Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got I've got some 225/45 R18 Bridgestone Potenza RE040 on my AXIS wheels at the moment.

They are getting a bit worn, so I'm after some recommendations.

From reading some old threads it seems that I can either go for more 225/45 R18 tyres, or swap to 235/40 R18 which may give me more options.

I'm looking for something that's good in the wet, and ideally sub $300 a corner.

I've got no brand loyalty, so recommend away.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/312401-tyre-recommendations-for-r18-axis/
Share on other sites

225/45/18 and 235/40/18 will not give the same speedo reading.

With 235/40/18, the speedo will read around 3-4% higher than the 225/45/18

The 225/45/18 is a recommended replacement for the stock RS 17's as it does not upset the speedo.

I am running 235/45/18 on my RS and I can tell you that my speedo reads a little high.

Will be switching to the 225/45's as a correctly reading speedo is a nice thing to have and the extra 10mm over the 230/40 will fill out the guards nicely :P

I've got Toyo Proxes4 all round, 235/40/R18 fronts, 245/40/18 rears, probably best for their prices IMO.

I am running 245/40 18's on my AXIS. The rolling stock diameter of the tyres is within the suggested 3% variance. .its actually very close

I have the Proxes 4 tyres from Toyo and they are the best tyres I have has thus far. . $1,080 fitted for all 4, so $270 each.

The toyo's have a high load rating 97w . . which were one of the highest for that class of tyre. and needed for the 1.8 tonne wagon.

225/45/18 and 235/40/18 will not give the same speedo reading.

With 235/40/18, the speedo will read around 3-4% higher than the 225/45/18

The 225/45/18 is a recommended replacement for the stock RS 17's as it does not upset the speedo.

I am running 235/45/18 on my RS and I can tell you that my speedo reads a little high.

Will be switching to the 225/45's as a correctly reading speedo is a nice thing to have and the extra 10mm over the 230/40 will fill out the guards nicely :D

I have Khumo HR31's on mine, 245/45/18 on ARX wheels, this is quite a jump over std RS 17" rolling dia, but on a gps, my speedo is only out by about 3% as opposed to 9% :blush: with the std wheels and tyres.

The larger rolling diameter hasn't blunted the performance by much, but the ride is muuuuch better than before, even though the aspect ratio of the tyre is smaller and the extra rubber gives a much larger footprint. The extra width will still fit easily under the guards. They are also a nice quiet tyre with astounding amounts of wet weather grip. Also wearing quite nicely after 6000km.

Cheers, Dale

I have Khumo HR31's on mine, 245/45/18 on ARX wheels, this is quite a jump over std RS 17" rolling dia, but on a gps, my speedo is only out by about 3% as opposed to 9% :blush: with the std wheels and tyres.

The larger rolling diameter hasn't blunted the performance by much, but the ride is muuuuch better than before, even though the aspect ratio of the tyre is smaller and the extra rubber gives a much larger footprint. The extra width will still fit easily under the guards. They are also a nice quiet tyre with astounding amounts of wet weather grip. Also wearing quite nicely after 6000km.

Cheers, Dale

interesting.... may have to break out the GPS and give it a little look-see

Bit of a boo boo in my original post. Khumo's are KU 31, not HR 31.

Cost $290 per tyre in 245/45/18 although should be cheaper now, as this size is std equipment on VE 18's and also current falcon 18's.

My speedo is way out already with the current setup. I think it reads about 10% fast vs my tomtom.

A smaller aspect should somewhat address that right? Smaller diameter should give more revolutions for equivalent distance travelled?

Thanks for the recommendations as well. Gives a more focused list to hunt prices on.

My speedo is way out already with the current setup. I think it reads about 10% fast vs my tomtom.

A smaller aspect should somewhat address that right? Smaller diameter should give more revolutions for equivalent distance travelled?

Thanks for the recommendations as well. Gives a more focused list to hunt prices on.

I *think* it should be the other way around - I went from the standard C34 Stagea wheels with 225/50R16s to 245/40R18s and my speedo is much more accurate now, despite the larger rolling diameter...

interesting.... may have to break out the GPS and give it a little look-see

So I took the GPS to check how far out my speedo is on the way down to watching the "Classics" at Phillip Island yesterday.

Since I have upgraded my wheels and using the 235/40/18's that came with, my speedo is 10-11% out (reading higher than actually travelling).

Looks like a good excuse to get fatter tyres next time :(

  • 4 months later...
I am running 245/40 18's on my AXIS. The rolling stock diameter of the tyres is within the suggested 3% variance. .its actually very close

I have the Proxes 4 tyres from Toyo and they are the best tyres I have has thus far. . $1,080 fitted for all 4, so $270 each.

The toyo's have a high load rating 97w . . which were one of the highest for that class of tyre. and needed for the 1.8 tonne wagon.

  • Could someone indicate which measurement must be within the 3% variance , in the quoted post?
  • Is the rim width on the M35 Axis Autech 7.5inch or larger ?
  • I need to know what tyre size will be acceptable when I go through compliance as I wont be around when it happens .
  • Has anyone tried the Toyo Teo plus for 235 40 18?
  • What new recommendations to Axis owners have for replacing the standard size 225 45 18 tyre or are you content with
    that size
  • What normal profile choice do I have if i don't proceed with a low profile tyre?

