Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Griffin said:

Is that comparable to efr7670  /gt3576 ?

Impeller sizing on the PTE 5862 is very similar to the EFR 7670.

GTX 3576 runs a smaller turbine.

You'd think "broadly" comparable units, but they will all perform a little differently whether in-gear response, max flow, or boost recovery on gear changes.  Housing options in all cases would make a huge difference on those performance measures.

I'll be watching for results/impressions on the 5862.  V band turbine inlet, very nice :)

10 minutes ago, SiR_RB said:

Precision just released a new turbo model at sema,

7275 gen2, hopefuly start seeing some results shortly

At the 1000+hp mark, going to need something to stop it sucking the seagulls in!!

What application do you reckon Michael? - Strap one to a GTR and go Flying 500 at WTAC 2018, Snowy 1000 etc?

 

 

  • 3 months later...
4 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

6262 still going strong. Makes very similar power on Mainline and Dynapack

20180228_170355.jpg

Bloody hell.  Mainline hub I'm assuming?

Either way, huge result - I know this might be a silly question and I don't mean to be a dick by asking it but I'm just interested in knowing your thoughts... are you 100% sure this isn't a 6266?  There are plenty of people making less than this with 6266s and even 6466s :O

2 hours ago, Lithium said:

Bloody hell.  Mainline hub I'm assuming?

Either way, huge result - I know this might be a silly question and I don't mean to be a dick by asking it but I'm just interested in knowing your thoughts... are you 100% sure this isn't a 6266?  There are plenty of people making less than this with 6266s and even 6466s

Yep, Mainline hub... First time using it, cool bit of kit and very consistent.

Funny you should ask (and I'm not insulted), I just mentioned to my mate who does a lot of work on the car yesterday how I wonder if somehow they managed to chuck a 6262 sticker on a bigger turbo. It's rated at 705hp but has done 766hp on a Dynapack with the correct correction and now 771hp on a Mainline hub. So god knows... In saying that I can't see it really being any bigger because it's making 15psi by under 4000rpm on the road in 1:1 ratio.

 

1 hour ago, azzada1 said:

Was that at the dyno day simon or private tune? I recall a softer ramp rate being talked about to help a certain au for the dyno day so just curious.. excellent result for the 62mm either way

Just did it yesterday, funnily enough a Falcon with 1100hp had just come off with a ramp rate that made my car sound like it was in 1st gear. We extended the ramp rate to a much more appropriate level 

  • Like 1
44 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Yep, Mainline hub... First time using it, cool bit of kit and very consistent.

Funny you should ask (and I'm not insulted), I just mentioned to my mate who does a lot of work on the car yesterday how I wonder if somehow they managed to chuck a 6262 sticker on a bigger turbo. It's rated at 705hp but has done 766hp on a Dynapack with the correct correction and now 771hp on a Mainline hub. So god knows... In saying that I can't see it really being any bigger because it's making 15psi by under 4000rpm on the road in 1:1 ratio.

 

Just did it yesterday, funnily enough a Falcon with 1100hp had just come off with a ramp rate that made my car sound like it was in 1st gear. We extended the ramp rate to a much more appropriate level 

Glad you got where I was coming from - was definitely not trying to be a hater or anything, just thinking through everything and I was fairly sure there was a decent chance the same thought process may have gone through your head too. 

I was pretty sure you'd mentioned the spool was pretty decent and that definitely seems good considering the kind of spool vs power that people used to put up with.  This is a .84a/r hotside eh?  What diff ratio do you have?

Here is a 4.3x drive ratio in 4th gear doing a similar pull with a 1.00a/r 6466 with purely wastegate spring boost control at 1bar (so 1bar happens later than it might with electronic boost targetting an appropriate boost level) and considering how much bigger it should be than a .84 6262 it doesn't necessarily look THAT much laggier.  

