Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anyone know of any GTR's running the PT6262 ball bearing with a T4 Divided .84 A/R with 3 5/8" V-Band discharge? would the .84 twin scroll be abit restrictive on the 26?

I have just bolted mine up today. The exact turbo u are talking about. Hoping to have it running by next weekend after i finish a 34 with PT5558.

I have fabbed up dump pipes for both and worked out cooler piping, plumb back pipes etc

efeef931.jpg

421f596b.jpg

This will be interesting Jez!

What's the specs for that 34?

Stock neo motor with Type B poncams and adj exh cam gear, link ecu with flex fuel tune, hybrid manifold, mvr 44mm gate, id2000's plazmaman ffp, DVS dump and plumbback pipe. Hoping to have it running and tuned early next week. Depending if Link arrives and also waiting on plazmaman plenum to be finished.

I was wondering whether you got the new turbo in yet, guess I have the answer.

How much boost are you going to run do you think?

That i will have to see what the engine likes when im tuning it. I will see how confident i feel with the power output as its a stock motor. Also running stock cams atm. I would like to see the differences in stock cams then type B poncams. Then i will think about doing variable cam once i have to upgrade the headgasket.

Very nice, shame its a stock motor as its probably not going to be able to show its real strength. I am assuming its a ball bearing 6262, and you are going to tune for E85?

Yes both are ball bearing. My rb26 i am trying to get as much response as possible which is why i went twinscroll 6boost manifold and .8 twin scroll rear. My old steelwheeled highflows came on hard around 4500rpm ad made 307 so i am aiming to better that

Yes both will be tuned on E85. They are actually both going to be be flex fuel tuned.

We understand the stock motors will be the limiting factor but not going to build the motorS until the time comes

My old steelwheeled highflows came on hard around 4500rpm ad made 307 so i am aiming to better that

Yes both will be tuned on E85. They are actually both going to be be flex fuel tuned.

Nice, very interested to see where it comes in - I've always had it in my head the PT6262 would be on the laggy side, though never been sure. If it can be all in before 4500rpm then that'd be fantastic :)

Stock neo motor with Type B poncams and adj exh cam gear, link ecu with flex fuel tune, hybrid manifold, mvr 44mm gate, id2000's plazmaman ffp, DVS dump and plumbback pipe. Hoping to have it running and tuned early next week. Depending if Link arrives and also waiting on plazmaman plenum to be finished.

That i will have to see what the engine likes when im tuning it. I will see how confident i feel with the power output as its a stock motor. Also running stock cams atm. I would like to see the differences in stock cams then type B poncams. Then i will think about doing variable cam once i have to upgrade the headgasket.

Are you going to stick with 2.5" out of the IC into the plenum or go 3"?

3 inch is pretty big Roy, I usually use 3 inch out of the turbo on builds over 400kw, I know it supports at least 550wkw from a car I did recently... 2.5 inch should be fine mate for either side.

I also fabricated piping for a built STI Liberty in 2 1/4 alloy, it runs 280awkw. More important is the cooler end tank design imo.

Just curious, mine are 2.5" and the numbers suggest that for 590cfm it should be fine with 2.5", but as always its interesting that the RB26 and GTR run 3" std

I see what u mean Roy, we will find out soon but i dont think the 2.5 will limit the setup. I think the only thing that will limit the setup is the standard internals

Very nice, shame its a stock motor as its probably not going to be able to show its real strength. I am assuming its a ball bearing 6262, and you are going to tune for E85?

the engine will take allot of abuse with that turbo on e85.... :P just dont be scared. These turbos come alive at around 28-35psi.

the engine will take allot of abuse with that turbo on e85.... :P just dont be scared. These turbos come alive at around 28-35psi.

Stre180 sr20vet made 'apparently' 760rwhp on a 6262 .63 housing it would want to be a low mileage 26 to even make 600whp reliable.

Stre180 sr20vet made 'apparently' 760rwhp on a 6262 .63 housing it would want to be a low mileage 26 to even make 600whp reliable.

I agree it would want to be a "known" engine but really 600whp is a walk in the park especially for a few dyno runs....if it was my own personal car like it is with jez i would have no problem running it regulary at 400rwkw. We see this power quite often on std 26 engines on E85. I reckon in realistic power @ 35 odd psi 700whp is achievable with that setup but i would stay sub 30 on std bottom end.... i still find it difficult to believe that 760whp result with the 0.63 housing.

Interesting that you mention that, someone I know hit 400awkw on E85 at around 22psi with his unopened <100,000km old RB26 and coolant started escaping places it wouldn't, I had thought it should be reasonably safely doable too... good to know there are plenty of others which have done so fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
    • The filter only filters down to a specific size. Add to that, the filter is AFTER the pump. So it means everything starts breaking your pump even if its being filtered out.
    • Just like in being 14mm too small (296mm) makes it not fit, being 14mm too big (324mm) it also won't fit. You want to find the correct rotor.
    • @GTSBoy Ok so that was the shops problem...they showed R33 rotors on R34 page and i did not know 296 do not fit(and are for R33) Yes i bought "kit" with rotors and pads. Pads are ok(i have GTT calipers front and rear). They have some 324mm but no 310mm. So i dont know if they would fit. I have 17inch LMGT4s So another question. Can i fit those in the rear or they are just "too" big for that?
×
×
  • Create New...