Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maybe we can make this Sticky?? Have a comparison against other GTR's with mods or in stock form.

Got my car dyno'd today, after fitting the PFC & Cam Gears, here's the result & my list of mods.

MODS: GTR Series 3 98model

Power FC & Hand Controller

Cam Gears (Settings +4 & -6)

Stock Turbos (14psi ~<1bar)

Turbosmart bleed valve

Exhaust - stock dumps, 2.5 front pipe into 3inch, stock Cat, 3" from cat back

HKS Pods (No CAI)

Total 249.1kw @ ALL FOUR WHEELS

Thanks to:

1. boys at ICE for help & advice

2. Merli from SAU for letting me know it's kw@all four wheels, & not rwkw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

'95 Series 1 GTR

  • Apexi Front pipe, 3" Cat, 3.5" Catback
  • Standard turbos and 'cooler
  • Boost @ 1.0 bar (Blitz Dual SBC)
  • Power FC
  • HKS pods

234.8kw at the rears

So, theoretically, with cam gears i should get a 15kw increase.. that sounds about right.

dyno.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616575
Share on other sites

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616584
Share on other sites

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

mine made 210kw at all 4 with same mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616593
Share on other sites

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

But a GTR is in rwd mod until traction is loss so in the real world that figure is probably correct, unless of course your doing 8K luanches :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616664
Share on other sites

that seems a bit high for stock turbos!

u should have used ben at race paces dyno it gives much more realistic dyno readings

Hi INASNT,

They're stock as they come.. The car will be at ICE later this week or next. I'm getting the HKS EVC IV fitted, & need new spark plugs.

If you think these figures are overinflated, that's because they were done in RWD...

If the driveshafts were left in and the cars dyno'ed on a 4WD dyno, they would read about 20kw lower.

Hi Merli,

The dyno was done in 4WD!! "shootout mode, I think??".. not 2WD. It was done at Subaru Docklands, in Victoria. In fact it hit around 265rwkw, but that's when we dropped the boost back.

Intersting my PFC Hand Controller, shows my knock levels to average around the 13mark, max I hit was 21... is this OK?

Thanks

meshmesh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616755
Share on other sites

But a GTR is in rwd mod until traction is loss so in the real world that figure is probably correct, unless of course your doing 8K luanches ;)

Yup... absolutely true...

That's why a GTR that spins up 250kw @ wheels will be faster than another RWD car that spins up 250kw @ wheels...

Because when you actually take them to the road, the GTR is making more than 250kw @ wheels :) :) :D :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616815
Share on other sites

The dyno was done in 4WD!! "shootout mode, I think??".. not 2WD. It was done at Subaru Docklands, in Victoria. In fact it hit around 265rwkw, but that's when we dropped the boost back.

Intersting my PFC Hand Controller, shows my knock levels to average around the 13mark, max I hit was 21... is this OK?

Sorry mate, you said in your first post (and this one): 249rwkw, which means "249 rear wheel kilowatts"... Got GTRs dyno'ed on an 4WD dyno, we usually say "249 kw @ all four" so we can differentiate ;) Hope that helps!

Excellent power figures for those mods! I think we all need to get some cam gears for our GTRs soon too! Did they make a big difference in spool up time as well as a good power increase?

Oh, and great choice on boost controller! Let us know how it goes and how it compares to the bleed valve!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30410-gtr-dyno-results/#findComment-616823
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, there's a very minor drift left that happens a few seconds after letting go of the steering wheel, but not enough to bother me. Enjoying the car still!
    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
×
×
  • Create New...