Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

holy short gearing!

Not really, that would be 1:1 (4th gear) on a 4.1-4.3 diff.

Youve been looking at GTR graphs too much zeeb lol.

And yes, thats a nice result. Good to see them making respectable power at decent boost levels.

  • 2 weeks later...

fair enough...but a random YouTube vid with a vague description doesn't prove anything...for all we know the car has a 100 shot of gas.

I don't mean to sound cynical but for every good Precision result there seems to be a bad one too.

I dont doubt they are a good turbo...but they are no better than Garrett/BW/MHI etc

they all have good and bad points, But I really hate people jumping up and down about how good X brand turbo is.

Well good news Zebra, I happened to be there that day for a HPI shoot and guess what, there was no gas. Well actually there could have been, but I didn't check under the dash for a sneaky Pete bottle...

It was pointed out earlier that they don't seem to make power on "reasonable" boost levels so I demonstrated a couple of cases that show the opposite. No jumping up and down here.

The precisions will want a lot of boost and you are risking your factory motor in the event of a minor fauxpas. For 400kw you will want to look at a 3788R, it is the replacement for 35Rish spool and more than T04Z power. You must run it in its twin scroll form.

ha,

my old man's 32 GTR is making 500hp @ the wheels on a measly 19psi with a stock bottem end and straight 98 from the bowser on a precision 6262. and this was done with the biggest heap of shit exhaust maniold which is a hks low mount cast log style. sick of seeing people whinge about how these turbos need like 40psi to make power and just by reading reviews from other people saying they are shit becuase they probley dont have the correct supporting mods to reap the full bennifit of the turbo.

^ A lot of people don't seem to understand that often when dyno results rely on lots of boost to make numbers its often the engine/boltons combination which isn't up to it, as opposed to the turbo itself... though the element of truth to the likes of PT6262s "needing lots of boost" is that they do come into their own at really high boost levels, naturally using a decent fuel to help the engine stay happy at those boost levels.

Hypothetically speaking, if a GT35R could hit 450kw on E85 and a PT6262 hit 500kw on the same engine with E85 - both on 2+bar of boost, wouldn't mean that if you ran both turbos on pump gas using 20psi you'd make 10+% more power with the PT6262.... more likely you'd make about the same.

ha,

my old man's 32 GTR is making 500hp @ the wheels on a measly 19psi with a stock bottem end and straight 98 from the bowser on a precision 6262. and this was done with the biggest heap of shit exhaust maniold which is a hks low mount cast log style. sick of seeing people whinge about how these turbos need like 40psi to make power and just by reading reviews from other people saying they are shit becuase they probley dont have the correct supporting mods to reap the full bennifit of the turbo.

Mind = Blown

Yes lithium, correct. But at the end of the day wouldent you rather a turbo that has the "same performance" as a 35r on mild boost and pump fuel, but if you ever wanted to switch over to e85 and crank some in it that it's ready to make numbers, not having to change to a larger turbo setup.

Exhibit A- the guy who was disappointed about his 5557 result and all you guys saying it was a shit result and a bad turbo for pump fuel, and it ended up him having a collapsed muffer. Hahahahh made me laugh how you's are quick to point the finger.

Anyway your loss is my gain. We are all more then happy with the turbos.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...