Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking at a Precision turbo for my rb25det Neo.

From what I've gathered the 6266 0.84 should match nicely. Motor is internally stock but will be running E85.

I'm thinking about spending the extra cash on a twin scroll setup, going to be in a light S15 so I'd want power delivery as smooth as possible.

Any graphs or comments for a similar setup

Edited by n_D

Hey dave do you have any specs on whats done to the head? Im guessing its got some $$$'s spent on it? As good as the 6466 is dave I would still keep the good old HKS T51R. :) TILL THIS DAY, They still sound the best out of every turbo out there when spooling and cracking that big gate open. Not to mention how farking PORRRRN they look in a skyline engine bay. Haha. How much more do you reckon the t51r has left in it on your setup dave?

At this stage piggaz has talked me into going a pt6262 on my built rb25 with a r33 gtr 2.6ltr crank in it. After seeing all these 6466 30/25 or 30/26 setups making such grouse power makes me just want to build a 30 bottem end and go 6466.

:) :) :)

Josh

Hey dave do you have any specs on whats done to the head? Im guessing its got some $$$'s spent on it? As good as the 6466 is dave I would still keep the good old HKS T51R. :) TILL THIS DAY, They still sound the best out of every turbo out there when spooling and cracking that big gate open. Not to mention how farking PORRRRN they look in a skyline engine bay. Haha. How much more do you reckon the t51r has left in it on your setup dave?

At this stage piggaz has talked me into going a pt6262 on my built rb25 with a r33 gtr 2.6ltr crank in it. After seeing all these 6466 30/25 or 30/26 setups making such grouse power makes me just want to build a 30 bottem end and go 6466.

:) :) :)

Josh

Why would you wanna change it when it sounds like this :D

Took a snap of the graph from the 6466 on the RB26 that JEM tuned the other month.

Soooo much midrange for the power output.

attachicon.gif1380269364291.jpg

+1 on getting specs of this motor. 950 ftlbs and 30psi at 4700rpm from a 64mm turbo on 2.6L? how is that even possible?

I'm pretty sure it's just a basic build.

Forged pistons and rods, drop in cams etc.

TS 6466.

We went out on a cruise sat night with a few other big HP GTRs and this thing annihilated everything, every bit as responsive as the graph suggests.

I'm pretty sure it's just a basic build.

Forged pistons and rods, drop in cams etc.

TS 6466.

We went out on a cruise sat night with a few other big HP GTRs and this thing annihilated everything, every bit as responsive as the graph suggests.

Loving the sound of this

Richard had to drop the motor as it was sitting too high and the plazmaman was hitting the bonnet, I was there on Thursday dropping off some E85 and Richard said that it was due back from the exhuaust shop later that day then they had to drop the engine and finish off some of the connectors and a few hoses here and there and then it will be ready to start and hopfully tune. He said should be ready by mid this week

Richard had to drop the motor as it was sitting too high and the plazmaman was hitting the bonnet, I was there on Thursday dropping off some E85 and Richard said that it was due back from the exhuaust shop later that day then they had to drop the engine and finish off some of the connectors and a few hoses here and there and then it will be ready to start and hopfully tune. He said should be ready by mid this week

God. I can hear the money burning by the hour.

I hope it turns out well for you mate :thumbsup:

Not the same on the street?

How much more than the 6262?

With the hubber they are usually about 300-500rpm better on the street. With the roller it's usually closer but even if it was the same as the dyno it would still be awesome

I'm pretty sure it's just a basic build. Forged pistons and rods, drop in cams etc. TS 6466.We went out on a cruise sat night with a few other big HP GTRs and this thing annihilated everything, every bit as responsive as the graph suggests.

We'll, forgive me for being a sceptic, but I need to see a timeslip or data log to believe. This thing still makes 200 ftlbs more than I thought possible and spools earlier than a 35r. Crazy!

When I had a GT35R it was on song (26psi) by 4400rpm. This thing is laggier than that, id say T04Z territory.

These aren't a big turbo physically which is surprising to see what they produce. Looks like a GT35R from the front but the rear housing looks quite large.

The blade design on the turbine side is also something I haven't seen before, it is like the blades are convex. (if that makes sense)?

Just to add, I have seen 2x SR20VEs with these turbos making more power and on earlier than my T51R KAI RB30/25.

One ran 154mph and the other 148mph, both 5 speed H pattern cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...