2 days. (unless somebody has a spare motor lying around I can work off.)

post-63525-1258938543_thumb.jpg

Edited by scotty nm35

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...