Could look at it that it's time for a 6466? ;)  You can see in the preview shot that it's already touching 10psi by 4000rpm and swinging up hard before the gate cracks

 

 

 

 

Edited by Lithium
46 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Glad you got where I was coming from - was definitely not trying to be a hater or anything, just thinking through everything and I was fairly sure there was a decent chance the same thought process may have gone through your head too. 

I was pretty sure you'd mentioned the spool was pretty decent and that definitely seems good considering the kind of spool vs power that people used to put up with.  This is a .84a/r hotside eh?  What diff ratio do you have?

Here is a 4.3x drive ratio in 4th gear doing a similar pull with a 1.00a/r 6466 with purely wastegate spring boost control at 1bar (so 1bar happens later than it might with electronic boost targetting an appropriate boost level) and considering how much bigger it should be than a .84 6262 it doesn't necessarily look THAT much laggier.  

Could look at it that it's time for a 6466? ;)  You can see in the preview shot that it's already touching 10psi by 4000rpm and swinging up hard before the gate cracks

 

 

 

 

0.84 and 4.11

Looking at logs I get 10psi in 1st at 4200 and 2nd at 3800

I've got a 15psi spring in my gate so I can potentially turn off my Mac valve and do a very similar run to that but on first looks it's a fair bit laggier. Assume it's a 2.6L?

 

Edited by SimonR32
7 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

I've got a 15psi spring in my gate so I can potentially do a very similar run to that but on first looks it's a fair bit laggier

That'd be interesting for academia's sake but I believe you - there definitely should be a fair difference between the 1.00 6466 and the .84 6262 :)  

It's a hard result to argue with, nice work!

2 minutes ago, Lithium said:

That'd be interesting for academia's sake but I believe you - there definitely should be a fair difference between the 1.00 6466 and the .84 6262 :)  

It's a hard result to argue with, nice work!

Will grab some logs tonight. Because of the PPG 6 speed mine will sit almost dead inbetween between 4th and 5th compared to 4th in 4.3 so I'll do both and post average.

Should be interesting on weekend at Racewars, have 1000m run and I'm guessing I'll pick up a lot of speed from the sequential box. Best guess is around the 295km/hr region 

5 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Yep, Mainline hub... First time using it, cool bit of kit and very consistent.

Funny you should ask (and I'm not insulted), I just mentioned to my mate who does a lot of work on the car yesterday how I wonder if somehow they managed to chuck a 6262 sticker on a bigger turbo. It's rated at 705hp but has done 766hp on a Dynapack with the correct correction and now 771hp on a Mainline hub. So god knows... In saying that I can't see it really being any bigger because it's making 15psi by under 4000rpm on the road in 1:1 ratio.

 

That dyno run puts a smile on your face, i watched it several times lol, what boost was that at?

Its funny how precision rate the power of the turbos, when i spoke with them they said compressor maps cost too much to produce so they use real world figures.

I went through the process with them and they spec the 5862 for my car which they rate at 700hp. Obviously uses the same size turbine as the 6262 but has a smaller 58-76mm compressor instead of 62-82mm.

Had been hoping to have mine together by now but its still a little way off, hopefully soon though

20180106_101538_resized.thumb.jpg.48bfe36122d1a610f507180c6fa7ee75.jpg

7 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Will grab some logs tonight. Because of the PPG 6 speed mine will sit almost dead inbetween between 4th and 5th compared to 4th in 4.3 so I'll do both and post average.

300rpm better in the shorter 4th and more like 500-600rpm better in the longer 5th. From experience that would make a big difference to driveability.

10 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Video of the run, about 8 sec by the looks

20180228_165754_1.mp4

Sounds yummy :) Great result!

Where are you getting it tuned these days? Need to find somewhere decent to go once I finish building my house and get my car back from storage.

3 hours ago, NEO25T said:

That was the turbo i picked until precision steered me to the 5862.

There was a 4 door r34 in the for sale section with the 6062 recently 407kw e85 25psi

Found it ? it even came off the same dyno as mine 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...