Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Buraz said:

What's everyone's results with 6262 precision??

My is out of puff at just under 440kw and 26 psi on a 2.8l stroker

Mine has gone 560kw at the hubs. 440kw sounds significantly lower regardless of the dyno. Got a graph? Any restrictions?

Ahhh okay!! That's a big difference for sure. No restrictions whatsoever, it's a split pulse 6 boost and twin gates too. 17.5psi springs!!

 

Car hammers no doubt about it and I'm more than happy. Just thought I'd share my results with you guys and see other results

Oh wow that's a massive difference!! Is it same rear housing as mine?? After talking to a few people now, this thing is only a tiny turbo and tell me it's about right.
But yours is an unbelievable result. Still a 2.6?

  • 5 weeks later...

Mine should be hitting the dyno next week hopefully 

previous tune was 645kw at 34psi with a 7175 gt42 on a hks 2.8

few changes since last tune such as 100mm plazmaman cooler and turbo1 custom twin scroll manifold with twin 38mm tial gates,

should come on nicer now then it did with the old greddy stainless manifold

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
On ‎25‎/‎05‎/‎2017 at 10:04 PM, SiR_RB said:

Mine should be hitting the dyno next week hopefully 

previous tune was 645kw at 34psi with a 7175 gt42 on a hks 2.8

few changes since last tune such as 100mm plazmaman cooler and turbo1 custom twin scroll manifold with twin 38mm tial gates,

should come on nicer now then it did with the old greddy stainless manifold

How did it go?

I am quite interested to see how much difference a manifold makes.

I have a 6766 on a T88 Greddy manifold and have access to a 6 boost if the need arises. The car makes 460 odd rwkw @30psi on Unigroups dyno and traps 138mph but I still want more.

Have been told I should have gone the 6466 as its better suited to an RB26

Edited by ido09s
On 26/06/2017 at 11:22 PM, SimonR32 said:

The 6262 sillyness is never ending... New cams just got the most power and torque it's ever made

20170626_145138_zpswxu7yhfh.jpg

Lol what..

760 awhp on a turbo rated to 705hp.. not questioning your results but that is going to be overspeeding by like 30%

 

Very impressive that it's still happy pushed that hard. I'm interested in your exhaust back pressure and compressor outlet temp numbers.

Dynapack hubber gives a possible 5-10% inflated reading.. However simons back to back results with his setup and different cam combos are awesome and the car speaks for itself performance wise.. 

Its unfortunate that the next time its dynoed it wont be a true back to back unless you can sweet talk sean and he has access to the dyno still

 

Edited by azzada1
6 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Lol what..

760 awhp on a turbo rated to 705hp.. not questioning your results but that is going to be overspeeding by like 30%

 

Very impressive that it's still happy pushed that hard. I'm interested in your exhaust back pressure and compressor outlet temp numbers.

Technically it's rear hub hp, not awhp. I don't think they have an overspeed (it's not an EFR after all)

Turning the dyno on SAE correction it shows up 797hp so god knows how much it's making at the flywheel but definitely more than the turbo is rated at. Never measured backpressure in exhaust but air temps after the intercooler are more than reasonable

30 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Technically it's rear hub hp, not awhp. I don't think they have an overspeed (it's not an EFR after all)

Turning the dyno on SAE correction it shows up 797hp so god knows how much it's making at the flywheel but definitely more than the turbo is rated at. Never measured backpressure in exhaust but air temps after the intercooler are more than reasonable

its frustrating that no compressor maps are available for precisions because a turbo compressor power rating is usually based on an efficiency below 58% or even the stonewall flow (flow choke) of the compressor. this is the speed that part of the assembly reaches sonic speed and flow basically cannot be increased any further by spinning it faster or altering the downstream pressure. thats why the choke line is vertical in a compressor map. (although note that maps from garret state efficiency below 58% is the end of their displayed map, and they consider that point "overspeeding") It's not necessarily when it wants to fall apart, but the efficiency falls over and then finally the compressor won't flow any more due to sonic shock waves inside the compressor inlet or volute causing a choked flow condition.

its interesting that the Precisions seem to be happy well past the flow the manufacturer rates the compressor for. whereas Borg Warner made their turbines strong enough to cope with the choke speed of the compressor they paired it with and not much more as its outside the design parameters.

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...