Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We have a GTR over here that runs on full 100% ethanol. Makes 630rwhp on a roller, gets the pure ethanol very cheap through a limited source.

Almost wouldn't start after sitting at the track on a cold night so not really a great recommendation haha

E100 isn't new, been there done that :)

An R34 with those K's though, never seen one in real life with that many k's on it!

You still haven't, it was a picture :ph34r: hehe

Its a good sign for the other 34's on the road though, shows they are well built!

Kurtis, the suspense is killing me already!

Oh come come now. You Daniels 34, tuned by Status - makes over 400 on E85 with just a Nismo :)

Exactly my point. 044 around 200lph. Nismo 246lph but i cant find specs for flow at higher psi which is where it counts

Well for a while I've suspected the Nismo pump to not be "as much" of an upgrade over a stock GT-R pump as many would believe.

It's simply the cheaper option so hence everyone goes down that road given a stocker is 10yrs old and offensively priced from Nissan

There are some numbers on a stock GT-R pump below (makes for some interesting reading).

http://www.stealth316.com/2-fuelpumpguide.htm

working in the boot of his car paid off today, AFR's are doing exactly what i wanted tonight. Just got back from a drive with it. went down to the servo to top up the $21 worth of EFLEX, racked up some sensible km's, think we are up to 50km just cruising around with a few squirts on 14psi low boost, and only 1 half throttle tyre fryer on high boost, got scared as midnight and tired, had a big day.

Maxed out at 367kw on 22psi, tried more boost with no gain, but very impressed as its all legal in the way of Catalytic converter and wastegate plumbed in, thing is a sleeper.

still got to finish the tune back from E67 down to 98 octane but atleast everything held together :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...