Thanks in advance

  • Could someone indicate which measurement must be within the 3% variance , in the quoted post?
  • Is the rim width on the M35 Axis Autech 7.5inch or larger ?
  • I need to know what tyre size will be acceptable when I go through compliance as I wont be around when it happens .
  • Has anyone tried the Toyo Teo plus for 235 40 18?
  • What new recommendations to Axis owners have for replacing the standard size 225 45 18 tyre or are you content with
    that size
  • What normal profile choice do I have if i don't proceed with a low profile tyre?

Thanks in advance

The 3% variance is for variation in tyre from O.E. I would guess.

The Axis rim is 18x8" +30 offset. It will easily take a 245 wide tyre without looking too "muffin top" :D .

As per my previous post; a 245/45/18 gives a slightly larger rolling diameter, and tested against a GPS, reduced speedo error from 110 km/h at a GPS verified 99 km/h, to 110 km/h at a GPS verified 107 km/h.

Khumo KU31 in the 245/45/18 has a load rating of 100.

Hope this helps, Dale

  • Could someone indicate which measurement must be within the 3% variance , in the quoted post?
  • Is the rim width on the M35 Axis Autech 7.5inch or larger ?
  • I need to know what tyre size will be acceptable when I go through compliance as I wont be around when it happens .
  • Has anyone tried the Toyo Teo plus for 235 40 18?
  • What new recommendations to Axis owners have for replacing the standard size 225 45 18 tyre or are you content with
    that size
  • What normal profile choice do I have if i don't proceed with a low profile tyre?

Thanks in advance

Hello,

It's the RSD Rolling Stock Diameter that needs to be within the 3% variance as it messes with the speedo.

Check here for all your requirements

http://www.1010tires.com/tiresizecalculator.asp

I swear by the Proxes 4, be sure what ever tyre you get has the appropriate load rating (eg 97w) as larger cars need a higher load rating, simply because they weigh more and is particularly important in heavy performance cars. I found many tyres had the right size but failed the load rating requirement.

I love the 245/40/18 97w profiles I have now and will not change. .

Remember the wider your tyre is, the side wall measurement changes in proportionate ratios. Which means a thinner tyre say 225/40 side wall will be a completely different size to a 245/40 side wall. It's all about relative ratio to tyre width.

Julius

Edited by Paramour
Hello,

It's the RSD Rolling Stock Diameter that needs to be within the 3% variance as it messes with the speedo.

Check here for all your requirements

http://www.1010tires.com/tiresizecalculator.asp

I swear by the Proxes 4, be sure what ever tyre you get has the appropriate load rating (eg 97w) as larger cars need a higher load rating, simply because they weigh more and is particularly important in heavy performance cars. I found many tyres had the right size but failed the load rating requirement.

I love the 245/40/18 97w profiles I have now and will not change. .

Remember the wider your tyre is, the side wall measurement changes in proportionate ratios. Which means a thinner tyre say 225/40 side wall will be a completely different size to a 245/40 side wall. It's all about relative ratio to tyre width.

Julius

Hello julius .

Thanks for the advice .

The japanese web site has 91 w for the stagea Axis autech http://www.autech.co.jp/HISTORY-SV/M35S01/eq.html if I decipher it correctly.

Where does your 97w come from as I cant locate any 225 45 18 tyres with a 97w rating

you in brissy mate

get your tyres from www.option1garage.com.au

very cheap

http://www.option1garage.com.au/NewTyres.htm

i think the ku31's were under $200 a corner

acutally, i found this, i asked for a quote a while ago

Kumho

235/40/18

KU31 $156.00

KU27 $192.00

KU37 $157.00

you in brissy mate

get your tyres from www.option1garage.com.au

very cheap

http://www.option1garage.com.au/NewTyres.htm

i think the ku31's were under $200 a corner

acutally, i found this, i asked for a quote a while ago

Kumho

235/40/18

KU31 $156.00

KU27 $192.00

KU37 $157.00

Yes in Brissy mate.

Comments I have received seem to rate the falken 452just over the federal over the KU31.

Is that a fair commment.

I have usually run Potenza but just not economical at the prices they are sellinfg at .So now I am trading off safety a little bit for mileage .I was very disappointed with michellan Pilot precedes as they wore out real quick

Edited by samuri

send option1 an email and tell them what your looking for

they will recommend you a tyre and unless you can order from a wholesaler they will be cheaper that bob jane or other tyre places

they sell more than what they advertise, could be worth just going to see them

the ku36's are supposed to be a good semi-slick (beter than the federal rs-r's) but probably not what your after

don't really know much about any of the other tyres but i'll find out once i have some money for new wheels too

let us know how you go, where you went and how much it was tho

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just wire a multimeter in, sit it up like it's a gauge, go for a drive, read temp gauge, read multimeter, speak to phone and tell it to take notes.
    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...