Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry to bring up such an old thread but im currently in the process of building a RB30DET (Forged 3.0l Bottom end, RB26 Head, GTX45, E85, Built C4). My engine builder has told me we want a 11.5:1 compression ratio because we are using E85. ill be looking to run 30+psi with this. Ive contacted Brad @ Spool Imports to see what pistons he can get his hands on that would get close to this CR. He reckons that they (CP Pistons) wont be able to fit enough Dome on the piston to achieve that. Another issue im looking at is, ill be running fairly high lift cams (between 9-11mm lift) so with such High compression im assuming ill have to fly cut the pistons which would lower the compression again surely. So what CR have people running high boost and E85 run and how did you achieve that CR (original CR of piston, work to block, HG thickness etc)?

you're really in unknown territory there mate. I don't think anyone could give you advice having been in a similar situation. 11.5 CR is stupidly high for a 30+psi goal Internal cylinder pressure is going to be incredible, hope you've got strong internals.

Cam wise I'm sure someone could weigh in, you can measure the valve movement and height of the piston so surely clearance can be worked out beforehand

Yea the motor is being built to go for the 850+rwkw so alot of people seem to be very quiet in regards to advice. my builder has a lot of experiance building High HP and high boost motors, and to my knowledge hes built 2 RB30DETs and both went 600+kw for years so i trust what hes doing. just interesting to see that no one else has gone big power with high comp on E85.

Yea the motor is being built to go for the 850+rwkw so alot of people seem to be very quiet in regards to advice. my builder has a lot of experiance building High HP and high boost motors, and to my knowledge hes built 2 RB30DETs and both went 600+kw for years so i trust what hes doing. just interesting to see that no one else has gone big power with high comp on E85.

is your builder from tas by any chance

Yea the motor is being built to go for the 850+rwkw so alot of people seem to be very quiet in regards to advice. my builder has a lot of experiance building High HP and high boost motors, and to my knowledge hes built 2 RB30DETs and both went 600+kw for years so i trust what hes doing. just interesting to see that no one else has gone big power with high comp on E85.

You would think there has to be a good reason for that.

I take it your engine builder has not used astronomical compression ratios in his previous 600w builds otherwise you wouldn't be asking how to acheive it.

I be questioning the engine builder how he is going to run 11.5, over 30psi and achive it with removing the squish pads from both sides of the combustion chamber to handle those power levels and DET and still remain at 11.5.

Oh hell, did i just drop a spanner in all the works by saying that? :)

There is someone in the US from memory who has a CNC machined open cumbustion chamber design with a custom domed piston to suit, still not near where your engine builder wants to be compression wise.

Most builds in your power bracket are running flat tops with open chambers, so very low compression then winding copious amounts of boost into them, usually in the low 8 compression ratio.

If your engine builder wants 11.5, ask him for the piston part number or to organize to get it custom made......

  • Like 1

I don't know why you would do it just to get a handful more hp off boost; you are fuel constrained (or more specifically octane constrained).

More info on NYTSKY's mate would be interesting!

I don't know why you would do it just to get a handful more hp off boost; you are fuel constrained (or more specifically octane constrained).

More info on NYTSKY's mate would be interesting!

I'm not sure I agree. I reckon that no-one really ever gets close to using up all the anti-knock property of E85 just by winding up the boost and adding timing. You have to stop adding timing a fair way before you can make most E85 engine knock simply because you stop making power.

Trying to use up the knock margin by taking the easy option of just piling in massive boost is unlikely to be better than starting with a more capable base engine (more compression) and adding less boost. Boost is bad. Every psi you pump the air up adds heat that you have to cool out of the air. Every psi that you add to the air is also pretty much added into the exhaust manifold. That adds exhaust contamination back into the cylinder that doesn't have to be there.

I reckon it is smart to try to find how high you can run static comp + boost on E85, still get realistic ignition advance numbers, etc. More static comp is going to make the engine more willing to work off boost and very much improve the boost threshold. What's not to like?

  • Like 1

I'm not sure I agree. I reckon that no-one really ever gets close to using up all the anti-knock property of E85 just by winding up the boost and adding timing. You have to stop adding timing a fair way before you can make most E85 engine knock simply because you stop making power.

Trying to use up the knock margin by taking the easy option of just piling in massive boost is unlikely to be better than starting with a more capable base engine (more compression) and adding less boost. Boost is bad. Every psi you pump the air up adds heat that you have to cool out of the air. Every psi that you add to the air is also pretty much added into the exhaust manifold. That adds exhaust contamination back into the cylinder that doesn't have to be there.

I reckon it is smart to try to find how high you can run static comp + boost on E85, still get realistic ignition advance numbers, etc. More static comp is going to make the engine more willing to work off boost and very much improve the boost threshold. What's not to like?

That is the same thoughtI had up until I talked to some serious enginer builders; I explained exactly that and all dismissed it stating their experiences. It makes the engine more prone to issues with excessive squish velocity and the handful of hp made off boost was offset by the much larger increase in performance by increasing boost pressure.

I agree there is a balance, but it would be dependant on application as with most of these decisions.

There is a simpler way to get the static CR up and it's as simple as using an RB25 Neo turbo head - smaller volume combustion chamber .

It involves changing manifolds or fixing points but if you want super power it can be done .

I agree that extra fuel octane is great but the point of it is to have the optimum ignition firing point for most power rather than finding the limits of the fuel .

As per boost thresholds I'm not sure higher static CRs will bring them down , more likely increase the pre and just post positive pressure torque .

My mentors taught me that there are two benefits of high static CRs .

First , the only way to increase an engines power other than FI revs and capacity increase is the static CR .

second , it's the way to reduce the torque loss (reduced dynamic compression) on an engine with long duration cams .

Thing is that really high cylinder pressure and power loads means having the engine structure more like a diesel though if anything they are worse off because they make comparatively big torque at low revs . It may not be silly to search what Nissan did to RD28s to make them a reliable diesel .

A .

Has anyone had failures from using E85, from what ive read, E85 being an alcohol cleans and washes the cylinders so with a lot of compression/boost and increasing piston clearances from forged pistons or worn stock pistons I wonder if there could be an increased heat and friction build up to cause a piston failure. Could this be possible on an RB30 piston that doesn't have the oil

squirter to help cool the pistons or does the amount of oil outweigh the ethanol content in the cylinders.

Edited by AngryRB
  • Like 1

E85 engines run MUCH cooler than petrol engines. So your worries about heat issues are unfounded.

E85 does clean up all the crap in the combustion chamber and so on.....but not from "washing" as in wet fuel washing like you appear to be worried about. If it was wet fuel washing the bores then you might worry about reduced lubrication, but the cleaning action is actually from steam. So I wouldn't fret there.

There is a concern with old tired engines or engines with forgies that have been built too loose (as in they don't actually need to be built as loose as a lot of people think they do, and if you make the mistake of building it very loose, then yes, it will be loose enough to possibly permit this concern to occur) then you can get a lot of blowby into the oil, and E85 blowby is full of water. So that can upset the lubrication and possibly lead to failures. But it's not because of heat. The absence of an oil squirter probably not an issue given the lower heat issues with E85 - but any potential lubrication issues from water in the oil are a separate issue that may or may not be assisted by having a squirter - as in, I think if the oil has enough water in it to be a problem, the a squirter probably won't help anyway.

Edited by GTSBoy

I know that engines run cooler, my point was more that if lubrication was being lost from the alcohol's cleaning effect then there would be increased heat build up around the top comp ring as friction increases with boost/comp.

What piston to wall clearance would you suggest if dedicated E85? I was thinking a 4thou could allow washing down the skirts on cold start?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...