Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A mate of mine has been building his RB25 for AGES, has a PT6765 CEA for it and was aiming for around 800hp @ hubs - the 66s seem like a decent improvement too. I've prefered the HTAs up till now, still quite interested to see more PTxx66 results and see if they have made up some of the difference. Another mate has a GT3586HTA on his RB30 running >700hp @ hubs on relatively mild boost levels and E30, was held back by fuel system - was still gaining power.

Thats cool but the supra is 3 litres and this ones taken out even more.... We need to see some RB26 results to be able to fully understand if this turbos gonna be a lag monster or not ??

Try it, let us know, kthanxbi

ITP Race cars tuned a Skyline with a stock RB25 running a PT6262 BB turbo and made >350kw @ wheels on 98 octane, looked really good but the impression I got from the dyno plot was that it was making full boost in the area of 5000-5500rpm.... fairly inline with the impression I've always had of the PT6262s, quite laggy but quite potent.

How does the gt35 hta compare to gtx35??

Never seen a comparison, but I'd suggest that the HTA GT3582R would spool better and be more responsive than the GTX3582R but that GTX3582R would be capable of more power.

ITP Race cars tuned a Skyline with a stock RB25 running a PT6262 BB turbo and made >350kw @ wheels on 98 octane, looked really good but the impression I got from the dyno plot was that it was making full boost in the area of 5000-5500rpm.... fairly inline with the impression I've always had of the PT6262s, quite laggy but quite potent.

Never seen a comparison, but I'd suggest that the HTA GT3582R would spool better and be more responsive than the GTX3582R but that GTX3582R would be capable of more power.

Would GT3586Hta make more than GTX3582?

The GT3586HTAs have definitely made some insane power, and are my preference... though the GTX3582Rs aren't exactly shrinking violets.

Garrett used slightly misleading naming on their Garrett GTX range, the GTX3582R for example has a 83mm exducer - or 85mm if you factor in the extended tips. The old GT3582R had a 61mm inducer, while the GTX3582R inducer is 62.5mm (bigger than PT6262) which is getting up there considering a GT4088R is 63.5mm! Its a substantial sized compressor they are using, it'd be really interesting to drive a GT3582R and GTX3582R car back to back to see the difference.

  • 2 weeks later...

OK guys im trying to achieve 400hp with stock internals. Anyone reckon i could do that for about 6 months before she blows. and im also having a big debate over the GT-RS and the Precision turbo PT5558. Which one would be more suitable for a street car which low to mid range boost but lso with some reasonable power.

The GT3586HTAs have definitely made some insane power, and are my preference... though the GTX3582Rs aren't exactly shrinking violets.

Garrett used slightly misleading naming on their Garrett GTX range, the GTX3582R for example has a 83mm exducer - or 85mm if you factor in the extended tips. The old GT3582R had a 61mm inducer, while the GTX3582R inducer is 62.5mm (bigger than PT6262) which is getting up there considering a GT4088R is 63.5mm! Its a substantial sized compressor they are using, it'd be really interesting to drive a GT3582R and GTX3582R car back to back to see the difference.

a guy on sau has done gt35 to gtx35 on his car, gained some top end power, but lost midrange and response.

OK guys im trying to achieve 400hp with stock internals. Anyone reckon i could do that for about 6 months before she blows. and im also having a big debate over the GT-RS and the Precision turbo PT5558. Which one would be more suitable for a street car which low to mid range boost but lso with some reasonable power.

anyway im after a precison billet turbo that would have a low to midrange power band. and also has the capability to produce 300kw, so im thinking along street/race turbo of some sort. any help

I will assume you have an RB powered car, in which case I will say both the GTRS and 5558 are poor options for 300kw.

Firstly the GTRS is not capable of getting you there, that is a 250kw job and thats it. The Precision is a high boost application and will need E85 to make it a comfortable result.

There are better/easier methods of hitting the 300 mark on an RB (assume RB25 from here), I would recommend you look at a GT30 based turbo or a hypergear G3 unit. The GT30 has great resale and is a well proven item, it will need a custom dump/lines/intake. The hypergear G3 will need the custom intake pipe but will work with most of the stock lines and will bolt up to the OEM dump. The G3 is probably a little more likely to hit 300kw on 98 but the GT30 will be a little more responsive (both run a .82 IW housing).

If you want to move to an externally gated option you can pick up one of the 'steampipe' manifolds for a good price and look at a kando T67 for you 300kw mark. That will be more likely to net 330kw, and the mentioned kit totals roughly the same as a hypergear and much less than the said GT30.

Now back to precision turbos.

  • 3 weeks later...

The new Precision PT6465CEA is now out and Sound Performance have tested it out against a PT6266 and PT6766 on a couple of different engines. First is a bog stock 2JZ running E85 on 36psi:

62vs64vs67_ReidsCar.jpg

Then just for prosperities sake they ran the same turbos to their limit on a fully built 3.4litre:

62vs64vs67.jpg

Interesting to note that the 64mm made more power everywhere on the stock motor running "less than maxed out", the 67mm only came into its own when everything was pushed to their limits - which really shouldn't be too surprising.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...