Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NSW: bling +100 offset rims slammed.

VIC; bling -100 offset rims slammed.

Either way, they both seem a rather pointless to me, this "HellaFlush" trend makes me LOL.

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :)

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :P

r33 40th anniversary?

with you on the good fitment though.. how could anyone be against that :D

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :P

meh, i like cars stockish, i wish my car had a gtst front bar.

function over form. functional ride height, functional tyre fitment, not spending money on kits that dont do shit for aero/on cars that dont go on the track etc.

im loving all the hellaflush business.

Next car will def have tuff fittment

sunken is bad, but hellaflush is poser spec. is there no middle ground? lipped guards with normal tyres at functional height?(good geo, clearance etc)

oops, it wont pull the bitches. honestly, when has a "hellaflush" car ever gotten you a quality girl?, or is it about cred with other guys? insecure much?

I am sure for some it could be they're personal taste, but for most it seems to just be a groupy/"trend" thing.

stock looking 32gtst with 33GTR rims= win, stock looking 33/34gtst/gtt with 34GTR rims = win.

i think we have complete opposite ideas on car modifying.

what you have described sounds like stock ugly shit..

i dont see how hellaflush is poser spec at all but whatever if you dont know what your talking about its a pointless converstaion.

who said anything about pulling bitches? is that what your skyline is for.. my car is functional its for sliding.. if i wana pull bitches ill take my lexus out.

in closing you seem like an idiot, you have a baseless argument soo u start talking about pulling bitches?

meh, i like cars stockish, i wish my car had a gtst front bar.

function over form. functional ride height, functional tyre fitment, not spending money on kits that dont do shit for aero/on cars that dont go on the track etc.

+1

but it all comes down to the primary use of the car.

If its just being driven as a daily, 200kw-300kw wont do much good in peak hour traffic. Hence they spend money on cosmetics.

The ideal height for perfect handling is 350mm guard to hub and to the majority of skyline owners this is too high. Let them enjoy their style of modification whilst you easily drive over speedhumps hehe :P

When guys in melbourne start aesthetically modding though, that's when the problem comes. They either do it well (hamish's car for example) or they go lebo spec ethnic candy colour with shitty wheels and badly fitted kits.

:D

Whats bad about them?

I heard they are very heavy wheels?

Or are they just shit overall?

the look shit

they are heavy

they look shit

build quality is shit

they look shit

offsets are shit

they look shit

they are heavy

they look shit

what style would you prefer? everyone getting around with gtr/r400 bars and mspec side skirts.. oh and lets not forget the "gtr" wing on the gts-t..and the odd badge for good measure

sickkkkkk :P

so fkn true mang!

300kw wont do much good in peak hour traffic.

does me just fine in traffic ;)

The ideal height for perfect handling is 350mm guard to hub and to the majority of skyline owners this is too high.

damn straight..... 350mm looks aids

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...