Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it ever better to go just past the limit of adhesion and get a little tail out, assuming it can be done smoothly? If so, when? Or will this be slower since static friction is higher than kinetic friction? (32 GTR, pretty sure the rear LSD is good)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304520-circuit-cornering-theory/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Really, its such an impossible question to answer.

But put simply if the car is moving sideways then it isn’t moving forwards. If your steering angle is sharper then it needs to be then your lateral load is higher then it needs be which means tyres are being asked to do more work then need be….but that’s in the classroom. In a light NA car then it would kill you. In big heavy cars that flop all over the track and have the sort of power only racing cars had in past decades then a bit of crossed up action doesn’t cost you near as much.

If you're trail braking into a corner you can apply an amount of braking that would otherwise have you understeering, but is counteracted by the tail stepping out. It would theoretically let you brake deeper and carry a higher entry speed. Especially with an AWD car, you could rely on the front wheels to pull the car out of the bend if the weight shift didn't regain rear traction when you came off the brakes.

Being able to pull a move like that off consistently and accurately is another question. And, at any rate, using trail braking to slide the car around every corner would only ever be useful in a situation where tyre life wasn't important.

Also, if you saw Jenson Button's second visit to Top Gear they showed footage of the race where he clinched the season. He made a move where he dived up the inside of another car going into an S-bend, and kicked the tail out before the direction change.

He said he did it to make his car wider on the track and intimidate the other driver, stopping the guy from re-passing him and allowing Button to get to the next curve first.

Theoretically, as a tactic to maintain position (rather than improve time) it was better than not doing it.

Is it ever better to go just past the limit of adhesion and get a little tail out, assuming it can be done smoothly? If so, when?

I say yes. we're talking about a road car, or at least very much a production based car, with little to no areo, semi slicks, so limited mechanical grip, going for a single fastest lap time. Not about endurance racing, or even keeping tyres together for a 30 lap stint. And we're not talking about cars with lots of mechanical grip and areo.

I say smoothly loose is the fastest way. You need to be right out at the very edge of the envelope if you are going to get every last bit of time out of the car. Staying perfectly straight means you are staying inside of the car's limits. There's more to be had.

Look at videos of production based touring car racing, like Group A or Group C. Or look at the front runners in IPRA (they run semis). Look at how the top handful of drivers in Superlap do it.

Is it ever better to go just past the limit of adhesion and get a little tail out, assuming it can be done smoothly? If so, when? Or will this be slower since static friction is higher than kinetic friction? (32 GTR, pretty sure the rear LSD is good)

Which part of the corner are you talking about?

Generally you can divide it into four.

1. Braking

2. Turn in

3. Mid corner/apex

4. Corner exit.

Clearly you cannot stay on the limit of adhesion during all four parts.

But it is a common technique in a GTR to trail brake to during turn in. I usually do. The down side is that it can put you at a difficult spot in the mid corner as the car will want to understeer as you get off the brakes.

As for corner exit it is simply a matter of getting the car sufficiently neutral (ie trying to banish the understeer past the apex)so you can get on the powah & also programming the AWD system to keep the car balanced ( ie remove/reduce wheelspin & oversteer)

If you watch the formula fords or other low(ish) powered cars with little aero the fast guys are the ones who look a little loose in the midcorner. This allows them to get the power down earlier on corner exit.

Edited by djr81
I say smoothly loose is the fastest way. You need to be right out at the very edge of the envelope if you are going to get every last bit of time out of the car. Staying perfectly straight means you are staying inside of the car's limits. There's more to be had.

im with him... get on the edge and push the boundaries... even if its slower, it will feel faster and make you happier, theatrics are better than lap times. i like to trail brake to make the back end loose and swing it out a little before the apex, then get on it after the apex, not full drift, but not fully straight. this keeps the rpm up and the car doesnt bog down as much when full grip comes back to the rear wheels. thats with a lowly rb20 though.

I would say depends on the car you are driving as it seems with the evo's the rougher you drive them and make them slide around the faster you go.

With a FR car if you get the tail out then it limits the power you can get down and the exit speed is affected so i would say no.

FF rear out would be OK as aids in turn in with the nose of car moved around to point out of the corner sooner to allow you to get the power on earlier.

Matt

i find that i turn left the hit the gas

and for right handers i turn right then hit the gas

i red this in a book!

so the only logical conclusion is im farken shit hot and ful sik!

repeat above

this man..... he knows.

You mean like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOP3_1TsXs4

This car has also won the UK time attack pro class season for the second year running.

Drving grass lines and ham it up with oober power gets you interwebs stylez points....

don't get me wrong it's looks to be damn fast, but being a bit tidier would probably be quicker. Tank slappers out of a corner is not fast.

Check out the same car midway through this video. It shows you why it has won the UK time attack pro class season for the second year running.

Edited by SABBAi
Drving grass lines and ham it up with oober power gets you interwebs stylez points....

don't get me wrong it's looks to be damn fast, but being a bit tidier would probably be quicker. Tank slappers out of a corner is not fast.

Check out the same car midway through this video. It shows you why it has won the UK time attack pro class season for the second year running.

Agree with the above.

I'm a firm believer that smooth driving is the best way to yield time on a track. That being said as I got faster at a place like PI, the car steps into an 'oversteery' stance around a few corners as I feathered the throttle and re-applied. I also think that the fact I now trail brake into two of the corners allowed me to get under the 1:50 mark. Not only are you saving time in the braking zone but as I get off of the brakes the car steps out a little before getting back onto the gas which helps tighten the line and maintain speed.

Drving grass lines and ham it up with oober power gets you interwebs stylez points....

don't get me wrong it's looks to be damn fast, but being a bit tidier would probably be quicker. Tank slappers out of a corner is not fast.

Check out the same car midway through this video. It shows you why it has won the UK time attack pro class season for the second year running.

I've seen that vid before from 3.15 onwards...much tidier....but then again Silverstone is a beautiful track...long wide sweeping corners.......if only we had those types of tracks in Oz .

Yes I'm sure the video link I posted of that car was a bit of a "promotional video" and clearly was not some of Olly Clarks best work.

Edited by juggernaut1
I say smoothly loose is the fastest way.

That's my thoughts on the subject also.

Having said that, there're obviously much more to it than loose or tight.

You can be loose or tight at differing speeds on the same corner given your angle of entry, exit, throttle pickup point, steering wheel inputs, throttle inputs, degree of braking skill etc. Not to mention what's coming up after the corner or how you navigated the previous section of track, your position in a race (if racing), if you're going for a fastest lap time or going the distance in an enduro.

That's the beauty of corners and racing in general, a million ways to do it wrong and right :P

At the very least finish the race/lap and that will put you ahead of some people :(

the best way is the one that gives you the lowest number on the lap timer. I don't know what it is yet but when I find it I'll let you all know too. actually fk that. I'm keeping it to myself....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...