Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We'll, forgive me for being a sceptic, but I need to see a timeslip or data log to believe. This thing still makes 200 ftlbs more than I thought possible and spools earlier than a 35r. Crazy!

Did you see the boost level it is running? Most RB26s aren't running nearly that, and it is twin scroll which is capable of boosting torque "per psi" versus a single entry... all works well towards making a lot of torque.

In terms of spool, to be honest it did surprise me too - but it is definitely worse than GT3582Rs, particularly than twin scroll ones (keeping it apples vs apples).

More things to consider - if we were to give all these turbos names to match Precision's ones (using wheel sizes) it may put into perspective how big a PT6466 is (or isn't) considering what it can make:

GT3582R - GT6162R

GTX3582R - GT6362R

PT6466 - PT6466

T04Z - GT6765

The 66CEA turbine has by reputation less lag and more flow than the old 65mm T-series Garrett design as well, and the compressor is a light billet wheel - so really for the size they should spool at least as well as a cast wheel equivalent... ignoring aerodynamics :)

Fitting somewhere between a GT3582R and a T04Z really shouldn't be too surprising, which is why it's magic that it's a 600kw @ wheels capable turbo :D

Also worth noting that the 6466 a few pages back looks similar on Chequered Tuning's dyno:

GTRdyno_zps1b56479c.jpg

Be interesting to overlay that and the new Hypergear "ultimate" 500kw turbo

Nice work! That is an awesome power delivery, and more in it is always a bonus :-D

SCR48 is in Perth, silly me. Be interesting to compare the results, what are the odds two 2530/6466 setups would be tuned on the same day?

That was my car.

Couldn't go past 27 due to needing to up the breathers on the rocker covers and mainly from frying tyres on the dyno

attachicon.gifImageUploadedBySAU Community1380774170.916023.jpg

nice result man. what rpm was it letting loose on the dyno? given that likey abit more than what thats reading

pretty linear from the 4700rpm mark! almost flat lines

Edited by Frosty

Nice work! That is an awesome power delivery, and more in it is always a bonus :-D

SCR48 is in Perth, silly me. Be interesting to compare the results, what are the odds two 2530/6466 setups would be tuned on the same day?

nah he is QLD hick like the rest of them :P

My main thing was that i wanted it be strictly streetable and wasnt fussed about the dyno figure - not that its too bad at all! Therefore I went for a 6466 with .84 twin scroll - I was concerned this would be too big as I was thinking to go for a 6266 originally - although very happy with this setup which is super responsive compared to most cars I have been in, not to mention torquey-as down low due to the RB30.

It has been running for some time on 13psi run in tune which it did 308rwkw on pump 98 - then 20psi on e85 which it did 365rwkw for about 2 weeks.

Even on 20 psi the car is a wild drive on the streets - stepping out in 4th gear once is hits about 4000rpm as if it was second gear (still waiting on half decent tyres to show up).

If I upgrade the catch can (which is small as I wanted it to be hidden) they could push 34psi but doubt I will ever need to, nor bother going to the troubble as this thing has been in the making for over a year now!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...